|
Post by SouthLondoner468 on Feb 11, 2024 19:25:16 GMT
EH227 has “We are part of the Go Ahead group” on the front, rather than the Go Ahead logo Is that bus at Q? I noticed a similar logo on the back of a 42 yesterday. If not, maybe it is about to become more widespread. Its a PM bus— I saw it on the 197. The “We are part of the Go Ahead group” logo is standard at the rear of Go Ahead buses— I’ve never seen a bus with it on the front.
|
|
|
Post by londonbuses on Feb 12, 2024 12:35:16 GMT
Are MHV11-20 and 53-62 all planned to move to NP?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2024 13:08:54 GMT
Are MHV11-20 and 53-62 all planned to move to NP? I think 20 is slightly generous but I imagine it will be 18 or 19 as the 91 has to have another hybrid allocated to it(PVR 15, TVR 17, only 16 EHVs).
|
|
|
Post by elcesteem16 on Feb 12, 2024 14:37:20 GMT
Yes and there isn't really anywhere in Catford town centre either for it to stand. I think it's close to 10 to 12 mins down there and back up to TL in order to turn around. There is one place it could go especially now it no longer goes to Holborn ita highly uikley but Beckenham? Via Lower Sydenham could work maybe 🤔 One for the fantasy thread me thinks.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Feb 12, 2024 14:59:23 GMT
Are MHV11-20 and 53-62 all planned to move to NP? I think 20 is slightly generous but I imagine it will be 18 or 19 as the 91 has to have another hybrid allocated to it(PVR 15, TVR 17, only 16 EHVs). Depends on how many spares in total at NP, whilst 2 spares is usual for a 15 PVR route, one spare may be sufficient for the 91 if the total percentage of spares at NP is already sufficient
|
|
|
Post by LVF_Admin on Feb 12, 2024 15:54:46 GMT
Are MHV11-20 and 53-62 all planned to move to NP? I think 20 is slightly generous but I imagine it will be 18 or 19 as the 91 has to have another hybrid allocated to it(PVR 15, TVR 17, only 16 EHVs). Isnt that MHV54 which was swopped with WHV50 at NX so the MHV could go to NP
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2024 16:15:08 GMT
I think 20 is slightly generous but I imagine it will be 18 or 19 as the 91 has to have another hybrid allocated to it(PVR 15, TVR 17, only 16 EHVs). Isnt that MHV54 which was swopped with WHV50 at NX so the MHV could go to NP That's what it seems like, it transferred to NP along with the EHVs after replacing WHV50
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Feb 12, 2024 17:08:31 GMT
I think 20 is slightly generous but I imagine it will be 18 or 19 as the 91 has to have another hybrid allocated to it(PVR 15, TVR 17, only 16 EHVs). Isnt that MHV54 which was swopped with WHV50 at NX so the MHV could go to NP Did wonder why WHV50 had left SW in the first place!
|
|
|
Post by londonbuses on Feb 12, 2024 18:07:21 GMT
I think 20 is slightly generous but I imagine it will be 18 or 19 as the 91 has to have another hybrid allocated to it(PVR 15, TVR 17, only 16 EHVs). Depends on how many spares in total at NP, whilst 2 spares is usual for a 15 PVR route, one spare may be sufficient for the 91 if the total percentage of spares at NP is already sufficient One EHV is currently VOR so at least one MHV is required at the bare minimum.
|
|
|
Post by adl on Feb 13, 2024 11:18:06 GMT
I’m hearing EH88/89 are to make the move from RR > Q to release further MHVs to NP.
Wonder if a few 17 reg will also make the move making the 1 EH/WHV operated releasing MHVs to other homes. I’m guessing a few more MHVs may make the move to NP to cover the 91s pending extension and may as well send 1 MHV for the 657 if they have spares about rather then keeping just 1 WVL for the 657.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Feb 13, 2024 11:31:27 GMT
I’m hearing EH88/89 are to make the move from RR > Q to release further MHVs to NP. Wonder if a few 17 reg will also make the move making the 1 EH/WHV operated releasing MHVs to other homes. I’m guessing a few more MHVs may make the move to NP to cover the 91s pending extension and may as well send 1 MHV for the 657 if they have spares about rather then keeping just 1 WVL for the 657. I know it won’t happen but would have liked the 147 to have had a full MHV allocation. I do like the style of these buses and they are not as ugly as the the G3 WVLs.
|
|
|
Post by londonbuses on Feb 13, 2024 11:34:01 GMT
I’m hearing EH88/89 are to make the move from RR > Q to release further MHVs to NP. Wonder if a few 17 reg will also make the move making the 1 EH/WHV operated releasing MHVs to other homes. I’m guessing a few more MHVs may make the move to NP to cover the 91s pending extension and may as well send 1 MHV for the 657 if they have spares about rather then keeping just 1 WVL for the 657. If the MHVs do all move to NP, I wonder if the WVNs will be sent down to AL to be temporarily used on the 200. I would assume most of the SEs being used on the 200 will be needed as a temporary allocation for the 325 when it moves to Go-Ahead in a few weeks time, so something else will probably be needed for the 200 very soon.
|
|
|
Post by M1104 on Feb 13, 2024 11:46:12 GMT
I’m hearing EH88/89 are to make the move from RR > Q to release further MHVs to NP. Wonder if a few 17 reg will also make the move making the 1 EH/WHV operated releasing MHVs to other homes. I’m guessing a few more MHVs may make the move to NP to cover the 91s pending extension and may as well send 1 MHV for the 657 if they have spares about rather then keeping just 1 WVL for the 657. If the MHVs do all move to NP, I wonder if the WVNs will be sent down to AL to be temporarily used on the 200. I would assume most of the SEs being used on the 200 will be needed as a temporary allocation for the 325 when it moves to Go-Ahead in a few weeks time, so something else will probably be needed for the 200 very soon. I believe one of the Mes was recently seen outside AL a few days ago, the batch perhaps imminently returning to the 200
|
|
|
Post by southlondon413 on Feb 13, 2024 11:47:01 GMT
I’m hearing EH88/89 are to make the move from RR > Q to release further MHVs to NP. Wonder if a few 17 reg will also make the move making the 1 EH/WHV operated releasing MHVs to other homes. I’m guessing a few more MHVs may make the move to NP to cover the 91s pending extension and may as well send 1 MHV for the 657 if they have spares about rather then keeping just 1 WVL for the 657. If the MHVs do all move to NP, I wonder if the WVNs will be sent down to AL to be temporarily used on the 200. I would assume most of the SEs being used on the 200 will be needed as a temporary allocation for the 325 when it moves to Go-Ahead in a few weeks time, so something else will probably be needed for the 200 very soon. There are still the 65-reg SE available.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Feb 13, 2024 13:04:15 GMT
If the MHVs do all move to NP, I wonder if the WVNs will be sent down to AL to be temporarily used on the 200. I would assume most of the SEs being used on the 200 will be needed as a temporary allocation for the 325 when it moves to Go-Ahead in a few weeks time, so something else will probably be needed for the 200 very soon. There are still the 65-reg SE available. I’m particularly hoping these start off the 325 personally
|
|