|
Post by rift on Nov 27, 2023 12:58:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Nov 27, 2023 13:01:11 GMT
That explains the lack of PVR for its retain
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Nov 27, 2023 13:11:30 GMT
Not a bad proposal but if the roads could take DDs then I'd have been more in favour of the 476 diverting to there. Would be a cost neutral way of doing it and the 394 could remain every 12 mins. The 73 would maintain the link along Pentonville Road along with capacity on the 30/205/214.
Thats not to say that in time (ie after a mayoral election) the Angel stand could be user by the 476 to offset and increase in the Meridian Water area.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Nov 27, 2023 14:22:42 GMT
This is a baffling proposal - on the one hand, the extension looks like a good idea including a proposed increased Sunday service but then it's accompanied by a proposed frequency decrease to every 15 minutes during the rest of the week - hardly going to attract people to either start using it or even carry on using it
|
|
|
Post by enviroPB on Nov 27, 2023 15:01:05 GMT
Not a bad proposal but if the roads could take DDs then I'd have been more in favour of the 476 diverting to there. Would be a cost neutral way of doing it and the 394 could remain every 12 mins. The 73 would maintain the link along Pentonville Road along with capacity on the 30/205/214. Thats not to say that in time (ie after a mayoral election) the Angel stand could be user by the 476 to offset and increase in the Meridian Water area. If the 476 were to be cut to Angel, it wouldn't be able to use the 394's stand as the left turn from Liverpool Road onto Upper Street is banned.
|
|
|
Post by sdaniel on Jan 7, 2024 21:04:13 GMT
This is a very good proposal. TFL should consider putting more routes at Canal Reach in the future. But when is it likely to come into effect?
|
|