|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 12, 2020 8:49:35 GMT
The K1's MMCs are now listed on LVF: SDE20303 YX20OLA SDE20304 YX20OLB SDE20305 YX20OLC SDE20306 YX20OLE SDE20307 YX20OLG SDE20308 YX20OLH SDE20309 YX20OLJ SDE20310 YX20OLK SDE20311 YX20OLM SDE20312 YX20OLN SDE20313 YX20OLO SDE20314 YX20OLP SDE20315 YX20OLR Very smiliar to the H37 DXEs regs.
|
|
|
Post by Volvo on Aug 12, 2020 10:38:44 GMT
The K1's MMCs are now listed on LVF: SDE20303 YX20OLA SDE20304 YX20OLB SDE20305 YX20OLC SDE20306 YX20OLE SDE20307 YX20OLG SDE20308 YX20OLH SDE20309 YX20OLJ SDE20310 YX20OLK SDE20311 YX20OLM SDE20312 YX20OLN SDE20313 YX20OLO SDE20314 YX20OLP SDE20315 YX20OLR Very smiliar to the H37 DXEs regs. I notice this alot on ADL buses.
|
|
|
Post by LJ17THF on Aug 12, 2020 11:20:54 GMT
Very similar to the H37 DXEs regs. I notice this alot on ADL buses. Possibly because of the operator and the manufacturer being the same.
|
|
|
Post by Volvo on Aug 12, 2020 12:38:10 GMT
I notice this alot on ADL buses. Possibly because of the operator and the manufacturer being the same. No, just ADL recycle regs alot. It's not anything to do with the operator as two different operators can have a similar reg with ADL buses. E.g E400 MMC Hybrid Go ahead YX19JWA E400 MMC Hybrid Abellio YX18JWA.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2020 12:39:27 GMT
Anyone know or remind me, the status of LT123 and LT128?
|
|
|
Post by askaway on Aug 12, 2020 17:21:23 GMT
what buses will be used for the 28? any chance of ade's? not sure if ratp have enviro400 (excluding e40d's)
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 12, 2020 17:37:47 GMT
what buses will be used for the 28? any chance of ade's? not sure if ratp have enviro400 (excluding e40d's) B5LH Gemini 2s found on the 139 currently
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Aug 12, 2020 21:35:14 GMT
what buses will be used for the 28? any chance of ade's? not sure if ratp have enviro400 (excluding e40d's) RATP didn’t inherit any diesel Enviro 400’s of the non E40D kind as Transdev preference was Scanias. The ADE’s won’t be used for a new contract as they are already tied down to their respective routes.
|
|
|
Post by LT 20181 on Aug 13, 2020 14:23:59 GMT
DEs 20192, 20193 & 20194 have now gone to BT from SO
|
|
|
Post by Volvo on Aug 13, 2020 16:02:54 GMT
Finally some more, I saw 195 the other week on 326 and totally forgot to mention it.
SP40074 should have been returned to SO today. Apparently we are currently 7 DDs short.
|
|
connor
Driver
Enter your message here...
Posts: 160
|
Post by connor on Aug 13, 2020 17:56:27 GMT
DEs 20192, 20193 & 20194 have now gone to BT from SO can you also confirm that 20195-8 have also gone to BT please.
|
|
|
Post by LT 20181 on Aug 13, 2020 18:06:15 GMT
DEs 20192, 20193 & 20194 have now gone to BT from SO can you also confirm that 20195-8 have also gone to BT please. Yes. They’re there as well, although they moved to BT from SO a number of weeks ago so they’ve been there for some time now. DE20199 I imagine is meant to be there too but has been MIA for some time now.
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 13, 2020 18:10:18 GMT
How many extra buses will RATP need for school routes once schools return?
|
|
|
Post by ADH45258 on Aug 14, 2020 0:33:20 GMT
With speculation on WD potentially returning to TFL work, following the 28/639/670 gain, I think this could be quite strategic. The Original Tour fleet could perhaps be moved to either NC or HH to facilitate this, where there is less opportunity to expand TFL routes.
As has been mentioned by others, RATP in Wandsworth could increase competition in the area, where Go Ahead operate a lot of routes, particularly out of AF & PL. While not too far from the existing RATP network, this would open further possibilities for routes to bid for. Looking just at the upcoming tenders, routes such as the 156 and 344 could then be gained by RATP.
There's also a number of existing RATP routes that could also run from Wandsworth. The 85 is a good example, with WD being much closer to Putney than TV is to Kingston. The 220 terminates in Wandsworth, while the 211, 265 and 419 are also not far away.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2020 2:24:52 GMT
With speculation on WD potentially returning to TFL work, following the 28/639/670 gain, I think this could be quite strategic. The Original Tour fleet could perhaps be moved to either NC or HH to facilitate this, where there is less opportunity to expand TFL routes. As has been mentioned by others, RATP in Wandsworth could increase competition in the area, where Go Ahead operate a lot of routes, particularly out of AF & PL. While not too far from the existing RATP network, this would open further possibilities for routes to bid for. Looking just at the upcoming tenders, routes such as the 156 and 344 could then be gained by RATP. There's also a number of existing RATP routes that could also run from Wandsworth. The 85 is a good example, with WD being much closer to Putney than TV is to Kingston. The 220 terminates in Wandsworth, while the 211, 265 and 419 are also not far away. This is sort out of the box but WD could win the 295 making it also a competition with ML!
|
|