|
Post by Dillon95 on Mar 31, 2017 10:44:21 GMT
I'd agree with you there if we could install seats that don't feel like metal shelves That's phase two of that idea - retrofit each OmniCity with the type of seats that Abellio and Stagecoach have on all their E400s. I could sit on those seats all day haha
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Mar 31, 2017 11:59:37 GMT
Agreed! It would be much better if this forum was running things. This gives me ideas... ...such as ban on withdrawing OmniCitys until they're all at least 13 years old Screw that, I'd resurrect the L's, M's & T's that have surrendered to the scrap man and bring them back in service muhahaha.
|
|
|
Post by Dillon95 on Mar 31, 2017 14:27:16 GMT
Would we bring back funky different liveries?
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on May 10, 2017 15:53:58 GMT
Is it a new TfL standard in which new sets have to be in alphabetical order? I've noticed the sets on the 147s Es, the 25s VNs and some of the 62s MMCs seem to have been reblinded with the destinations in alphabetical.
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on May 10, 2017 15:58:38 GMT
Is it a new TfL standard in which new sets have to be in alphabetical order? I've noticed the sets on the 147s Es, the 25s VNs and some of the 62s MMCs seem to have been reblinded with the destinations in alphabetical. They're all in alphabetical order. They always have been.
|
|
|
Post by VPL630 on May 10, 2017 16:02:13 GMT
Is it a new TfL standard in which new sets have to be in alphabetical order? I've noticed the sets on the 147s Es, the 25s VNs and some of the 62s MMCs seem to have been reblinded with the destinations in alphabetical. They are in whatever order the company specify
|
|
|
Post by ibus246 on May 10, 2017 16:07:02 GMT
Is it a new TfL standard in which new sets have to be in alphabetical order? I've noticed the sets on the 147s Es, the 25s VNs and some of the 62s MMCs seem to have been reblinded with the destinations in alphabetical. They're all in alphabetical order. They always have been. Unless routes have gained inserts
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on May 10, 2017 16:41:59 GMT
Is it a new TfL standard in which new sets have to be in alphabetical order? I've noticed the sets on the 147s Es, the 25s VNs and some of the 62s MMCs seem to have been reblinded with the destinations in alphabetical. They're all in alphabetical order. They always have been. They haven't always been in alphabetical. When the 62s MMCs were initially delivered they had the destinations in order of route at the top followed by turns underneath. The blinds on this 2016 MHV aren't in alphabetical either: www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9nnOZjbMVM
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2017 22:31:54 GMT
Managed to find out everything on the BN new blindsets - 19, N19, 50, 133, N133, 319 and 333. As a bonus, here's HA43 blinded for the 19 flic.kr/p/UJuBbi
|
|
|
Post by M1104 on Jun 11, 2017 10:08:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ServerKing on Jun 11, 2017 12:05:21 GMT
I assume they change the whole blind box unit if it goes wrong Still, doesn't stop them tearing or being vague though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2017 20:06:38 GMT
These Central London changes must be costing a small fortune in new blinds. I am guessing the LTs at Holloway needed new sets for the 390 to Victoria but gave a chance to update the older blinds to include 91,168.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jul 15, 2017 20:58:07 GMT
These Central London changes must be costing a small fortune in new blinds. I am guessing the LTs at Holloway needed new sets for the 390 to Victoria but gave a chance to update the older blinds to include 91,168. Would they not just have to order a new side blind only as the 24 serves Victoria so surely the blind can be configured to show Victoria for the 390?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2017 21:36:37 GMT
These Central London changes must be costing a small fortune in new blinds. I am guessing the LTs at Holloway needed new sets for the 390 to Victoria but gave a chance to update the older blinds to include 91,168. Would they not just have to order a new side blind only as the 24 serves Victoria so surely the blind can be configured to show Victoria for the 390? Of course! what was I thinking
|
|
|
Post by Volvo on Jul 22, 2017 8:51:21 GMT
I don't know if this has been touched upon but I really think Waterloo is one of those places that needs qualifiers.
I mean you have 6 different terminus points yet buses just show Waterloo, I do get asked quite alot "where in Waterloo do you go?" Not that I have a problem with that as that is a very good question if you don't know.
They should be
341/381s Waterloo, County Hall 76s Waterloo, Baylis Road 243/521s Waterloo Station, Mepham Street 211/507s Waterloo Station 77s Waterloo Station, Imax Cinema maybe as that's the closest reference point 4/26/139s Waterloo, Waterloo Road
|
|