Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2005 13:28:58 GMT
How many new buses entered London Transport stock in 1955 ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2005 23:28:48 GMT
LT in 1955 says NONE.
As an aside, the Victoria Line was announced by LT in 1955, but was the name of its proposed northern terminus at that time?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2005 9:30:02 GMT
Sorry, incorrect. Clue: do you have a 2005 Cobham running day programme to hand?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2005 16:35:46 GMT
one
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2005 8:47:03 GMT
and it was ?
|
|
|
Post by john on Apr 12, 2005 16:53:40 GMT
SLT56 ......RM1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2005 19:26:39 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2005 21:50:11 GMT
Sorry, incorrect. Clue: do you have a 2005 Cobham running day programme to hand? OK I see entered stock, well yes RM 2 entered stock, but the LT in 1955 report shows that no buses were purchased as RM 2 was built in-house by LT. In 1956 there were no buses bought or built. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2005 9:16:03 GMT
Your comment about the Victoria line not fully understood. Are you saying what was the proposed northern terminus of the line?
I dare say the alignment was flexible those days.
As a further aside, the wall-mounted enamel line maps (for want of a better name) at Victoria and possibly elsewhere are much deeper than necessary which suggests that they were planning to go further south than Brixton.
|
|