|
|
Post by kmkcheng on May 9, 2020 23:19:13 GMT
You’ve missed the 292 for Herts
|
|
|
|
Post by kmkcheng on May 9, 2020 23:21:24 GMT
In Hillingdon, 140 is missing and 482 is now Abellio, not Metroline (also same mistake in Hounslow)
|
|
|
|
Post by stuckonthe486 on May 9, 2020 23:30:21 GMT
The 47 just clips inside Greenwich heading towards Bellingham (not the other way) at the Deptford High Street and Deptford Church Street stops. It's a very marginal case, granted :-) edit: spot the tatty old Greenwich sign on the bin at the bus stop: goo.gl/maps/25yQKo69SyF3HCqK6 |
|
|
|
Post by george on May 9, 2020 23:33:00 GMT
The 47 just clips inside Greenwich heading towards Bellingham (not the other way) at the Deptford High Street and Deptford Church Street stops. It's a very marginal case, granted :-) Just to confirm the 47 should be in the Greenwich section? |
|
|
|
Post by stuckonthe486 on May 9, 2020 23:34:44 GMT
The 47 just clips inside Greenwich heading towards Bellingham (not the other way) at the Deptford High Street and Deptford Church Street stops. It's a very marginal case, granted :-) Just to confirm the 47 should be in the Greenwich section? Yep. |
|
|
|
Post by rift on May 10, 2020 0:41:12 GMT
The 47 just clips inside Greenwich heading towards Bellingham (not the other way) at the Deptford High Street and Deptford Church Street stops. It's a very marginal case, granted :-) edit: spot the tatty old Greenwich sign on the bin at the bus stop: goo.gl/maps/25yQKo69SyF3HCqK6 There were boundary changes in this area in 1994, so you’ll need to double check to see if that stop is still in Greenwich. |
|
|
|
Post by WSD3 on May 10, 2020 0:52:02 GMT
For Wandsworth you have Go Ahead London as lose the 29.
|
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on May 10, 2020 1:02:03 GMT
The 47 just clips inside Greenwich heading towards Bellingham (not the other way) at the Deptford High Street and Deptford Church Street stops. It's a very marginal case, granted :-) edit: spot the tatty old Greenwich sign on the bin at the bus stop: goo.gl/maps/25yQKo69SyF3HCqK6 Just to clarify, I go by road rather than pavement hence why the document I sent to george doesn't contain Greenwich for the 47 - Creek Road up to Deptford Church Street is wholly within Lewisham. I know there are similar anomalies that exist like Lambeth bins on Denmark Hill but again, the actual road on that section is wholly within Southwark. Hope that clears things up a little  |
|
|
|
Post by overgroundcommuter on May 10, 2020 2:12:12 GMT
363 should be added for Bromley as you've done for the N63 which stands just inside the borough in Crystal Palace.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2020 8:27:37 GMT
B13 (Arriva) doesn't at all enter Bromley. Bexleyheath, Blendon, Blackfen and parts of Avery Hill that it serves are Bexley and the rest of Avery Hill and New Eltham are Greenwich.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2020 9:58:39 GMT
You've missed 264 from the Arriva sections of both Wandsworth and Sutton. The 50 also enters Wandsworth for a brief period. The 407 also isn't included in the Abellio section of Surrey. 405 should also still be under GoAhead in Surrey section for now The 264 doesn’t cross into Sutton at all. |
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on May 10, 2020 10:01:50 GMT
You've missed 264 from the Arriva sections of both Wandsworth and Sutton. The 50 also enters Wandsworth for a brief period. The 407 also isn't included in the Abellio section of Surrey. 405 should also still be under GoAhead in Surrey section for now The 264 doesn’t cross into Sutton at all. Yes it does, at Redhouse Road between Rochford Way and Watneys Road. I should know as I've lived near there for nearly 20 years. |
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on May 10, 2020 10:09:08 GMT
The 264 doesn’t cross into Sutton at all. Yes it does, at Redhouse Road between Rochford Way and Watneys Road. I should know as I've lived near there for nearly 20 years. Shown here is a Google maps screenshot of Mitcham Road where the 264 runs along. It's taken from Croydon, with Merton visible after the small junction, which comes under Sutton. The car wash site to the left, a few years ago, had an planning application for a new McDonald's (https://www.wimbledonguardian.co.uk/news/11609711.sutton-council-considers-plans-for-a-24-hour-drive-through-mcdonalds-on-the-borders-of-croydon-sutton-and-merton/) The application was made to Sutton council as that section, where the 264 runs, comes under Sutton. Therefore my comment that the 264 runs in Sutton, is correct - as I knew it was! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2020 10:32:53 GMT
Yes it does, at Redhouse Road between Rochford Way and Watneys Road. I should know as I've lived near there for nearly 20 years. Shown here is a Google maps screenshot of Mitcham Road where the 264 runs along. It's taken from Croydon, with Merton visible after the small junction, which comes under Sutton. The car wash site to the left, a few years ago, had an planning application for a new McDonald's (https://www.wimbledonguardian.co.uk/news/11609711.sutton-council-considers-plans-for-a-24-hour-drive-through-mcdonalds-on-the-borders-of-croydon-sutton-and-merton/) The application was made to Sutton council as that section, where the 264 runs, comes under Sutton. Therefore my comment that the 264 runs in Sutton, is correct - as I knew it was! I’m only going by what TfL has under their borough list and they don’t consider the 264 as entering Sutton. If it only enters a junction and doesn’t have a stop in the borough then surely it doesn’t count. |
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on May 10, 2020 10:49:59 GMT
Shown here is a Google maps screenshot of Mitcham Road where the 264 runs along. It's taken from Croydon, with Merton visible after the small junction, which comes under Sutton. The car wash site to the left, a few years ago, had an planning application for a new McDonald's (https://www.wimbledonguardian.co.uk/news/11609711.sutton-council-considers-plans-for-a-24-hour-drive-through-mcdonalds-on-the-borders-of-croydon-sutton-and-merton/) The application was made to Sutton council as that section, where the 264 runs, comes under Sutton. Therefore my comment that the 264 runs in Sutton, is correct - as I knew it was! I’m only going by what TfL has under their borough list and they don’t consider the 264 as entering Sutton. If it only enters a junction and doesn’t have a stop in the borough then surely it doesn’t count. TfL have previously said the 264 enters Sutton on bus service changes documents. Runs through Sutton borough, therefore serves it. |
|
