|
Post by 15002 on Aug 16, 2019 10:52:02 GMT
Yes I do know its most probably a loan I wish it was allocated DEs they are much better than the DEMs It's nice its getting new MMCs. Most likely will be one of the last orders along with the 192 and 364 to receive diesel MMCs. It is nice that MMCs are ordered, although I wish it was an Allison gearbox rather than the standard Voith gearbox personally.
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Aug 16, 2019 12:06:54 GMT
VH45124 TV>HH
|
|
|
Post by E279 on Aug 16, 2019 12:08:16 GMT
Returned home.
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Aug 16, 2019 12:08:59 GMT
Returned home. Yep, shame thet the 85 is fully back to Gem 3 VH's though
|
|
|
Post by george on Aug 16, 2019 12:09:28 GMT
I was going to get this the other day but E160 turned up on the 430
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Aug 16, 2019 12:17:42 GMT
I was going to get this the other day but E160 turned up on the 430 Same, I just missed it when going to Asda
|
|
|
Post by VWH1414 on Aug 16, 2019 12:33:41 GMT
There's going to be loads of DE's surplus tomorrow with Metroline losing 3 routes to Go-Ahead. I actually am quite happy rather than not happy they lost them as it will allow Metroline to oust some of their 08/58 reg E200. They would've probably been replaced if retained anyway - The 232 definitely needed new buses, as all E200s at W are pretty much becoming too old for another contract (except some later 11 regs). The 214 would've needed new buses for the ULEZ so would probably have got E200MMC Electrics anyway (like the 46) and the 209s fleet was also too old so again would've probably got new DELs (Then would have a common fleet with the 235). Even with this I can see more ex First buses going off lease rather then the 08/58 reg leaving.
|
|
|
Post by Max B on Aug 16, 2019 14:35:01 GMT
EH165 Q > NX.
|
|
|
Post by E279 on Aug 17, 2019 5:06:07 GMT
36267 NS > TB
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Aug 18, 2019 19:29:59 GMT
And going the other way: 10141 TB > NS Would be interesting if 36267 runs into ENL109 whilst at TB since that's its sister , shame Arriva can't put any SD's on the 466
|
|
|
Post by E279 on Aug 18, 2019 19:33:43 GMT
And going the other way: 10141 TB > NS Clever North Street, by doing this that vehicle is intended for the 128 in October but by doing this and the 499s move on 24th NS can use vehicles needed for the 128 on the 296 and source the vehicles needed for the 296 at a later time. Did you see this at NS as its not on LVF yet.
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Aug 18, 2019 19:56:56 GMT
And going the other way: 10141 TB > NS Clever North Street, by doing this that vehicle is intended for the 128 in October but by doing this and the 499s move on 24th NS can use vehicles needed for the 128 on the 296 and source the vehicles needed for the 296 at a later time. Did you see this at NS as its not on LVF yet. Various photos elsewhere show it parked outside NS, still with its TB set in it
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Aug 18, 2019 20:32:16 GMT
Clever North Street, by doing this that vehicle is intended for the 128 in October but by doing this and the 499s move on 24th NS can use vehicles needed for the 128 on the 296 and source the vehicles needed for the 296 at a later time. Did you see this at NS as its not on LVF yet. Various photos elsewhere show it parked outside NS, still with its TB set in it I did chuckle when I saw that parked up
|
|
|
Post by E279 on Aug 18, 2019 20:35:07 GMT
Various photos elsewhere show it parked outside NS, still with its TB set in it I did chuckle when I saw that parked up Where was the photo posted? NS are quick to change blinds and garage codes so my guess is it’ll be service tomorrow at some point.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Aug 18, 2019 20:36:38 GMT
I did chuckle when I saw that parked up Where was the photo posted? NS are quick to change blinds and garage codes so my guess is it’ll be service tomorrow at some point. On one of the Facebook groups.
|
|