|
Post by BE37054 (quoll662) on Sept 2, 2021 21:01:47 GMT
Continuing on from the discussion in the Abellio thread. Thanks to WH241 for suggesting a new thread.
|
|
|
Post by lundnah on Sept 2, 2021 21:03:00 GMT
Continuing on from the discussion in the Abellio thread. Thanks to WH241 for suggesting a new thread. No.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Sept 2, 2021 21:05:16 GMT
Think it's ulikely London Buses would be privatised just as other UK cities push for London style franchises.
|
|
|
Post by LondonNorthern on Sept 2, 2021 21:09:23 GMT
No I doubt they will be.
Ups and downs to both sides.
|
|
|
Post by capitalomnibus on Sept 2, 2021 22:50:50 GMT
Continuing on from the discussion in the Abellio thread. Thanks to WH241 for suggesting a new thread. I do not understand the meaning of this thread at all. Buses in London are privitised. The last buses we had run by the government finished with the 11 subsidaries in 1994. We did have a brief reprise with East Thames Buses from around 2002 for around 7 years; since that nothing. Or do you mean should buses in London be bought back by the government. i.e Nationalised.
|
|
|
Post by Frenzie on Sept 2, 2021 23:49:36 GMT
Continuing on from the discussion in the Abellio thread. Thanks to WH241 for suggesting a new thread. I do not understand the meaning of this thread at all. Buses in London are privitised. The last buses we had run by the government finished with the 11 subsidaries in 1994. We did have a brief reprise with East Thames Buses from around 2002 for around 7 years; since that nothing. Or do you mean should buses in London be bought back by the government. i.e Nationalised. I think he means deregulated.
|
|
|
Post by M1104 on Sept 3, 2021 0:03:25 GMT
Continuing on from the discussion in the Abellio thread. Thanks to WH241 for suggesting a new thread. I do not understand the meaning of this thread at all. Buses in London are privitised. The last buses we had run by the government finished with the 11 subsidaries in 1994. We did have a brief reprise with East Thames Buses from around 2002 for around 7 years; since that nothing. Or do you mean should buses in London be bought back by the government. i.e Nationalised. I'm wondering if it's meant to imply route deregulation as like you said the buses are already privatised.
|
|
|
Post by M1104 on Sept 3, 2021 0:05:07 GMT
I do not understand the meaning of this thread at all. Buses in London are privitised. The last buses we had run by the government finished with the 11 subsidaries in 1994. We did have a brief reprise with East Thames Buses from around 2002 for around 7 years; since that nothing. Or do you mean should buses in London be bought back by the government. i.e Nationalised. I think he means deregulated. Oops! Only just realised your post
|
|
|
Post by dashing0ne on Sept 3, 2021 5:59:13 GMT
For those who are intersted and confused, I suggest reading pages 1054 to 1057 of the Abellio thread where the conversation started.
|
|
|
Post by BE37054 (quoll662) on Sept 3, 2021 7:38:53 GMT
I do not understand the meaning of this thread at all. Buses in London are privitised. The last buses we had run by the government finished with the 11 subsidaries in 1994. We did have a brief reprise with East Thames Buses from around 2002 for around 7 years; since that nothing. Or do you mean should buses in London be bought back by the government. i.e Nationalised. I think he means deregulated. I've changed it
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Sept 3, 2021 9:17:43 GMT
I think he means deregulated. I've changed it To be honest think the title is still wrong as their are plenty of different TfL bus contractual models that 'could' work that full short of deregulation. "The Future of the TfL Bus Contractual Model discussion' would be a better title in my eyes.
|
|
|
Post by capitalomnibus on Sept 3, 2021 10:21:54 GMT
I do not understand the meaning of this thread at all. Buses in London are privitised. The last buses we had run by the government finished with the 11 subsidaries in 1994. We did have a brief reprise with East Thames Buses from around 2002 for around 7 years; since that nothing. Or do you mean should buses in London be bought back by the government. i.e Nationalised. I think he means deregulated. Ok, that would make more sense. As for de-regulation in London I cannot see that working, it would be a total mess
|
|
|
Post by cl54 on Sept 4, 2021 8:06:01 GMT
I think he means deregulated. Ok, that would make more sense. As for de-regulation in London I cannot see that working, it would be a total mess Given that TfL provide financial support for many routes complete deregulation could mean the end of this. Operators will not run buses at a loss.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Sept 4, 2021 9:01:10 GMT
I think he means deregulated. Ok, that would make more sense. As for de-regulation in London I cannot see that working, it would be a total mess Just imagine the competition on busy corridors like the Romford Road! would be total madness!
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Sept 4, 2021 10:29:51 GMT
Ok, that would make more sense. As for de-regulation in London I cannot see that working, it would be a total mess Given that TfL provide financial support for many routes complete deregulation could mean the end of this. Operators will not run buses at a loss. The 19 would certainly be toast between Holborn and Battersea Bridge if deregulated.
|
|