|
|
Post by ronnie on Mar 12, 2020 0:44:08 GMT
D6 passes both ends of D7
N25 passes both ends of 8
N15 passes both ends of 15 and 5 (well one end common at Romford market)
86 passes both ends of 296 (one end common)
47 passes both ends of 199
188 passes both ends of 129
Think there are a fairly large number of examples where a bus passes one terminus and the other end is common
|
|
|
|
Post by driver027 on Mar 12, 2020 4:02:25 GMT
43 passes 271 at both ends.
Honestly don’t see how the 271 has survived the cuts tbh. Seems such a pointless route with the 43 and 214 running most of its route. Crazy to think it’s a 24hr route too!! I guess Tfl know something we don’t.
|
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Mar 12, 2020 5:08:20 GMT
43 passes 271 at both ends. Honestly don’t see how the 271 has survived the cuts tbh. Seems such a pointless route with the 43 and 214 running most of its route. Crazy to think it’s a 24hr route too!! I guess Tfl know something we don’t. Actually 271 runs a bit further than Archway to Highgate so technically the 43 doesn’t run past the other end |
|
|
|
Post by kmkcheng on Mar 12, 2020 6:38:15 GMT
I got one 107 and 292 From Edgware pass at Borehamwood what do you think about this one This one doesn’t work as neither route passes both termini of the other |
|
|
|
Post by kmkcheng on Mar 12, 2020 6:48:04 GMT
H18/19- passed by every route that serves Harrow Bus station
H9/10 - At Northwick Park Hospital passed by 182, 186, 223 and H14
182 passes both termini of 186
245 passes both termini of 83
607 passes both termini of 207 and 427
79 and 204 passes both termini of 303
186 passes both termini of 340
210 passes both termini of 143 and C11
|
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Mar 12, 2020 6:55:51 GMT
Both the 207 and 607 passes both temini of the 95
Both the 427 and 607 passes both temini of the U7
|
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Mar 12, 2020 7:13:45 GMT
The 186 passes both termini of route 340.
|
|
|
|
Post by wirewiper on Mar 12, 2020 8:36:56 GMT
43 passes 271 at both ends. Honestly don’t see how the 271 has survived the cuts tbh. Seems such a pointless route with the 43 and 214 running most of its route. Crazy to think it’s a 24hr route too!! I guess Tfl know something we don’t. The 271 is a useful direct link, and has a freehold section through Canonbury between Highbury Corner and Baring Street. If its capacity was removed parallel routes would struggle to cope. |
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Mar 12, 2020 8:50:02 GMT
43 passes 271 at both ends. Honestly don’t see how the 271 has survived the cuts tbh. Seems such a pointless route with the 43 and 214 running most of its route. Crazy to think it’s a 24hr route too!! I guess Tfl know something we don’t. The 271 is a useful direct link, and has a freehold section through Canonbury between Highbury Corner and Baring Street. If its capacity was removed parallel routes would struggle to cope. I could quite conceivably see the 271 being extended to Brent Cross (or Golders Green and the 268 extended to Brent Cross) and the 210 axed with the 143 extended to Finsbury Park. It would also remove the allegedly problematical 271 stand in Highgate Village. |
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Mar 12, 2020 9:13:28 GMT
43 passes 271 at both ends. Honestly don’t see how the 271 has survived the cuts tbh. Seems such a pointless route with the 43 and 214 running most of its route. Crazy to think it’s a 24hr route too!! I guess Tfl know something we don’t. There was a suggestion that there might be a N210 introduced to Moorgate which suggested part of the (N)271 would be partly replaced. The day 271 does have a purpose thou as the section between Highbury and Old Street has roads to itself and does take a quicker route then the 43 between Higbury and Moorgate. |
|
|
|
Post by TP1 on Mar 12, 2020 10:15:09 GMT
N20 passes the 134 at both North Finchley and Warren Street
|
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Mar 12, 2020 11:11:49 GMT
The only other option would be to extend the 263 to Moorgate from High/Isl stn to replace the 271 and leave the Highgate Village section to the 143 and 210 which would remove the problematic stand. Thou it doesn't seem to be considered too problematic now tfl dont want to spend money on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by driver027 on Mar 12, 2020 11:17:41 GMT
It only really has roads to itself between baring street and just before Highbury corner. A grand Total of 4 or 5 stops. It’s also it’s quietest section of route.
|
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Mar 12, 2020 12:45:16 GMT
The 271 is a useful direct link, and has a freehold section through Canonbury between Highbury Corner and Baring Street. If its capacity was removed parallel routes would struggle to cope. I could quite conceivably see the 271 being extended to Brent Cross (or Golders Green and the 268 extended to Brent Cross) and the 210 axed with the 143 extended to Finsbury Park. It would also remove the allegedly problematical 271 stand in Highgate Village. That's a lot of changes just to remove a route from a stand - the easy solution is to simply extend the 271 to Highgate Wood to stand with the 234 rather than making wholesale changes that break links. |
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Mar 12, 2020 12:47:01 GMT
The only other option would be to extend the 263 to Moorgate from High/Isl stn to replace the 271 and leave the Highgate Village section to the 143 and 210 which would remove the problematic stand. Thou it doesn't seem to be considered too problematic now tfl dont want to spend money on it. You could simply extend the 271 to Highgate Wood instead of removing any route - the 263 is already quite a long route without extending it even further. |
|
