Post by snoggle on May 27, 2015 14:16:48 GMT
After the gap for the election we are now back to normal for the Mayor's Question Time. There were a fair number of transport Q&As and they're set out below. There are a number of transport questions without responses yet nor are there minutes of the oral Q&A session in the meeting. I've not included these.
This is a very long post so be warned!!
Noteworthy items are on NB4L braking systems, Beckton DLR timetable changes, changes for the Royal Docks bus network on the way, route 53 curtailment etc.
And yes I know the N15 frequency is wrong as is "Clayberry" but I'm copying what TfL wrote!
And yes that is the highest paid councillor in the Country saying it is OK to throw away any budgetary concerns in order to run a bus service to a hospital. Talk about rampant hypocrisy.
Oh look another demand for budgets to be ignored just so an AM's constituents can go to hospital? Can we throw all budgets out of the window for bus service changes?
This is a very long post so be warned!!
Noteworthy items are on NB4L braking systems, Beckton DLR timetable changes, changes for the Royal Docks bus network on the way, route 53 curtailment etc.
Tramlink - cycles
Question No:2015/1199
Caroline Pidgeon
What consideration has been given to allowing cycles to be carried on Tramlink services during off-peak hours?
The Mayor
Only folded cycles are permitted to be carried on London Tramlink services. Space on board trams is already at a considerable premium, with a shared user space already being well utilised by both wheelchairs and children's buggies. This is true throughout the day on trams, in contrast to some other parts of the rail network that currently carry cycles at off peak times. In addition, as trams operate on shared road space, they can decelerate and brake much more sharply than trains and, therefore, there is a greater risk of an unsecured bike causing injuries to passengers.
Question No:2015/1199
Caroline Pidgeon
What consideration has been given to allowing cycles to be carried on Tramlink services during off-peak hours?
The Mayor
Only folded cycles are permitted to be carried on London Tramlink services. Space on board trams is already at a considerable premium, with a shared user space already being well utilised by both wheelchairs and children's buggies. This is true throughout the day on trams, in contrast to some other parts of the rail network that currently carry cycles at off peak times. In addition, as trams operate on shared road space, they can decelerate and brake much more sharply than trains and, therefore, there is a greater risk of an unsecured bike causing injuries to passengers.
Finsbury Park station - Wells Terrace entrance(1)
Question No:2015/1240
Caroline Pidgeon
On 16th April, passengers using Finsbury Park station were informed that the Wells Terrace entrance would close from Monday 20th, yet the following day were told the work was delayed and the entrance would remain open. Why were passengers informed of this change at such short notice?
The Mayor
Finsbury Park Tube station improvements are being co-ordinated with a Network Rail station step-free access scheme and a privated evelopment adjacent to the station. Shortly before the planned closure of Wells Terrace, the developer informed TfL that they were not in a position to proceed with their work from 20 April. Once TfL had confirmation that the developer was not in a position to start works as scheduled, TfL communicated this immediately to customers.
Finsbury Park station - Wells Terrace entrance(2)
Question No:2015/1241
Caroline Pidgeon
What is the updated timescale for the works at Finsbury Park station?
The Mayor
TfL remains firmly committed to delivering improvements, including step-free access, at Finsbury Park Underground station.
TfL is currently working closely with the developer, with whom the station works are being coordinated, and with Network Rail to clarify when these improvements can be delivered. The developer will make the timescales for these works available as soon as possible.
Question No:2015/1240
Caroline Pidgeon
On 16th April, passengers using Finsbury Park station were informed that the Wells Terrace entrance would close from Monday 20th, yet the following day were told the work was delayed and the entrance would remain open. Why were passengers informed of this change at such short notice?
The Mayor
Finsbury Park Tube station improvements are being co-ordinated with a Network Rail station step-free access scheme and a privated evelopment adjacent to the station. Shortly before the planned closure of Wells Terrace, the developer informed TfL that they were not in a position to proceed with their work from 20 April. Once TfL had confirmation that the developer was not in a position to start works as scheduled, TfL communicated this immediately to customers.
Finsbury Park station - Wells Terrace entrance(2)
Question No:2015/1241
Caroline Pidgeon
What is the updated timescale for the works at Finsbury Park station?
The Mayor
TfL remains firmly committed to delivering improvements, including step-free access, at Finsbury Park Underground station.
TfL is currently working closely with the developer, with whom the station works are being coordinated, and with Network Rail to clarify when these improvements can be delivered. The developer will make the timescales for these works available as soon as possible.
Bus route 53 - temporary curtailment
Question No:2015/1243
Caroline Pidgeon
You will be aware that bus route 53 (Plumstead to Whitehall) has been terminating early at Lambeth North since January due to road works near Westminster Bridge. Passengers were told that this was a temporary arrangement until March. The service is still terminated early. Can you inform passengers when you plan to restore this service as promised?
The Mayor
The curtailment of the daytime service on route 53 at County Hall, just south of Westminster Bridge, was originally introduced to mitigate for work taking place in Bridge Street, Westminster. Although this work has now been completed, modification of the junction at Elephant and Castle is impacting upon the reliability of route 53 and other bus services that run through this area.
As a result the curtailment of route 53 will continue for the foreseeable future until the works allow the service to be restored to Whitehall. This will ensure a more reliable service for the majority of passengers using route 53. Transfer tickets are available to help customers continue their journey by using any other bus route and will expire one hour after they are issued. TfL is keen to return to normal operation as soon as possible. TfL will continue to review the curtailment on a monthly basis. The route will be brought into full operation once TfL is satisfied there is sufficient resilience in the route's operation to be extended back to Whitehall.
Question No:2015/1243
Caroline Pidgeon
You will be aware that bus route 53 (Plumstead to Whitehall) has been terminating early at Lambeth North since January due to road works near Westminster Bridge. Passengers were told that this was a temporary arrangement until March. The service is still terminated early. Can you inform passengers when you plan to restore this service as promised?
The Mayor
The curtailment of the daytime service on route 53 at County Hall, just south of Westminster Bridge, was originally introduced to mitigate for work taking place in Bridge Street, Westminster. Although this work has now been completed, modification of the junction at Elephant and Castle is impacting upon the reliability of route 53 and other bus services that run through this area.
As a result the curtailment of route 53 will continue for the foreseeable future until the works allow the service to be restored to Whitehall. This will ensure a more reliable service for the majority of passengers using route 53. Transfer tickets are available to help customers continue their journey by using any other bus route and will expire one hour after they are issued. TfL is keen to return to normal operation as soon as possible. TfL will continue to review the curtailment on a monthly basis. The route will be brought into full operation once TfL is satisfied there is sufficient resilience in the route's operation to be extended back to Whitehall.
