|
|
Post by SILENCED on Sept 20, 2021 15:08:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by JUNIOR26 on Dec 13, 2021 18:54:23 GMT
A bit late to post this, but just for those that don't know.
Consultation update 1 December 2021
Between 17 September and 15 October 2021, we held a public consultation on a proposal affecting bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. You can read more about our proposals below.
We received 50 responses to the consultation. Thank you to all those who took part. Please see our consultation summary report in the ‘Documents’ section for further details, including our response to issues raised.
After careful consideration, we have decided to proceed with the proposed changes to bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. Subject to completing road works to install a new bus stop, we would like to introduce this service change in early 2022.
|
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Dec 13, 2021 20:24:49 GMT
A bit late to post this, but just for those that don't know. Consultation update 1 December 2021 Between 17 September and 15 October 2021, we held a public consultation on a proposal affecting bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. You can read more about our proposals below. We received 50 responses to the consultation. Thank you to all those who took part. Please see our consultation summary report in the ‘Documents’ section for further details, including our response to issues raised. After careful consideration, we have decided to proceed with the proposed changes to bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. Subject to completing road works to install a new bus stop, we would like to introduce this service change in early 2022. Looking at the responses, more were against the change than in support |
|
|
|
Post by richard on Dec 13, 2021 20:58:29 GMT
A bit late to post this, but just for those that don't know. Consultation update 1 December 2021 Between 17 September and 15 October 2021, we held a public consultation on a proposal affecting bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. You can read more about our proposals below. We received 50 responses to the consultation. Thank you to all those who took part. Please see our consultation summary report in the ‘Documents’ section for further details, including our response to issues raised. After careful consideration, we have decided to proceed with the proposed changes to bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. Subject to completing road works to install a new bus stop, we would like to introduce this service change in early 2022. Looking at the responses, more were against the change than in support I fear the same thing will happen with the 1,168 and 271 consolation |
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Dec 13, 2021 22:34:41 GMT
A bit late to post this, but just for those that don't know. Consultation update 1 December 2021 Between 17 September and 15 October 2021, we held a public consultation on a proposal affecting bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. You can read more about our proposals below. We received 50 responses to the consultation. Thank you to all those who took part. Please see our consultation summary report in the ‘Documents’ section for further details, including our response to issues raised. After careful consideration, we have decided to proceed with the proposed changes to bus routes 212, 357 and 657 at Hatch Lane, Chingford. Subject to completing road works to install a new bus stop, we would like to introduce this service change in early 2022. Looking at the responses, more were against the change than in support I wouldn't be surprised. I don't see how much time would be saved by removing that stop on Hatch Lane and putting a new one on the A1009 even if that stop isn't well used |
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Dec 13, 2021 23:05:17 GMT
I’m not local but how much time will this save? Not more than a few seconds I think?
|
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Dec 14, 2021 8:50:22 GMT
I’m not local but how much time will this save? Not more than a few seconds I think? A minute at best maybe and thats generous |
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Dec 14, 2021 21:46:13 GMT
Probably a silly suggestion and there's an obvious reason why they couldn't do it but couldn't let's say the 212 divert and the 357 stay the same? Would give anyone one particularly at night who really didn't want to cross the green the option to wait for a 357 or vice versa if only the 212 stayed the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Dec 14, 2021 21:58:11 GMT
Probably a silly suggestion and there's an obvious reason why they couldn't do it but couldn't let's say the 212 divert and the 357 stay the same? Would give anyone one particularly at night who really didn't want to cross the green the option to wait for a 357 or vice versa if only the 212 stayed the same. Personally, I can't believe they're wasting money on such a change at a time when finances are tight when the benefits are incredibly minimal at best. As I said before, they may as well not bother having consultations as they are merely tick box excercises rather than actually listening to people's views and enacting on the changes that people actually want. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2021 22:46:36 GMT
This is a silly consultation, saves no money at all because you end up saving 30 seconds per journey which isn't saving any time really
|
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Mar 20, 2022 15:33:58 GMT
The changes are going ahead on the 26th March according to London bus routes.
|
|
|
|
Post by mondraker275 on Mar 24, 2022 8:43:16 GMT
One of the more baffling consultations and changes. There must be another factor like safety or residents complaining or council worker. WHy would TfL been alerted to this unless they did an incredibly detailed review of the area? Maybe there is a regular TfL/WF person who takes the 357 and has slowly campaigned for it not to serve Walthamstow Central, got rid of the roundabout at Whipps Cross and now this... Dont be surprised to see the X357 soon.  |
|
|
|
Post by uakari on Mar 24, 2022 15:25:46 GMT
One of the more baffling consultations and changes. There must be another factor like safety or residents complaining or council worker. WHy would TfL been alerted to this unless they did an incredibly detailed review of the area? Maybe there is a regular TfL/WF person who takes the 357 and has slowly campaigned for it not to serve Walthamstow Central, got rid of the roundabout at Whipps Cross and now this... Dont be surprised to see the X357 soon. The more I deal with them the more I think that TfL are influenced by certain people on their staff living in certain areas/taking certain routes and by lobbying from special interest groups. I imagine a lot of these decisions are made under the table. In the meeting about the 384 removal they made a big thing about how some of the people making the decisions lived in the BOROUGH of Barnet (not actually in Barnet) and then proceeded to discuss all the wonderful extensions they were making in Finchley such as the 125 and 112. So I wouldn't be surprised if this was also one of their staff's pet-routes/areas. |
|
