|
Post by M1104 on Jun 18, 2020 9:25:23 GMT
The P5's & C10's Caetano's have full 474 destinations programmed in (maybe others) Sorry is that for route 474 or four hundred and seventy four different destinations?
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Jun 18, 2020 10:52:17 GMT
The P5's & C10's Caetano's have full 474 destinations programmed in (maybe others) Sorry is that for route 474 or four hundred and seventy four different destinations? Route 474
|
|
|
Post by M1104 on Jun 18, 2020 11:05:43 GMT
Sorry is that for route 474 or four hundred and seventy four different destinations? Route 474 Thanks! Had it been the standard London spec blindsets I would have assumed it's the route but as it's digitalised I had to be sure.
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Dec 12, 2020 19:25:35 GMT
The 306's VWH's have 533 on the blinds even though double decker's are banned from the route. Could this be a sign of things to come? 🤔
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Dec 12, 2020 19:28:17 GMT
The 306's VWH's have 533 on the blinds even though double decker's are banned from the route. Could this be a sign of things to come? 🤔 and they have the 235 on the blinds as well.
|
|
|
Post by kmkcheng on Dec 13, 2020 2:02:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cl54 on Dec 13, 2020 5:38:19 GMT
Route 474 Thanks! Had it been the standard London spec blindsets I would have assumed it's the route but as it's digitalised I had to be sure. The displays on the Abellio vehicles are manufactured by Hanover who supplied the West Ham trial panels. The buses at Walworth have the West Ham routes in their "memory".
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Dec 13, 2020 9:39:48 GMT
Yep, that's the pic I saw, forgot what platform it was on when I went to make this post so didn't include it
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Jan 27, 2021 13:41:53 GMT
What is stopping the 265 from having double deckers? Even the VH's are blinded for it and I can't think of any obvious restriction
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2021 13:52:05 GMT
What is stopping the 265 from having double deckers? Even the VH's are blinded for it and I can't think of any obvious restriction The side roads on the A3 are quite narrow and I’ve experienced single deckers squeezing past parked cars particularly on the Beverley Way section. It could be these present problems for safety, also the turn around on Roehampton Lane after the double run towards Roehampton might also be tricky for a double decker.
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Jan 27, 2021 14:11:41 GMT
What is stopping the 265 from having double deckers? Even the VH's are blinded for it and I can't think of any obvious restriction The side roads on the A3 are quite narrow and I’ve experienced single deckers squeezing past parked cars particularly on the Beverley Way section. It could be these present problems for safety, also the turn around on Roehampton Lane after the double run towards Roehampton might also be tricky for a double decker. The 849 does that turn with E400's, though you might be right about the side roads
|
|
|
Post by redexpress on Jan 28, 2021 7:05:35 GMT
What is stopping the 265 from having double deckers? Even the VH's are blinded for it and I can't think of any obvious restriction The side roads on the A3 are quite narrow and I’ve experienced single deckers squeezing past parked cars particularly on the Beverley Way section. It could be these present problems for safety, also the turn around on Roehampton Lane after the double run towards Roehampton might also be tricky for a double decker. The 265 uses 10.9m buses, so tight turns are obviously not an issue (most London DDs, excluding LTs, are shorter than that). The narrow side roads could be a problem given that DDs are slightly wider than E200s, although the difference is marginal.
|
|