Bus route 331 - access to Mount Vernon Hospital
Question No:2015/1246
Caroline Pidgeon
A constituent informs me that the 331 bus route travels past three closer boarding and alighting points before stopping for 'Mont Vernon Hospital' (Northwood). Given many passengers using this stop have mobility issues, will you investigate whether the service can stop closer to the hospital entrance?
The Mayor
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. TfL is currently investigating this issue and will respond to you in due course.
Question No:2015/1246
Caroline Pidgeon
A constituent informs me that the 331 bus route travels past three closer boarding and alighting points before stopping for 'Mont Vernon Hospital' (Northwood). Given many passengers using this stop have mobility issues, will you investigate whether the service can stop closer to the hospital entrance?
The Mayor
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. TfL is currently investigating this issue and will respond to you in due course.
Bethnal Green Stations
Question No:2015/1287
John Biggs
On assuming overground status for a number of Greater Anglia Services out of Liverpool Street, TfL will be responsible for all services through Bethnal Green Overground Station. Will you consider renaming this to avoid the naming clash with the other Bethnal Green (Underground) station which is about ¼ mile away?
The Mayor
The infrastructure for this station is owned by Network Rail and renaming the station would require consultation with both Network Rail and the DfT. Changing the name would have a number of substantial operational and cost implications. These costs are unlikely to be justified for the possible benefits, given there have been two Bethnal Green stations in operation for many years. TfL will keep this matter under consideration and review passenger feedback on this issue.
Question No:2015/1287
John Biggs
On assuming overground status for a number of Greater Anglia Services out of Liverpool Street, TfL will be responsible for all services through Bethnal Green Overground Station. Will you consider renaming this to avoid the naming clash with the other Bethnal Green (Underground) station which is about ¼ mile away?
The Mayor
The infrastructure for this station is owned by Network Rail and renaming the station would require consultation with both Network Rail and the DfT. Changing the name would have a number of substantial operational and cost implications. These costs are unlikely to be justified for the possible benefits, given there have been two Bethnal Green stations in operation for many years. TfL will keep this matter under consideration and review passenger feedback on this issue.
Night Buses in Barking & Dagenham
Question No:2015/1290
John Biggs
This borough is currently poorly served by night bus routes. What plans do you have to improve coverage?
The Mayor
TfL currently operate four night bus routes through Barking & Dagenham:
•N15 operates from Trafalgar Square to Romford Market with a night time frequency of every 7-8 minutes Monday-Saturdays and every 10 minutes on Sundays.
•N86 operates from Stratford to Romford with a night time frequency of every 30 minutes.
•Route 128 operates 24 hours from Clayberry Broadway to Romford with a night time frequency of every 30 minutes.
•Route EL1 operates 24 hours from Ilford Broadway to Barking Riverside with a night time frequency of every 30 minutes.
Night bus services in Barking and Dagenham have been reviewed in response to Night Tube.
Consultation started on 19 May 2015 and includes proposals for new night services on routes 145, 238 and 296.
TfL will continue to keep the bus network under regular review to ensure sufficient capacity is provided.
Question No:2015/1290
John Biggs
This borough is currently poorly served by night bus routes. What plans do you have to improve coverage?
The Mayor
TfL currently operate four night bus routes through Barking & Dagenham:
•N15 operates from Trafalgar Square to Romford Market with a night time frequency of every 7-8 minutes Monday-Saturdays and every 10 minutes on Sundays.
•N86 operates from Stratford to Romford with a night time frequency of every 30 minutes.
•Route 128 operates 24 hours from Clayberry Broadway to Romford with a night time frequency of every 30 minutes.
•Route EL1 operates 24 hours from Ilford Broadway to Barking Riverside with a night time frequency of every 30 minutes.
Night bus services in Barking and Dagenham have been reviewed in response to Night Tube.
Consultation started on 19 May 2015 and includes proposals for new night services on routes 145, 238 and 296.
TfL will continue to keep the bus network under regular review to ensure sufficient capacity is provided.
And yes I know the N15 frequency is wrong as is "Clayberry" but I'm copying what TfL wrote!
No 263
Question No: 2015/1320
Andrew Dismore
Would you support increasing the frequency of the no 236 bus service especially as it is the only service between East Finchley and North Finchley?
The Mayor
Following a detailed review and public consultation, route 263 was extended from Holloway, Nag's Head to Highbury Barn on 26 July 2014.
Due to bridge replacement works on Holloway Road, TfL introduced a new schedule to improve reliability in August 2014 on Monday to Saturdays to give buses more time to complete their journeys.
Capacity is sufficient to meet current levels of demand on route 263 with a bus scheduled every 10 minutes Monday-Saturday day times with an additional journey towards Barnet on school days only. On Sundays and all evenings there is a bus every 12 minutes. TfL therefore has no further plans to change the frequency, but will keep the route under regular review.
Question No: 2015/1320
Andrew Dismore
Would you support increasing the frequency of the no 236 bus service especially as it is the only service between East Finchley and North Finchley?
The Mayor
Following a detailed review and public consultation, route 263 was extended from Holloway, Nag's Head to Highbury Barn on 26 July 2014.
Due to bridge replacement works on Holloway Road, TfL introduced a new schedule to improve reliability in August 2014 on Monday to Saturdays to give buses more time to complete their journeys.
Capacity is sufficient to meet current levels of demand on route 263 with a bus scheduled every 10 minutes Monday-Saturday day times with an additional journey towards Barnet on school days only. On Sundays and all evenings there is a bus every 12 minutes. TfL therefore has no further plans to change the frequency, but will keep the route under regular review.
Camden Town Underground Station
Question No:2015/1322
Andrew Dismore
TfL have informed me that the urgently needed improvements to ease congestion at Camden Underground Station will not be complete until 2020. This is a key tourist site and an important hub for the local community. Can the Mayor move the works forward to offer the people of Camden some relief from the daily congestion?
The Mayor
I agree entirely that this work is urgent. That is why LU has been actively engaged with Camden Council to reactive. I support TfL in its current efforts to deliver the modernisation of Camden Town Underground station as soon as possible. Subject to funding and permissions, this scheme will be delivered in the early 2020s. This timetable is partly driven by Camden's requirements and its planning process. Please refer to MQ2015/0590 Holborn and Camden Town tube (February2015) for further details.
Question No:2015/1322
Andrew Dismore
TfL have informed me that the urgently needed improvements to ease congestion at Camden Underground Station will not be complete until 2020. This is a key tourist site and an important hub for the local community. Can the Mayor move the works forward to offer the people of Camden some relief from the daily congestion?
The Mayor
I agree entirely that this work is urgent. That is why LU has been actively engaged with Camden Council to reactive. I support TfL in its current efforts to deliver the modernisation of Camden Town Underground station as soon as possible. Subject to funding and permissions, this scheme will be delivered in the early 2020s. This timetable is partly driven by Camden's requirements and its planning process. Please refer to MQ2015/0590 Holborn and Camden Town tube (February2015) for further details.
