|
Post by rj131 on Jan 25, 2019 22:30:04 GMT
I guess that it might be covering for 12274, 12280, 12288 & 11059 as all of those buses are missing for the past one month already. I wonder if any have gone away for refurbishment for the 96s new contract. It just felt like those buses entered service yesterday! If they are away for refurbishment, surely these are the newest buses ever to be refurbished
|
|
|
Post by redexpress on Jan 25, 2019 22:41:29 GMT
I wonder if any have gone away for refurbishment for the 96s new contract. It just felt like those buses entered service yesterday! If they are away for refurbishment, surely these are the newest buses ever to be refurbished Tower Transit's 62-reg VNs were refurbished when they were less than 5 years old. If it hadn't been for the change of moquette colour (First to TT) I'm not sure anyone would have noticed
|
|
|
Post by rj131 on Jan 25, 2019 23:21:41 GMT
If they are away for refurbishment, surely these are the newest buses ever to be refurbished Tower Transit's 62-reg VNs were refurbished when they were less than 5 years old. If it hadn't been for the change of moquette colour (First to TT) I'm not sure anyone would have noticed Yes I was really surprised when I heard about those getting refurbished so early in their London lives *if* the 415 MMCs go to the 207 I wonder if they’ll get a refurb. To be fair due to the generally relaxed, quiet nature of the 415 they look like new anyway. It’s just a shame they rattle so bl*ody much if not a refurb the panels on them need tightening up, the 15-reg U5 buses are the same. I’ve been on nine of the marginally older 109 MMCs which yes are more worn due to incredibly intense usage, but none of those hardly rattle due to the excellent care they’ve had from BC.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jan 25, 2019 23:35:00 GMT
Tower Transit's 62-reg VNs were refurbished when they were less than 5 years old. If it hadn't been for the change of moquette colour (First to TT) I'm not sure anyone would have noticed Yes I was really surprised when I heard about those getting refurbished so early in their London lives *if* the 415 MMCs go to the 207 I wonder if they’ll get a refurb. To be fair due to the generally relaxed, quiet nature of the 415 they look like new anyway. It’s just a shame they rattle so bl*ody much if not a refurb the panels on them need tightening up, the 15-reg U5 buses are the same. I’ve been on nine of the marginally older 109 MMCs which yes are more worn due to incredibly intense usage, but none of those hardly rattle due to the excellent care they’ve had from BC. The 415's rattle roughly the same as the 109's batch - the difference between them is, as you say, the 109's batch are more worn out. Going back to your original point, the Stagecoach Enviro 400H's from the 54 & 75 transferring to PD are 14 reg so are 5 years old this year which is usually the earliest buses are refurbished bar exceptions like the 62 reg VN's & the ex 15 Enviro 400H's when moved to the 56.
|
|
|
Post by Max B on Jan 28, 2019 8:04:26 GMT
WVL467 NP > BX.
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Jan 28, 2019 11:20:27 GMT
ADH45010 S > V ADH45014 S > V ADH45030 V > S ADH45037 V > S
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2019 14:02:53 GMT
ADH45010 S > V ADH45014 S > V ADH45030 V > S ADH45037 V > S What is the point in this movement?
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jan 28, 2019 14:18:45 GMT
ADH45010 S > V ADH45014 S > V ADH45030 V > S ADH45037 V > S What is the point in this movement? The theory that others have come up with is that the E3 is taking the 60 reg batch from the 94 and leaving the 62 reg to perform a different role, likely at a different garage.
|
|
|
Post by Max B on Jan 29, 2019 9:03:46 GMT
9421 AB > QB. SE87 Q > MG.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2019 14:53:03 GMT
VMH2539, 2450, 2541 WJs -> PB
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2019 16:59:47 GMT
DE20074 RP > SO
EDITED: V > SO
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2019 17:16:33 GMT
My mistake, still think the 272 is at RP..
|
|
|
Post by Max B on Jan 31, 2019 15:23:40 GMT
E51 BX > NP.
|
|
|
Post by Max B on Feb 2, 2019 11:18:39 GMT
DW332 DX > GY.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2019 11:42:16 GMT
Possible loan, but wow very rare, do not see why they would need a loan though, hmm.
|
|