Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2020 19:18:05 GMT
Yep, was reported back in March by me I think after reading in March TLB. Looking on LVF LT 172/3/231-6 are not in use so guess in the process of transferring.
Do we know which other LT's GAL plan to use to make up the shortfall?
Perhaps they could use a few of the 76s LTs? If they've been reblinded to include the 67 I mean once full services are in place the 67 will need a few extra LTs as not enough are transferring from Arriva.
I believe the 76 batch have updated blinds with the 67 on them.
|
|
|
Post by orangejamieboss on May 25, 2020 19:19:59 GMT
I think orangejamieboss might be referring to the 100/200 series LT's that was new to the 38 which is now relocated to the 67. Yeah no vehicles are coming directly from the 38. LT172/173/232-236 are the vehicles transferring. I think you may have missed LT188 The batch being allocated seems really random and messy, it would be a lot nicer if they were given a more linear batch instead.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on May 25, 2020 20:50:29 GMT
Yeah no vehicles are coming directly from the 38. LT172/173/232-236 are the vehicles transferring. I think you may have missed LT188 The batch being allocated seems really random and messy, it would be a lot nicer if they were given a more linear batch instead. LT188 should be included as well - as for what's allocated, it's not based on making it look linear all the time. LT172-173 & 188 for example had been freed up from the 59's PVR cut and so makes more sense to move these particular examples rather than take ones already at CT on the 38 as your then minimizing blind costs for example.
|
|
|
Post by MoEnviro on May 26, 2020 7:38:40 GMT
I think you may have missed LT188 The batch being allocated seems really random and messy, it would be a lot nicer if they were given a more linear batch instead. LT188 should be included as well - as for what's allocated, it's not based on making it look linear all the time. LT172-173 & 188 for example had been freed up from the 59's PVR cut and so makes more sense to move these particular examples rather than take ones already at CT on the 38 as your then minimizing blind costs for example. I still stand by 188 not being included, 13 vehicles are needed for the new contract, Arriva are transferring the 8 previously mentioned and GAL are providing 5 others.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on May 26, 2020 9:56:36 GMT
LT188 should be included as well - as for what's allocated, it's not based on making it look linear all the time. LT172-173 & 188 for example had been freed up from the 59's PVR cut and so makes more sense to move these particular examples rather than take ones already at CT on the 38 as your then minimizing blind costs for example. I still stand by 188 not being included, 13 vehicles are needed for the new contract, Arriva are transferring the 8 previously mentioned and GAL are providing 5 others. Fair enough - what will be happening to LT188 after the 67 goes?
|
|
|
Post by MoEnviro on May 26, 2020 10:10:31 GMT
I still stand by 188 not being included, 13 vehicles are needed for the new contract, Arriva are transferring the 8 previously mentioned and GAL are providing 5 others. Fair enough - what will be happening to LT188 after the 67 goes? How many more LT’s does the 19 need to get a full allocation?
|
|
|
Post by busoccultation on May 26, 2020 10:18:07 GMT
Fair enough - what will be happening to LT188 after the 67 goes? How many more LT’s does the 19 need to get a full allocation? So far the 19 has got 22 LT's (LT317-326 & LT464-475) and needs another 7 more to make the 19 for a full LT allocation.
|
|
|
Post by MoEnviro on May 26, 2020 10:23:09 GMT
How many more LT’s does the 19 need to get a full allocation? So far the 19 has got 22 LT's (LT317-326 & LT464-475) and needs another 7 more to make the 19 for a full LT allocation. Thanks and it’s only 5 that come free from the 67 if 8 are transferring to GAL?
|
|
|
Post by busoccultation on May 26, 2020 12:43:16 GMT
So far the 19 has got 22 LT's (LT317-326 & LT464-475) and needs another 7 more to make the 19 for a full LT allocation. Thanks and it’s only 5 that come free from the 67 if 8 are transferring to GAL? Looking at the 400/500/800 series LT's at SF all of which are staying with Arriva, there are 71 of them in that range with only 64 LT's needed for the 73/253 with 38 of them for the 73 (PVR of 34 + 4 spares) and 26 of them for the 253 (PVR of 23 + 3 spares), which leaves 7 LT's that can transfer to AR for the 19.
|
|
|
Post by richard on May 26, 2020 12:51:47 GMT
VWH2017 HT>W
|
|
|
Post by george on May 26, 2020 13:01:06 GMT
Mentioned by foxhat the other day
|
|
|
Post by richard on May 26, 2020 13:03:54 GMT
Mentioned by foxhat the other day Yeah I know no harm in mentioning something again.
|
|
|
Post by george on May 26, 2020 13:08:19 GMT
Mentioned by foxhat the other day Yeah I know no harm in mentioning something again. I disagree if you already know something has been posted don't see the point of mentioning it again. If you don't know then that's different.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2020 13:32:06 GMT
Yeah I know no harm in mentioning something again. I disagree if you already know something has been posted don't see the point of mentioning it again. If you don't know then that's different. And I disagree with you I see no harm in information being repeated sometimes people don't have time to check back several pages or might read the forum by latest posts.
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on May 26, 2020 13:42:44 GMT
Yeah I know no harm in mentioning something again. I disagree if you already know something has been posted don't see the point of mentioning it again. If you don't know then that's different. I personally don't see the point in your original post ... but presumably you do ... what is important to one person, may not be important to another and vice-versa.
|
|