Congestion on South Circular
Question No:2015/1324
Len Duvall
Please give an update on any plans or discussions with LB Lewisham regarding measures to tackle congestion on the South Circular through Catford town centre and in particular along Stanstead Road, particularly as the Catford Green development is now under construction?
The Mayor
TfL is working with London Borough (LB) Lewisham to investigate ways to improve transport provision and support the development of Catford Town Centre.
The next phase of this work is to ensure the proposals for the road layout support the London Borough's regeneration aspirations and are in line with the Local Plan. We expect this phase of feasibility work will commence when LB Lewisham have completed their regeneration study later this year.
TfL is also upgrading the operation of two sets of traffic signals approaching Catford Gyratory to dynamic control through the SCOOT programme. SCOOT technology is proven to reduce traffic delays at a junction by around 12 per cent, which will help to manage congestion on the South Circular at this location.
Question No:2015/1324
Len Duvall
Please give an update on any plans or discussions with LB Lewisham regarding measures to tackle congestion on the South Circular through Catford town centre and in particular along Stanstead Road, particularly as the Catford Green development is now under construction?
The Mayor
TfL is working with London Borough (LB) Lewisham to investigate ways to improve transport provision and support the development of Catford Town Centre.
The next phase of this work is to ensure the proposals for the road layout support the London Borough's regeneration aspirations and are in line with the Local Plan. We expect this phase of feasibility work will commence when LB Lewisham have completed their regeneration study later this year.
TfL is also upgrading the operation of two sets of traffic signals approaching Catford Gyratory to dynamic control through the SCOOT programme. SCOOT technology is proven to reduce traffic delays at a junction by around 12 per cent, which will help to manage congestion on the South Circular at this location.
Extending London Overground to Thamesmead and Bexley Riverside
Question No:2015/1325
Len Duvall
Why will TfL not consult on the principle of extending London Overground across the River Thames from Barking Riverside? Is this not a waste of an opportunity and money?
The Mayor
I'm sure we can agree that the extension of the London Overground to Barking Riverside is essential because it unlocks the full 11,000 homes potential of the Barking Riverside site. The scheme is making good progress towards implementation in 2020 with a full funding package and a second consultation currently underway. I agree that we also want to see an extension across the river. That is why it was included in my London Infrastructure Plan 2050 and passive provision is being made for such a future scheme. TfL is also actively investigating alignment and feasibility.
Question No:2015/1325
Len Duvall
Why will TfL not consult on the principle of extending London Overground across the River Thames from Barking Riverside? Is this not a waste of an opportunity and money?
The Mayor
I'm sure we can agree that the extension of the London Overground to Barking Riverside is essential because it unlocks the full 11,000 homes potential of the Barking Riverside site. The scheme is making good progress towards implementation in 2020 with a full funding package and a second consultation currently underway. I agree that we also want to see an extension across the river. That is why it was included in my London Infrastructure Plan 2050 and passive provision is being made for such a future scheme. TfL is also actively investigating alignment and feasibility.
Bus capacity and school children in Catford
Question No:2015/1326
Len Duvall
I have had anecdotal reports that buses through Rushey Green / Bromley Road through the Catford / Downham areas are becoming very overcrowded at the end of the school day due to large numbers of school children boarding the buses. Has this been reviewed recently and what action can be taken to improve this situation?
The Mayor
TfL is aware of reliability issues around the Catford / Downham are as due to the ongoing roadworks currently taking place in and around Lewisham which will impact upon capacity of routes serving this area. Additional resource is proposed for route 336 towards Catford to help improve reliability. Capacity in this area will be further reviewed in September when th enew school term begins.
Question No:2015/1326
Len Duvall
I have had anecdotal reports that buses through Rushey Green / Bromley Road through the Catford / Downham areas are becoming very overcrowded at the end of the school day due to large numbers of school children boarding the buses. Has this been reviewed recently and what action can be taken to improve this situation?
The Mayor
TfL is aware of reliability issues around the Catford / Downham are as due to the ongoing roadworks currently taking place in and around Lewisham which will impact upon capacity of routes serving this area. Additional resource is proposed for route 336 towards Catford to help improve reliability. Capacity in this area will be further reviewed in September when th enew school term begins.
Crossrail and bus services at Abbey Wood
Question No:2015/1327
Len Duvall
Please outline TfL's plans for bus route upgrades both in Greenwich and Bexley to provide effective access for residents to Crossrail.
The Mayor
Crossrail services will start running from 2018. It is expected that there will be changes to bus services in the Abbey Wood area and TfL is examining both changes to capacity and the possibility of new links. No specific plans are available yet. TfL will continue to engage with stakeholders as plans for changes are developed.
Question No:2015/1327
Len Duvall
Please outline TfL's plans for bus route upgrades both in Greenwich and Bexley to provide effective access for residents to Crossrail.
The Mayor
Crossrail services will start running from 2018. It is expected that there will be changes to bus services in the Abbey Wood area and TfL is examining both changes to capacity and the possibility of new links. No specific plans are available yet. TfL will continue to engage with stakeholders as plans for changes are developed.
178 Bus at Kidbrooke Village
Question No:2015/1328
Len Duvall
Please update us on progress in attempts to ensure the 178 bus continues to serve the Brook Estate and other residents neighbouring Kidbrooke Village.
The Mayor
Route 178 will continue to serve the Brook Estate and Kidbrooke Village. If suitable changes are made to the road layout in the estate, achieved through the planning approval process as the development progresses, TfL would consider an alternative, improved, alignment for route 178 through Kidbrooke Village.
Question No:2015/1328
Len Duvall
Please update us on progress in attempts to ensure the 178 bus continues to serve the Brook Estate and other residents neighbouring Kidbrooke Village.
The Mayor
Route 178 will continue to serve the Brook Estate and Kidbrooke Village. If suitable changes are made to the road layout in the estate, achieved through the planning approval process as the development progresses, TfL would consider an alternative, improved, alignment for route 178 through Kidbrooke Village.
Lewisham Gateway : Removal of Bus Stops on Lewisham High Street
Question No:2015/1329
Len Duvall
On what basis did Transport for London agree to the removal of two bus stop sfrom Lewisham High Street?
The Mayor
The Lewisham Gateway Planning Application (including detailed approval for the highway layout) was approved by Lewisham Council and I in 2009. Lewisham Gateway aims to transform the area between the Network Rail station and town centre, provide new jobs, shops and approximately 800 residential units and an improved bus interchange.
In 2012, developers approached TfL with regard to implementing the approved highway layout. The developer undertook more detailed analysis of the proposal which showed that there were likely to be delays on Lewisham High Street, heading towards New Cross, of up to 10 minutes in the evening peak. In order to minimise these delays to buses and general traffic, while providing facilities for cyclists and pedestrians and staying within the boundary set by the Planning permission, it was agreed that 3 lanes northbound and 1 lane southbound provided the best balance for all road users on Lewisham High Street.
