|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Nov 17, 2020 18:58:30 GMT
Just found this by mistake (when trying to find the 2018/19 one) content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-service-usage-19-20.xlsxTop 10 used routes (From 10th to 1st) 36 11 039 478 38 11 129 599 86 11 422 052 140 11 496 084 25 11 519 095 243 11 527 985 207 11 727 421 29 12 740 791 149 13 224 071 18 15 728 169 |
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Nov 17, 2020 19:03:44 GMT
Just found this by mistake (when trying to find the 2018/19 one) content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-service-usage-19-20.xlsxTop 10 used routes (From 10th to 1st) 36 11 039 478 38 11 129 599 86 11 422 052 140 11 496 084 25 11 519 095 243 11 527 985 207 11 727 421 29 12 740 791 149 13 224 071 18 15 728 169 Am I the only one surprised that 36 is up there? |
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Nov 17, 2020 22:54:12 GMT
Just found this by mistake (when trying to find the 2018/19 one) content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-service-usage-19-20.xlsxTop 10 used routes (From 10th to 1st) 36 11 039 478 38 11 129 599 86 11 422 052 140 11 496 084 25 11 519 095 243 11 527 985 207 11 727 421 29 12 740 791 149 13 224 071 18 15 728 169 Am I the only one surprised that 36 is up there? I think it moved up as a result of the 436 being diverted to Battersea as the main three South London routes were the 12, 53 & 109 but the former two has dropped off patronage wise over the last few years whilst the 109 has remained very steady and the next one behind the 36 in South London. I'd expect the 109 to eventually overtake it the more Central London is meddled with. |
|
|
|
Post by redexpress on Nov 18, 2020 6:40:29 GMT
Omg Route 399 is no longer low usage. The New record low usage is: 9,218 Bottom Route is: 497 Geoff may need to do another video again to ride on bus 497! The 497 is only bottom because this data covers the period April 2019 - March 2020, and the 497 was only introduced in January 2020! According to diamondgeezer's post, if you work out the average weekly usage, the 497 would be 10th bottom, and the 399 would still be bottom of the list. |
|
|
|
Post by lonmark on Nov 18, 2020 6:53:03 GMT
Omg Route 399 is no longer low usage. The New record low usage is: 9,218 Bottom Route is: 497 Geoff may need to do another video again to ride on bus 497! The 497 is only bottom because this data covers the period April 2019 - March 2020, and the 497 was only introduced in January 2020! According to diamondgeezer's post, if you work out the average weekly usage, the 497 would be 10th bottom, and the 399 would still be bottom of the list. ah ok sorry, thank you for let me know. |
|
|
|
Post by northlondonbuses on Nov 19, 2020 19:41:00 GMT
Just found this by mistake (when trying to find the 2018/19 one) content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-service-usage-19-20.xlsxTop 10 used routes (From 10th to 1st) 36 11 039 478 38 11 129 599 86 11 422 052 140 11 496 084 25 11 519 095 243 11 527 985 207 11 727 421 29 12 740 791 149 13 224 071 18 15 728 169 Not surprised at the 29 I've never seen a 29 empty ever during peak times and sometimes off peak |
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Nov 19, 2020 21:52:34 GMT
Just found this by mistake (when trying to find the 2018/19 one) content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-service-usage-19-20.xlsxTop 10 used routes (From 10th to 1st) 36 11 039 478 38 11 129 599 86 11 422 052 140 11 496 084 25 11 519 095 243 11 527 985 207 11 727 421 29 12 740 791 149 13 224 071 18 15 728 169 Not surprised at the 29 I've never seen a 29 empty ever during peak times and sometimes off peak These are the routes that TFL should’ve looked at branding. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 22:05:36 GMT
Not surprised at the 29 I've never seen a 29 empty ever during peak times and sometimes off peak These are the routes that TFL should’ve looked at branding. Why ? If these routes are already busy why would they need branding? |
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Nov 19, 2020 22:08:41 GMT
These are the routes that TFL should’ve looked at branding. Why ? If these routes are already busy why would they need branding? Isn’t the whole point of branding is to highlight the main routes? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 22:11:18 GMT
Why ? If these routes are already busy why would they need branding? Isn’t the whole point of branding is to highlight the main routes? Surely its to encourage more passengers. Don't see the point it encouraging more passengers onto already busy routes. |
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Nov 19, 2020 22:37:02 GMT
Why ? If these routes are already busy why would they need branding? Isn’t the whole point of branding is to highlight the main routes? Branding is usually used to increase patronage generally using a route diagram & frequency as well as show off any landmarks or amenities which help with that aim or to promote ticketing options or costs. That's not to say you can't do it to busy routes as many networks outside of London do this using all kinds of routes - remember the 140 was one of the branded routes in the Hayes trial. |
|
|
|
Post by BK15AZR on Nov 20, 2020 13:14:51 GMT
Looking at the single decker routes, the C10 tops the list this year, followed closely by 235, 316 and W15. The 72, which was top last year, had almost halved in patronage this year...think it's mostly due to the "temporary" cutback due to closure of Hammersmith Bridge?
|
|
|
|
Post by lonmark on Nov 22, 2020 10:03:04 GMT
Top Route of Single decker:
1. C10 4 887 436
2. 235 4 733 301
3. 195 4 731 490
4. 316 4 710 048
5. W15 4 700 456
6. 200 4 152 818 ( i understand this was before change to DD)
7. 276 4 149 795
8. C11 4 069 182
9. 46 4 046 858
10. 80 4 034 589
|
|
|
|
Post by lonmark on Nov 22, 2020 10:10:44 GMT
Top Night Bus Route (except 24hrs routes) :
1. N15 1 220 000
2. N29 1 064 249
3. N25 983 704
4. N18 919 928
5. N207 897 621
6. N9 747 968
7. N279 735 375
8. N8 669 609
9. N98 594 887
10. N38 583 772
|
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Nov 22, 2020 10:24:50 GMT
Top Route of Single decker: 1. C10 4 887 436 2. 235 4 733 301 3. 195 4 731 490 4. 316 4 710 048 5. W15 4 700 456 6. 200 4 152 818 ( i understand this was before change to DD) 7. 276 4 149 795 8. C11 4 069 182 9. 46 4 046 858 10. 80 4 034 589 Nice to see that two out of the top 10 are expected to convert to DD (80 and 200). Bar the 195 I think all are restricted to SDs. |
|
