|
|
Post by COBO on Aug 21, 2024 19:52:04 GMT
So that they can go to PB for the 263, go to PV to make up the rest of the hybrid allocation for the 483 and to go to HD for the 182 for some reason. The 65 reg transferred in before the 295 was lost. I believe 295 had a PVR cut and they were sent for the new 182 contract. Oh yeah the 295 had a pvr cut. |
|
|
|
Metroline
Aug 22, 2024 5:50:27 GMT
via mobile
Post by Dad91 on Aug 22, 2024 5:50:27 GMT
Since 282 was retained Hybrids are they gonna use current buses TEHs or newer hybrids from any VMHs or VWHs from 4 113s 98 90
|
|
|
|
Post by metrolinewest on Aug 22, 2024 10:16:34 GMT
I still don't understand why some LK65s left G for the 15 reg! Breaking up the LK65 allocation. Does anyone know the reason? So that they can go to PB for the 263, go to PV to make up the rest of the hybrid allocation for the 483 and to go to HD for the 182 for some reason. I guess my next question would be why couldn't the 15 reg go straight to those routes as I remember 92 started fully with 65 reg and then the allocation got mixed |
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Aug 22, 2024 11:51:00 GMT
So that they can go to PB for the 263, go to PV to make up the rest of the hybrid allocation for the 483 and to go to HD for the 182 for some reason. I guess my next question would be why couldn't the 15 reg go straight to those routes as I remember 92 started fully with 65 reg and then the allocation got mixed Why is it a problem that the 92 has got mixed allocation? |
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 22, 2024 13:30:46 GMT
VWH2700 has moved back to AH leaving just 2 of the ex TT VWHs to not be at AH. I wonder if Metroline are trying to unite all of them at AH? Could the 635s allocation be changed from LK65s to BL64s I wonder. As an update to this, all the TT VWHs are now back at AH and a second 635 VWH has left AH for UX this time. |
|
|
|
Post by metrolinewest on Aug 22, 2024 14:45:04 GMT
I guess my next question would be why couldn't the 15 reg go straight to those routes as I remember 92 started fully with 65 reg and then the allocation got mixed Why is it a problem that the 92 has got mixed allocation? I didn't state it was a problem, I'm curious to know why the allocation got changed, I guess you don't know the answer maybe others might know. |
|
|
|
Metroline
Aug 22, 2024 15:36:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by COBO on Aug 22, 2024 15:36:17 GMT
Why is it a problem that the 92 has got mixed allocation? I didn't state it was a problem, I'm curious to know why the allocation got changed, I guess you don't know the answer maybe others might know. It’s probably to do with their ages. |
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Aug 22, 2024 17:57:37 GMT
Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 4, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153.
|
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on Aug 22, 2024 18:00:17 GMT
Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 90, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. WSELs for 153, WDEs for 4 |
|
|
|
Metroline
Aug 22, 2024 18:05:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Aug 22, 2024 18:05:18 GMT
Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 90, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. WSELs for 153, WDEs for 4 Very correct, seems I wrote 90 twice! |
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Aug 22, 2024 18:09:03 GMT
Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 4, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 90, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. When will they be due? And will the WDEs for the E2 and E8 still head to the E2 and E8 or will they be diverted to the 245 and 263 as the E2/E8 tender results says. I see that Metroline are going back and forth with the WDE and BDE I see. |
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 22, 2024 18:09:43 GMT
BDEs on the 90 is rather disappointing for me but I hope that PV will stray the 297s WDEs on the 90 and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 22, 2024 18:14:14 GMT
Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 4, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. Thanks for the info, I've now updated the New Buses on Order list with the relevant buses and their fleetnumbers. |
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Aug 22, 2024 19:22:00 GMT
Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 4, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 90, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. When will they be due? And will the WDEs for the E2 and E8 still head to the E2 and E8 or will they be diverted to the 245 and 263 as the E2/E8 tender results says. I see that Metroline are going back and forth with the WDE and BDE I see. See its the usual Thursday TLB leak day on the forum. One week I might get to read the news first hand in print. LOTS provide details of the order but they don't have a crystal ball and can't predict delivery dates. |
|
|
|
Post by DE20106 on Aug 22, 2024 19:34:11 GMT
Seen in a few other places it's suggested to be WDEs for the 4, E2 and E8, BDEs for the 90 and 98 and Kites for the 153. Very interesting odd choices and completely backwards. WDEs (4) for the garage that already has and will have BDEs (43/W7) Kites/WSELs (153) at the garage that already has BELs (46) BDEs (90) for the garage that will have WDEs (83/297) BDEs (98) at the garage with Wrightbus/Volvos Like honestly who thought this up 😂 Unless there’s length restrictions affecting the 4/E2/E8, I can honestly see some retrospective switcharoos happening to make things a little more standardised, well as much a possibile anyway |
|