As a result of having to provide a single southbound lane, the bus stops outside the police stationhavebeenrelocated to Molesworth Street, which is accessible via a controlled crossing. The Developer has worked with TfL and LB Lewisham to keep Lewisham moving, working and trading during the construction works. The new road layout and the removal of the roundabout is due to be completed and in use in early 2016.
Question No:2015/1329
Len Duvall
On what basis did Transport for London agree to the removal of two bus stop sfrom Lewisham High Street?
The Mayor
The Lewisham Gateway Planning Application (including detailed approval for the highway layout) was approved by Lewisham Council and I in 2009. Lewisham Gateway aims to transform the area between the Network Rail station and town centre, provide new jobs, shops and approximately 800 residential units and an improved bus interchange.
In 2012, developers approached TfL with regard to implementing the approved highway layout. The developer undertook more detailed analysis of the proposal which showed that there were likely to be delays on Lewisham High Street, heading towards New Cross, of up to 10 minutes in the evening peak. In order to minimise these delays to buses and general traffic, while providing facilities for cyclists and pedestrians and staying within the boundary set by the Planning permission, it was agreed that 3 lanes northbound and 1 lane southbound provided the best balance for all road users on Lewisham High Street.
As a result of having to provide a single southbound lane, the bus stops outside the police stationhavebeenrelocated to Molesworth Street, which is accessible via a controlled crossing. The Developer has worked with TfL and LB Lewisham to keep Lewisham moving, working and trading during the construction works. The new road layout and the removal of the roundabout is due to be completed and in use in early 2016.
Redirection of the 386 bus
Question No:2015/1331
Len Duvall
Will TfL listen to the petition presented by local residents and re-instate the old 386 route out of Blackheath in the direction of Woolwich?
The Mayor
Route 386 was rerouted on July 2013. Fewer than 10 people per day were using this route on Hare and BilletRoad.Morethanthreetimesas many passengers use the new stops served by the route following the service change. Consultation responses to the proposal can be found on the link below.
consultations.tfl.gov.uk/buses/route-386/consult_view
Following an extensive search, TfL have not been able to find any petition regarding route 386. I have asked the appropriate TfL officer to contact your office directly to arrange for the petition to be submitted.
Question No:2015/1331
Len Duvall
Will TfL listen to the petition presented by local residents and re-instate the old 386 route out of Blackheath in the direction of Woolwich?
The Mayor
Route 386 was rerouted on July 2013. Fewer than 10 people per day were using this route on Hare and BilletRoad.Morethanthreetimesas many passengers use the new stops served by the route following the service change. Consultation responses to the proposal can be found on the link below.
consultations.tfl.gov.uk/buses/route-386/consult_view
Following an extensive search, TfL have not been able to find any petition regarding route 386. I have asked the appropriate TfL officer to contact your office directly to arrange for the petition to be submitted.
Double decker buses on Rushout and Northwick Avenue(1)
Question No:2015/1390
Navin Shah
Residents have been repeatedly reassured that TfL do not intend to run double decker buses in our small residential roads despite this commitment the H18 today is running as a double decker bus. How will this be achieved?
The Mayor
TfL increased the frequencies of routes H18 and H19 to a bus every 20 minutes in August 2013. Converting both routes to double deck operation was also evaluated but not considered the best way of providing the required capacity.
Earlier in the year, the operator used double deck buses as an emergency measure to maintain levels of service following mechanical issues on the single decker fleet. These issues have now been resolved and the operator has been instructed to only use single deck vehicles.
Question No:2015/1390
Navin Shah
Residents have been repeatedly reassured that TfL do not intend to run double decker buses in our small residential roads despite this commitment the H18 today is running as a double decker bus. How will this be achieved?
The Mayor
TfL increased the frequencies of routes H18 and H19 to a bus every 20 minutes in August 2013. Converting both routes to double deck operation was also evaluated but not considered the best way of providing the required capacity.
Earlier in the year, the operator used double deck buses as an emergency measure to maintain levels of service following mechanical issues on the single decker fleet. These issues have now been resolved and the operator has been instructed to only use single deck vehicles.
Brent Cross Midland Main Line Station(2)
Question No:2015/1400
Navin Shah
From your knowledge of discussions, how many platforms have been proposed at any time since 2010 for the new station, and when?
Will the station be decked, to allow above - track commercial development? Is the extra cost of decking thought to be recoverable from future developers, beyond their Section 106 and CIL commitments?
The Mayor
At this early stage of development my understanding is that five platforms are currently proposed at the new station. No decision has yet been taken whether it should include a deck to enable development over the station or funding options for such a proposal. Barnet Council and Network Rail expect to progress the project to GRIP stage 3 option selection by autumn 2015.
Question No:2015/1400
Navin Shah
From your knowledge of discussions, how many platforms have been proposed at any time since 2010 for the new station, and when?
Will the station be decked, to allow above - track commercial development? Is the extra cost of decking thought to be recoverable from future developers, beyond their Section 106 and CIL commitments?
The Mayor
At this early stage of development my understanding is that five platforms are currently proposed at the new station. No decision has yet been taken whether it should include a deck to enable development over the station or funding options for such a proposal. Barnet Council and Network Rail expect to progress the project to GRIP stage 3 option selection by autumn 2015.
Brent Cross Midland Main Line Station(3)
Question No:2015/1401
Navin Shah
You have published unfunded aspirations for a new London Overground service from Old Oak Common,via Brent Cross,to Hendon and, bordering the Colindale opportunity area,to Mill Hill Broadway. Does the specification for the new Brent Cross station include space for platforms on the Midland Main Line freight tracks for this service, even if platforms were added later?
The Mayor
I assume that you are referring to the Old Oak Overground stations study which did not explicitly include any proposals to run services on the Dudding Hill Line to Brent Cross, but did state that any future passenger services on the Dudding Hill Line would not be excluded.
That said, the specification for the new Brent Cross station will not include platforms on the Midland Main line freight tracks. However, it may be possible to add platforms at a later date, subject to further engineering feasibility.
Question No:2015/1401
Navin Shah
You have published unfunded aspirations for a new London Overground service from Old Oak Common,via Brent Cross,to Hendon and, bordering the Colindale opportunity area,to Mill Hill Broadway. Does the specification for the new Brent Cross station include space for platforms on the Midland Main Line freight tracks for this service, even if platforms were added later?
The Mayor
I assume that you are referring to the Old Oak Overground stations study which did not explicitly include any proposals to run services on the Dudding Hill Line to Brent Cross, but did state that any future passenger services on the Dudding Hill Line would not be excluded.
That said, the specification for the new Brent Cross station will not include platforms on the Midland Main line freight tracks. However, it may be possible to add platforms at a later date, subject to further engineering feasibility.
