|
Post by busoccultation on Jan 27, 2022 15:31:58 GMT
LT581 AR > EC - This should be the final LT transfer to EC for the 259/N279 as things stand with 19 LT's now at EC for the 259's new PVR of 16 after the frequency reduction took place last weekend.
|
|
|
Post by YX10FFN on Jan 28, 2022 15:11:53 GMT
SP40098 SO > FW
|
|
|
Post by YX10FFN on Jan 28, 2022 17:11:50 GMT
SP40095 SO > FW
|
|
|
Post by YX10FFN on Jan 29, 2022 18:31:10 GMT
VWH2236 PB > W
|
|
|
Post by LondonExplorer316 on Jan 30, 2022 17:56:21 GMT
DE20177 S > V DE20178 S > TV 177 is back at S, it only worked the 272 for a few hours. Unsurprising given these moves had whittled down the number of DEs at S to 10 when the 72 TVR is 11. I'm sure 72 could cope with DLEs from 283/272 or DMEs from 440?
|
|
|
Post by YX10FFN on Jan 30, 2022 18:25:41 GMT
177 is back at S, it only worked the 272 for a few hours. Unsurprising given these moves had whittled down the number of DEs at S to 10 when the 72 TVR is 11. I'm sure 72 could cope with DLEs from 283/272 or DMEs from 440? What do you mean "cope"? Those MMCs have other assignments, the 72 has its own buses.
|
|
|
Post by LondonExplorer316 on Jan 30, 2022 18:29:07 GMT
I'm sure 72 could cope with DLEs from 283/272 or DMEs from 440? What do you mean "cope"? Those MMCs have other assignments, the 72 has its own buses. Actually, I'd say that 72/272/283 having a split allocation would make more sense than the mess that is going on now.
|
|
|
Post by YX10FFN on Jan 30, 2022 18:34:10 GMT
What do you mean "cope"? Those MMCs have other assignments, the 72 has its own buses. Actually, I'd say that 72/272/283 having a split allocation would make more sense than the mess that is going on now. How is it a mess? The 72 is based at a different garage therefore you wouldn't expect it to have a split/combined allocation.
|
|
|
Post by LondonExplorer316 on Jan 30, 2022 18:54:26 GMT
How is it a mess? The 72 is based at a different garage therefore you wouldn't expect it to have a split/combined allocation. The whole mess involving DEs leaving S and also, 72 would make sense at V if it were to happen. Also, 272 always uses 72's DEs, actually using DE52 now
|
|
|
Post by YX10FFN on Jan 30, 2022 19:09:26 GMT
How is it a mess? The 72 is based at a different garage therefore you wouldn't expect it to have a split/combined allocation. The whole mess involving DEs leaving S and also, 72 would make sense at V if it were to happen. Also, 272 always uses 72's DEs, actually using DE52 now DEs left S because of the 72's PVR cut, with the buses required elsewhere. DE52 seems to be a permanent transfer to V (from the 72 cut). DEs on the 272 are rare which is why I mentioned DE177 which was only it for a few hours. A 72 DE was the 272's V extra bus but DEs on the 272 are not a regular occurrence.
|
|
|
Post by LondonExplorer316 on Jan 30, 2022 19:15:26 GMT
The whole mess involving DEs leaving S and also, 72 would make sense at V if it were to happen. Also, 272 always uses 72's DEs, actually using DE52 now DEs left S because of the 72's PVR cut, with the buses required elsewhere. DE52 seems to be a permanent transfer to V (from the 72 cut). DEs on the 272 are rare which is why I mentioned DE177 which was only it for a few hours. A 72 DE was the 272's V extra bus but DEs on the 272 are not a regular occurrence. Oh my bad, I thought 272 was actually using S's DEs
|
|
|
Post by HV64 on Jan 30, 2022 21:45:26 GMT
HV209 EC>WN
|
|
|
Post by Max B on Jan 31, 2022 12:45:58 GMT
8321 FW 👉🏼 BC.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Feb 1, 2022 13:13:01 GMT
ENL77 DT>GY
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Feb 1, 2022 20:13:40 GMT
ENL 77 DT / Storage? > GY This bus was used on the 347 today. I think its covering for a defective bus.
|
|