|
Post by BCE47001 on Feb 26, 2020 21:37:54 GMT
Likely a driver from AR covering a driver from EC on the 158, t came off the 41 at 8 PM and went on the 158 at 9 PM. Happens quite a lot. I have a feeling it's just a loan for a VLW and DW that's currently VOR They've both been VOR for about a month now and EC are doing okay, the 158 has an extra spare and AR to my knowledge do not have 158 on their blindsets, the last HV working from AR did not have blinds and theres no way they had time to go from the 41 at 8PM back to the garage then to Edmonton, change the blindset then head to the 158. Likely just a driver covering a duty, it normally is the 259 getting cover from AR.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Feb 26, 2020 21:40:37 GMT
I have a feeling it's just a loan for a VLW and DW that's currently VOR They've both been VOR for about a month now and EC are doing okay, the 158 has an extra spare and AR to my knowledge do not have 158 on their blindsets, the last HV working from AR did not have blinds and theres no way they had time to go from the 41 at 8PM back to the garage then to Edmonton, change the blindset then head to the 158. Likely just a driver covering a duty, it normally is the 259 getting cover from AR. I maybe wrong but isn't that one of the batch in the 400 series that was on the 123 before the route moved back to AR?
|
|
|
Post by BCE47001 on Feb 26, 2020 21:42:45 GMT
They've both been VOR for about a month now and EC are doing okay, the 158 has an extra spare and AR to my knowledge do not have 158 on their blindsets, the last HV working from AR did not have blinds and theres no way they had time to go from the 41 at 8PM back to the garage then to Edmonton, change the blindset then head to the 158. Likely just a driver covering a duty, it normally is the 259 getting cover from AR. I maybe wrong but isn't that one of the batch in the 400 series that was on the 123 before the route moved back to AR? No, this particular example is from WN. Moved to AR, February last year.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Feb 26, 2020 21:46:06 GMT
I maybe wrong but isn't that one of the batch in the 400 series that was on the 123 before the route moved back to AR? No, this particular example is from WN. Moved to AR, February last year. Thought so since the 123 has been back at AR it's been very confusing to what was at EC for the 123 before it came back to AR lol
|
|
|
Post by busoccultation on Feb 26, 2020 21:57:18 GMT
No, this particular example is from WN. Moved to AR, February last year. Thought so since the 123 has been back at AR it's been very confusing to what was at EC for the 123 before it came back to AR lol Its isn't too difficult to remember which buses was parked at EC for the 123 which it mainly used DW467/68, DW490-500 & VLW901-10 plus sometimes HV201-225 from the 259. DW467/68 are the only two buses with carried on being used on the 123 (along with the 41 & 230) at AR and DW490-500 & VLW901-10 are the ones kept at EC for the 158.
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Feb 27, 2020 16:47:44 GMT
SEN29 MG > MB, currently on route 352 Finally it returns! Probably a refurb float for the 352
|
|
|
Post by bustavane on Feb 27, 2020 18:00:54 GMT
SEN29 MG > MB, currently on route 352 Finally it returns! Probably a refurb float for the 352 Wasn't this replaced at MG by the sole SE from the 100 (SE221) that didn't go to Plymouth? Perhaps it's permanently back (a replacement for 170's replacement, SEN37?).
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Feb 27, 2020 18:03:38 GMT
SEN29 MG > MB, currently on route 352 Finally it returns! Probably a refurb float for the 352 Wasn't this replaced at MG by the sole SE from the 100 (SE221) that didn't go to Plymouth? Perhaps it's permanently back (a replacement for 170's replacement, SEN37?). That seems likely, but what's SEN37 got to do with this? That's an AL vehicle. I think you may be right in saying it's back for good now.
|
|
|
Post by bustavane on Feb 27, 2020 18:24:31 GMT
Wasn't this replaced at MG by the sole SE from the 100 (SE221) that didn't go to Plymouth? Perhaps it's permanently back (a replacement for 170's replacement, SEN37?). That seems likely, but what's SEN37 got to do with this? That's an AL vehicle. I think you may be right in saying it's back for good now. Sorry, typo: I meant the unloved SEN38
|
|
|
Post by richard on Feb 28, 2020 22:02:03 GMT
LT230 SF>CT LT188 CT>SF
|
|
|
Post by Max B on Feb 29, 2020 0:54:08 GMT
And it looks like LT580 has moved to SF from AR.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Feb 29, 2020 2:34:27 GMT
And it looks like LT580 has moved to SF from AR. Looks like the conversion of the 19 underway things must have changed because up until recently London bus routes said the 19 would be using LTs from the 38 . And now says "existing hybrid New Bus for London double deckers from Northumberland Park garage." Before that is was supposed to be using the 67s when that goose to Go-Ahead.
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Feb 29, 2020 8:41:51 GMT
And it looks like LT580 has moved to SF from AR. Looks like the conversion of the 19 underway things must have changed because up until recently London bus routes said the 19 would be using LTs from the 38 . And now says "existing hybrid New Bus for London double deckers from Northumberland Park garage." Before that is was supposed to be using the 67s when that goose to Go-Ahead. Does LBR say that? ... Just refreshed page and it says .... "Fully converted to New Bus for London double deckers (from route 67). (011019)" It and indicates it was last ammended 1 October
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Feb 29, 2020 13:01:00 GMT
WHV42 NX > MG I do hope this comes back to C eventually
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Mar 1, 2020 10:22:57 GMT
They’re off again!! My thoughts exactly, what route were those three VH's purchased for? I am a year late but they were ordered for the 635.
|
|