New Bus for London design issues
Question No:2015/1406
Valerie Shawcross
I have been contacted by a constituent who has asked me to put the following point to you regarding the design and layout of the New Bus for London vehicles and I would be grateful for a response which I can pass to them:
'The much promoted get on and off facility rarely works as there often seem not to be conductors and therefore the back doors are shut most of the time- at least that is how it appears. The seating is poorly designed and uncomfortable and the space occupied by two stairways seems counter-productive.'
The Mayor
The New Routemaster scores three points higher than standard buses in the fleet in customer satisfaction surveys during 2014 which shows how popular it is. The three entry points offer efficient boarding and alighting at stops and the two staircases are an advantage as they help reduce passengers moving in opposite directions to and from the upper deck on all routes on which they are deployed. The versatility of the vehicle enables it to be operated with a second crew member at the busiest times (typically 6am to 7pm on weekdays)on routes where they give the greatest passenger benefit. The seats are ergonomically designed with cushioning and some with higher seat backs than normal. So, although I regret to hear your constituent finds fault with them, I would stress the design features find more merit with passengers at large.
Question No:2015/1406
Valerie Shawcross
I have been contacted by a constituent who has asked me to put the following point to you regarding the design and layout of the New Bus for London vehicles and I would be grateful for a response which I can pass to them:
'The much promoted get on and off facility rarely works as there often seem not to be conductors and therefore the back doors are shut most of the time- at least that is how it appears. The seating is poorly designed and uncomfortable and the space occupied by two stairways seems counter-productive.'
The Mayor
The New Routemaster scores three points higher than standard buses in the fleet in customer satisfaction surveys during 2014 which shows how popular it is. The three entry points offer efficient boarding and alighting at stops and the two staircases are an advantage as they help reduce passengers moving in opposite directions to and from the upper deck on all routes on which they are deployed. The versatility of the vehicle enables it to be operated with a second crew member at the busiest times (typically 6am to 7pm on weekdays)on routes where they give the greatest passenger benefit. The seats are ergonomically designed with cushioning and some with higher seat backs than normal. So, although I regret to hear your constituent finds fault with them, I would stress the design features find more merit with passengers at large.
Night Tube Passenger Assessment
Question No:2015/1412
Valerie Shawcross
What assessment was made of the average passenger numbers on a Friday and Saturday night in preparation for the capacity of the Night Tube?
The Mayor
LU analysed demand on bus routes that parallel Tube lines, to assess how many people might shift from the Night Bus routes to Night Tube, as well as possible shift in demand from taxi and private hire vehicles which would be lower. LU also analysed how much demand would be generated, as experience from service upgrades shows that a reduction in journey time will generate additional demand.
Question No:2015/1412
Valerie Shawcross
What assessment was made of the average passenger numbers on a Friday and Saturday night in preparation for the capacity of the Night Tube?
The Mayor
LU analysed demand on bus routes that parallel Tube lines, to assess how many people might shift from the Night Bus routes to Night Tube, as well as possible shift in demand from taxi and private hire vehicles which would be lower. LU also analysed how much demand would be generated, as experience from service upgrades shows that a reduction in journey time will generate additional demand.
Fares Reduction of 3%(1)
Question No:2015/1417
Valerie Shawcross
What would the cost of reducing all fares across the network by 3% for one year be to Transport for London?
The Mayor
TfL's total fares revenue is currently about £4.5bn annually. The cost of a 3 percent fare cut for one year, on all TfL services, would be around £135m, assuming that the fare changes are reversed after the one year. With no reversion of prices the £135m becomes a per annum cost for each year that the reduced fares applied. Over the rest of the TfL Business Plan to 2021 that is a loss of £810m. This would inevitably result in cuts to TfL's current plans to improve and expand London's transport network.
TfL reinvests every penny of its income to improve London's transport and keep pace with our rapidly growing population, while keeping fare rises to a minimum.
I have frozen fares in real terms for the past two years. I have been able to do this because TfL is delivering efficiencies of £16bn to 2020/21 through cutting back office functions, exploiting new technology and delivering more efficient customer service. TfL is also raising £3.4bn in commercial income.
As a result, TfL is around 15 percent cheaper to run, and continues to work hard to cut costs and raise even more commercial revenues.
Question No:2015/1417
Valerie Shawcross
What would the cost of reducing all fares across the network by 3% for one year be to Transport for London?
The Mayor
TfL's total fares revenue is currently about £4.5bn annually. The cost of a 3 percent fare cut for one year, on all TfL services, would be around £135m, assuming that the fare changes are reversed after the one year. With no reversion of prices the £135m becomes a per annum cost for each year that the reduced fares applied. Over the rest of the TfL Business Plan to 2021 that is a loss of £810m. This would inevitably result in cuts to TfL's current plans to improve and expand London's transport network.
TfL reinvests every penny of its income to improve London's transport and keep pace with our rapidly growing population, while keeping fare rises to a minimum.
I have frozen fares in real terms for the past two years. I have been able to do this because TfL is delivering efficiencies of £16bn to 2020/21 through cutting back office functions, exploiting new technology and delivering more efficient customer service. TfL is also raising £3.4bn in commercial income.
As a result, TfL is around 15 percent cheaper to run, and continues to work hard to cut costs and raise even more commercial revenues.
Fares Reduction of 3%(2)
Question No:2015/1418
Valerie Shawcross
What is the average cost of running a Night Bus service?
The Mayor
For financial year 2012/13 the total cost of running the night bus network was £56,560,000. The average cost in 2012/13 was approximately £2.90 per km operated.
Question No:2015/1418
Valerie Shawcross
What is the average cost of running a Night Bus service?
The Mayor
For financial year 2012/13 the total cost of running the night bus network was £56,560,000. The average cost in 2012/13 was approximately £2.90 per km operated.
Fares Reduction of 3%(3)
Question No:2015/1419
Valerie Shawcross
The new contract with Santander is to commit "an additional £1m a year to promote and improve Santander Cycles" (Keith Moor, Mayor Watch,'Santander : We're committed to improving London's cycle hire scheme', March 6th 2015). What projects or promotions are currently planned for this additional funding?
The Mayor
TfL and Santander have agreed to a joint governance structure for the £1m activation fund, which will be used forevents,offers and advertising, as well as product innovation that will make the scheme more fun,rewarding and easy to use. TfL expect some of these promotions to be agreed and launched this summer.
Question No:2015/1419
Valerie Shawcross
The new contract with Santander is to commit "an additional £1m a year to promote and improve Santander Cycles" (Keith Moor, Mayor Watch,'Santander : We're committed to improving London's cycle hire scheme', March 6th 2015). What projects or promotions are currently planned for this additional funding?
The Mayor
TfL and Santander have agreed to a joint governance structure for the £1m activation fund, which will be used forevents,offers and advertising, as well as product innovation that will make the scheme more fun,rewarding and easy to use. TfL expect some of these promotions to be agreed and launched this summer.
