|
Post by britishguy54 on Mar 6, 2024 19:02:00 GMT
I hadn't stumbled across this until recently: www.quickmap.com/london-bus-map.htmThought it was quite an interesting way of presenting things, with pluses and minuses, but the SL routes are pretty clear. That looks really good.
|
|
|
Post by abellion on Mar 23, 2024 17:21:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by matthieu1221 on Mar 24, 2024 15:07:24 GMT
The Gants Hill map also seems badly cropped on the right side! Wonder if the printed versions are fine or similarly cut off.
|
|
|
Post by twobellstogo on Mar 24, 2024 17:30:07 GMT
Really, TfL need a root and branch review of their mapping. Ideally a return to geographic maps - if Surrey and Hertfordshire can do it, so can London, coupled with spider maps for every significant area of London (and if geographic maps are also used, the more recent style of spider map will suffice), and also in an ideal world, every route will retain the same colour, whatever spider map it is on : currently done for Superloop, but should be done for all routes.
|
|
|
Post by matthieu1221 on Mar 26, 2024 13:58:16 GMT
Really, TfL need a root and branch review of their mapping. Ideally a return to geographic maps - if Surrey and Hertfordshire can do it, so can London, coupled with spider maps for every significant area of London (and if geographic maps are also used, the more recent style of spider map will suffice), and also in an ideal world, every route will retain the same colour, whatever spider map it is on : currently done for Superloop, but should be done for all routes. The 'Key bus routes in central London' style would be very nice for a full network map.
|
|
|
Post by twobellstogo on Mar 27, 2024 10:59:14 GMT
Really, TfL need a root and branch review of their mapping. Ideally a return to geographic maps - if Surrey and Hertfordshire can do it, so can London, coupled with spider maps for every significant area of London (and if geographic maps are also used, the more recent style of spider map will suffice), and also in an ideal world, every route will retain the same colour, whatever spider map it is on : currently done for Superloop, but should be done for all routes. The 'Key bus routes in central London' style would be very nice for a full network map. Can you imagine the spaghetti-fied mess that would be? No thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Mar 27, 2024 13:49:56 GMT
Really, TfL need a root and branch review of their mapping. Ideally a return to geographic maps - if Surrey and Hertfordshire can do it, so can London, coupled with spider maps for every significant area of London (and if geographic maps are also used, the more recent style of spider map will suffice), and also in an ideal world, every route will retain the same colour, whatever spider map it is on : currently done for Superloop, but should be done for all routes. The 'Key bus routes in central London' style would be very nice for a full network map. I don't think that this would be a good idea, however I do think someone needs to update the Central London map and remove routes that shouldn't be on there anymore and probably add routes that should be on there now like the 26.
|
|
|
Post by matthieu1221 on Mar 28, 2024 17:14:43 GMT
The 'Key bus routes in central London' style would be very nice for a full network map. I don't think that this would be a good idea, however I do think someone needs to update the Central London map and remove routes that shouldn't be on there anymore and probably add routes that should be on there now like the 26. Every revision since April 2023 has been quite lazy to be frank. The east west 11 link not replaced by the 26, the 59 link north south to Euston from Kingsway not being replaced by the 168 or now the 1.
|
|