Zone 1-6 Travelcard
Question No:2015/1422
Valerie Shawcross
Since last yearthe price of an adult one day off-peak travel card from Zone 1-6 has increased by 35%, from £8.90 to£12. Please could you provide the number of passengers per day who purchased a Zone 1-6 Day Travelcard in the year 2014?
The Mayor
65,000.
Question No:2015/1422
Valerie Shawcross
Since last yearthe price of an adult one day off-peak travel card from Zone 1-6 has increased by 35%, from £8.90 to£12. Please could you provide the number of passengers per day who purchased a Zone 1-6 Day Travelcard in the year 2014?
The Mayor
65,000.
Electronic Brakes on Routemaster(1)
Question No:2015/1424
Valerie Shawcross
What safety assessments have taken place since this incident to ensure that the electronic brake does not fail again on the Routemasterbus?
The Mayor
There have been no instances of electronic brake system (EBS) failure on New Routemasters. The brake system is standard on more than 400,000 commercial vehicles throughout the UK and Europe and is not unique to this London bus.
A vehicle is tested after any substantive allegation but there have been no occasions when brake systems have been found to be faulty. The New Routemaster has passed all brake tests and complies with braking directive 71/320/EC (as amended to 2002/78/EC) and also ECE regulation 13.11 and continues to be fully fit for purpose and a safe form of transport.
On the vehicle there are three separate braking circuits. One for the front axle, one for the rear and one for the handbrake. These are independent of each other, each with their own air pressure reservoir. A loss of air on one set of brakes will not affect the others. The handbrake circuit has an additional fail-safe feature that requires air pressure to keep it unengaged. If air pressure is lost, the handbrake will activate and stop the vehicle. The design principle being that at no point will the vehicle be left without a brake able to bring the vehicle to a stop. If a driver thought the brakes had failed, he or she could use the handbrake to release air pressure from the system and apply the brakes.
Bus operators in London have robust reporting arrangements for highlighting potential engineering issues. Any confirmed defect reported to Wrightbus for repair would be recorded to capture fault details, and length of time to rectify. As there have been no brake failures, Wrightbus has no defect reports of this nature.
There are a number of safeguards in place to ensure all vehicles contracted to provide TfL services in London are properly maintained. Prior to starting a shift, drivers will conduct a first use check of the vehicle including the air system as a precaution. The operators routinely inspect vehicles every four to six weeks and TfL assures itself as to maintenance quality by independently inspecting around a quarter of the fleet each year. Each year, like any other vehicle on the public highway, buses must also pass a Ministry of Transport test (or MOT) but at a more stringent level including an assessment of the braking systems.
Question No:2015/1424
Valerie Shawcross
What safety assessments have taken place since this incident to ensure that the electronic brake does not fail again on the Routemasterbus?
The Mayor
There have been no instances of electronic brake system (EBS) failure on New Routemasters. The brake system is standard on more than 400,000 commercial vehicles throughout the UK and Europe and is not unique to this London bus.
A vehicle is tested after any substantive allegation but there have been no occasions when brake systems have been found to be faulty. The New Routemaster has passed all brake tests and complies with braking directive 71/320/EC (as amended to 2002/78/EC) and also ECE regulation 13.11 and continues to be fully fit for purpose and a safe form of transport.
On the vehicle there are three separate braking circuits. One for the front axle, one for the rear and one for the handbrake. These are independent of each other, each with their own air pressure reservoir. A loss of air on one set of brakes will not affect the others. The handbrake circuit has an additional fail-safe feature that requires air pressure to keep it unengaged. If air pressure is lost, the handbrake will activate and stop the vehicle. The design principle being that at no point will the vehicle be left without a brake able to bring the vehicle to a stop. If a driver thought the brakes had failed, he or she could use the handbrake to release air pressure from the system and apply the brakes.
Bus operators in London have robust reporting arrangements for highlighting potential engineering issues. Any confirmed defect reported to Wrightbus for repair would be recorded to capture fault details, and length of time to rectify. As there have been no brake failures, Wrightbus has no defect reports of this nature.
There are a number of safeguards in place to ensure all vehicles contracted to provide TfL services in London are properly maintained. Prior to starting a shift, drivers will conduct a first use check of the vehicle including the air system as a precaution. The operators routinely inspect vehicles every four to six weeks and TfL assures itself as to maintenance quality by independently inspecting around a quarter of the fleet each year. Each year, like any other vehicle on the public highway, buses must also pass a Ministry of Transport test (or MOT) but at a more stringent level including an assessment of the braking systems.
Electronic Brakes on Routemaster(2)
Question No:2015/1425
Valerie Shawcross
What are the current safety measures or emergency procedures are there on the Routemaster buses to ensure the electronic brake can be manually over-ridden if necessary?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ2015/1424.
Question No:2015/1425
Valerie Shawcross
What are the current safety measures or emergency procedures are there on the Routemaster buses to ensure the electronic brake can be manually over-ridden if necessary?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ2015/1424.
Electronic Brakes on Routemaster(3)
Question No:2015/1426
Valerie Shawcross
Since 2012, how many incidences have been reported where the electronic brakes have been recorded as faulty or damaged? Please break this down per month.
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ2015/1424.
Electronic Brakes on Routemaster(4)
Question No:2015/1427
Valerie Shawcross
What recording methods are in place for gathering and maintaining instances of electronic brakes on Routemasters being faulty?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ2015/1424.
Question No:2015/1426
Valerie Shawcross
Since 2012, how many incidences have been reported where the electronic brakes have been recorded as faulty or damaged? Please break this down per month.
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ2015/1424.
Electronic Brakes on Routemaster(4)
Question No:2015/1427
Valerie Shawcross
What recording methods are in place for gathering and maintaining instances of electronic brakes on Routemasters being faulty?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ2015/1424.
DLR Trains from Beckton
Question No:2015/1458
Andrew Boff
Would the Mayor consider running direct DLR trains from Beckton to Stratford International?
The Mayor
The DLR timetable change in February 2015 is the first in a series of improvements over the next two to three years that will eventually result in a five-minute service operating across the DLR network.
TfL is carrying out this service enhancement in stages, to ensure that service reliability is not adversely affected. This means that passengers on some parts of the network have been inconvenienced for a short period of time. These difficult decisions were taken based upon the relative demand between different parts of the network - both current and predicted.
As a consequence of this change, it was necessary to temporarily withdraw direct services between Stratford International and Beckton, meaning that passengers need to change at Canning Town. This service will be reinstated in due course. However, the dates are yet to be confirmed.
Plans are also being developed to resume a five-minute service during early mornings and evening periods between Canning Town and Beckton; this is likely to occur before reinstatement of the direct service.
Question No:2015/1458
Andrew Boff
Would the Mayor consider running direct DLR trains from Beckton to Stratford International?
The Mayor
The DLR timetable change in February 2015 is the first in a series of improvements over the next two to three years that will eventually result in a five-minute service operating across the DLR network.
TfL is carrying out this service enhancement in stages, to ensure that service reliability is not adversely affected. This means that passengers on some parts of the network have been inconvenienced for a short period of time. These difficult decisions were taken based upon the relative demand between different parts of the network - both current and predicted.
As a consequence of this change, it was necessary to temporarily withdraw direct services between Stratford International and Beckton, meaning that passengers need to change at Canning Town. This service will be reinstated in due course. However, the dates are yet to be confirmed.
Plans are also being developed to resume a five-minute service during early mornings and evening periods between Canning Town and Beckton; this is likely to occur before reinstatement of the direct service.
Royal Docks Buses
Question No:2015/1460
Andrew Boff
Given the impressive speed of development of the Royal Docks, how frequently are local bus routes reviewed in order to ensure they meet the needs of local residents?
The Mayor
TfL is working closely with the London Borough of Newham to review services to ensure they meet the needs of local residents in the Royal Docks area. A map of the proposed changes will be sent directly to your office. TfL would be happy to provide more detail on these proposals if required. TfL will continue to keep the bus service under regular review to ensure sufficient capacity is provided.
Question No:2015/1460
Andrew Boff
Given the impressive speed of development of the Royal Docks, how frequently are local bus routes reviewed in order to ensure they meet the needs of local residents?
The Mayor
TfL is working closely with the London Borough of Newham to review services to ensure they meet the needs of local residents in the Royal Docks area. A map of the proposed changes will be sent directly to your office. TfL would be happy to provide more detail on these proposals if required. TfL will continue to keep the bus service under regular review to ensure sufficient capacity is provided.
Road Works in Central London
Question No:2015/1469
Kit Malthouse
Do you feel that the current level of disruption to road traffic caused by the unprecedented number of roadworks in central London is acceptable?
The Mayor
Working together with London's boroughs, TfL is leading an unprecedented programme of planned road improvements and transformations. The Road Modernisation Plan includes hundreds of transformational projects designed to radically improve living and travelling conditions through safer, greener and more attractive streets and town centres, and safer conditions for cyclists and pedestrians. At the same time, we are seeing the continued development of our city by private investors at locations such as Battersea, and an intensive programme of investment by utility companies to accommodate this growth across the capital.
This level of works across London will inevitably lead to some disruption for road users. To mitigate this, TfL has an established programme which coordinates all works across the network to ensure that disruption is kept to a minimum. They have actively engaged with the boroughs, business and freight industry and the general public to encourage road users to check before they travel and are providing extensive advice on how to plan journeys to avoid disruption.
In order to manage the traffic in central London, around construction sites and at specific locations across London where there is potential for a larger impact, an active traffic management strategy is being deployed. This strategy will use traffic signals to balance traffic flows across London according to available capacity to ensure that key junctions and gyratories do not 'lockup' and that the bus network continues to operate effectively.
Question No:2015/1469
Kit Malthouse
Do you feel that the current level of disruption to road traffic caused by the unprecedented number of roadworks in central London is acceptable?
The Mayor
Working together with London's boroughs, TfL is leading an unprecedented programme of planned road improvements and transformations. The Road Modernisation Plan includes hundreds of transformational projects designed to radically improve living and travelling conditions through safer, greener and more attractive streets and town centres, and safer conditions for cyclists and pedestrians. At the same time, we are seeing the continued development of our city by private investors at locations such as Battersea, and an intensive programme of investment by utility companies to accommodate this growth across the capital.
This level of works across London will inevitably lead to some disruption for road users. To mitigate this, TfL has an established programme which coordinates all works across the network to ensure that disruption is kept to a minimum. They have actively engaged with the boroughs, business and freight industry and the general public to encourage road users to check before they travel and are providing extensive advice on how to plan journeys to avoid disruption.
In order to manage the traffic in central London, around construction sites and at specific locations across London where there is potential for a larger impact, an active traffic management strategy is being deployed. This strategy will use traffic signals to balance traffic flows across London according to available capacity to ensure that key junctions and gyratories do not 'lockup' and that the bus network continues to operate effectively.
Installation of Spiral Escalators in Tube Stations
Question No:2015/1470
Kit Malthouse
What work has been undertaken by TfL to consider the installation of spiral escalators in stations that currently have spiral staircases and lifts such as Covent Garden?
The Mayor
The installation of spiral escalators would have limited application in the London Underground environment. TfL has looked at this TfL's lift and escalator engineers do not believe that modern spiral escalator design could be accommodated in the tight spaces available or that their installation would improve the capacity of any of the current stations or reduce journey times.
Deep level stations such as Covent Garden and Hampstead, that have both lifts and spiral staircases, use the staircase as primary emergency evacuation routes, and replacing them with a spiral escalator could also impact on customer evacuation procedures and times.
Question No:2015/1470
Kit Malthouse
What work has been undertaken by TfL to consider the installation of spiral escalators in stations that currently have spiral staircases and lifts such as Covent Garden?
The Mayor
The installation of spiral escalators would have limited application in the London Underground environment. TfL has looked at this TfL's lift and escalator engineers do not believe that modern spiral escalator design could be accommodated in the tight spaces available or that their installation would improve the capacity of any of the current stations or reduce journey times.
Deep level stations such as Covent Garden and Hampstead, that have both lifts and spiral staircases, use the staircase as primary emergency evacuation routes, and replacing them with a spiral escalator could also impact on customer evacuation procedures and times.
Direct bus service from Sutton to Epsom Hospital
Question No:2015/1484
Steve O'Connell
TfL have refused a request to run a direct bus service from Sutton to Epsom Hospital as the costs were deemed too high. However I believe a bus route serving a hospital can override budgetary considerations. Do you agree and if so, will you instruct TfL to introduce a direct bus service to and from the hospital?
The Mayor
TfL is currently considering costs for implementing a direct service from Sutton to Epsom Hospital. The most cost effective option requires additional standing space at Epsom Hospital. TfL is in touch with the hospital, and will let you know the outcome of discussions once complete.
Question No:2015/1484
Steve O'Connell
TfL have refused a request to run a direct bus service from Sutton to Epsom Hospital as the costs were deemed too high. However I believe a bus route serving a hospital can override budgetary considerations. Do you agree and if so, will you instruct TfL to introduce a direct bus service to and from the hospital?
The Mayor
TfL is currently considering costs for implementing a direct service from Sutton to Epsom Hospital. The most cost effective option requires additional standing space at Epsom Hospital. TfL is in touch with the hospital, and will let you know the outcome of discussions once complete.
And yes that is the highest paid councillor in the Country saying it is OK to throw away any budgetary concerns in order to run a bus service to a hospital. Talk about rampant hypocrisy.
Bus service from Addiscombe to Croydon University Hospital
Question No:2015/1485
SteveO'Connell
TfL have refused to implement a direct bus service from Addiscombe to Croydon University Hospital on the grounds of prohibitive operational costs. However many hospital patients suffer mobility problems, are elderly and are unable to afford a taxi fare. Do you not agree that these factors should override budgetary constraints and if so, will you instruct TfL to implement a direct bus service to the hospital?
The Mayor
TfL investigated an extension of route 130 to Croydon University Hospital. The additional subsidy required to run the service (approx. £260,000 per annum)is prohibitive considering the number of additional passengers expected to use the service.
TfL will continue to investigate options to implement a cost effective way to provide a direct service from Addiscombe to Croydon University Hospital.
Question No:2015/1485
SteveO'Connell
TfL have refused to implement a direct bus service from Addiscombe to Croydon University Hospital on the grounds of prohibitive operational costs. However many hospital patients suffer mobility problems, are elderly and are unable to afford a taxi fare. Do you not agree that these factors should override budgetary constraints and if so, will you instruct TfL to implement a direct bus service to the hospital?
The Mayor
TfL investigated an extension of route 130 to Croydon University Hospital. The additional subsidy required to run the service (approx. £260,000 per annum)is prohibitive considering the number of additional passengers expected to use the service.
TfL will continue to investigate options to implement a cost effective way to provide a direct service from Addiscombe to Croydon University Hospital.
Oh look another demand for budgets to be ignored just so an AM's constituents can go to hospital? Can we throw all budgets out of the window for bus service changes?
Night tube - potential disruption to residents
Question No:2015/1534
Darren Johnson
Before deciding to go ahead with all night running on five tube lines, did TfL consult people living alongside over land sections of track and those living close to major tube stations to get their views on the potential noise impacts of these changes?
The Mayor
Since plans for Night Tube were first announced in November 2013, TfL has been engaging and working closely with stakeholders across London, including residents, to understand their concerns and minimise any negative impacts of the Night Tube, while also meeting Londoners' demands for extended night-time transport services.
This has included meetings with boroughs across London and with London Councils' forums, as well as communicating directly with concerned residents.
Work is progressing to identify potential noise issues across the Night Tube network and LU is taking steps to address noise levels that are considered unsatisfactory. This involves mapping information on to a Geographical Information System, which can then be used to plan and implement maintenance works to improve the condition of the rails and reduce noise levels.
Once Night Tube is operational, LU will of course continue to work with residents to help resolve any issues. Tube services already run for up to 20 hours each day, and engineering trains often operate overnight too. As such, the potential for disturbance from less frequent night time services on Fridays and Saturdays is expected to be limited.
Question No:2015/1534
Darren Johnson
Before deciding to go ahead with all night running on five tube lines, did TfL consult people living alongside over land sections of track and those living close to major tube stations to get their views on the potential noise impacts of these changes?
The Mayor
Since plans for Night Tube were first announced in November 2013, TfL has been engaging and working closely with stakeholders across London, including residents, to understand their concerns and minimise any negative impacts of the Night Tube, while also meeting Londoners' demands for extended night-time transport services.
This has included meetings with boroughs across London and with London Councils' forums, as well as communicating directly with concerned residents.
Work is progressing to identify potential noise issues across the Night Tube network and LU is taking steps to address noise levels that are considered unsatisfactory. This involves mapping information on to a Geographical Information System, which can then be used to plan and implement maintenance works to improve the condition of the rails and reduce noise levels.
Once Night Tube is operational, LU will of course continue to work with residents to help resolve any issues. Tube services already run for up to 20 hours each day, and engineering trains often operate overnight too. As such, the potential for disturbance from less frequent night time services on Fridays and Saturdays is expected to be limited.
London Overground Class 172 Fleet(1)
Question No:2015/1560
Caroline Pidgeon
Please supply details of the number of failures in service of Class 172 trains for the last six months for each of the following reasons:
1. Failure of Driver Only Operation equipment (including externally mounted CCTV cameras)
2. Failure of external passenger plug doors
3. Failure of train radio
4. Failure for any other defect
The Mayor
London Overground offers high levels of reliability for its passengers. On the Barking to Gospel Oak Line in particular, where Class 172 trains operate, the moving annual average for the public performance measure (PPM) on the route is 97.22. Of the average of 3,812 trains operated on the route in a particular period, very few are subject to mechanical defect.
In the last 6 rail periods, 60 out of 22,872 trains have experienced driver only operation issues. Similarly 4 out of 22,872 trains have been subject to GSM radio and external door issues.
Other train defects for these same 6 periods amounted to 18 in total. This means that 0.38per cent of the services on the Barking to Gospel Oak Line for the periods in question have been subject to these sorts of mechanical defects. An even smaller number have resulted in vehicles being withdrawn from service. LOROL and TfL work closely to ensure services offer high levels of reliability to passengers, and TfL regularly meets with the Barking to Gospel Oak Rail Users'Group to discuss a range of issues and ensure users of the line continue to be well served.
London Overground Class 172 Fleet(2)
Question No:2015/1561
Caroline Pidgeon
Is TfL making arrangements for the continued use of the Angel Trains Class1 72/0 fleet should LOROL not be reappointed to operate the London Rail Concession beyond 2016?
The Mayor
TfL is making arrangements to extend the lease of the Class 172 trains after the current LOROL contract ends in November 2016.
Question No:2015/1560
Caroline Pidgeon
Please supply details of the number of failures in service of Class 172 trains for the last six months for each of the following reasons:
1. Failure of Driver Only Operation equipment (including externally mounted CCTV cameras)
2. Failure of external passenger plug doors
3. Failure of train radio
4. Failure for any other defect
The Mayor
London Overground offers high levels of reliability for its passengers. On the Barking to Gospel Oak Line in particular, where Class 172 trains operate, the moving annual average for the public performance measure (PPM) on the route is 97.22. Of the average of 3,812 trains operated on the route in a particular period, very few are subject to mechanical defect.
In the last 6 rail periods, 60 out of 22,872 trains have experienced driver only operation issues. Similarly 4 out of 22,872 trains have been subject to GSM radio and external door issues.
Other train defects for these same 6 periods amounted to 18 in total. This means that 0.38per cent of the services on the Barking to Gospel Oak Line for the periods in question have been subject to these sorts of mechanical defects. An even smaller number have resulted in vehicles being withdrawn from service. LOROL and TfL work closely to ensure services offer high levels of reliability to passengers, and TfL regularly meets with the Barking to Gospel Oak Rail Users'Group to discuss a range of issues and ensure users of the line continue to be well served.
London Overground Class 172 Fleet(2)
Question No:2015/1561
Caroline Pidgeon
Is TfL making arrangements for the continued use of the Angel Trains Class1 72/0 fleet should LOROL not be reappointed to operate the London Rail Concession beyond 2016?
The Mayor
TfL is making arrangements to extend the lease of the Class 172 trains after the current LOROL contract ends in November 2016.
