|
Post by WH241 on Oct 1, 2022 10:50:09 GMT
I've heard if the 507 extension happens, it will remain single deck. Means nothing, TfL could use the 11 number instead as they did in one document. JUNIOR26 was talking about the buses staying on the route not which number would be used.
|
|
|
Post by JUNIOR26 on Oct 1, 2022 10:56:03 GMT
I've heard if the 507 extension happens, it will remain single deck. Means nothing, TfL could use the 11 number instead as they did in one document. All this nonsense I've been hearing of renumbering since the Central London bus changes were out. It really doesn't matter about the route number it's the 'link' that's the most important thing not route numbers, TFL couldn't care less and I don't see passengers being too bothered on route numbers and when the consultation report comes out, I believe most will go ahead but some amendments will be made which will NOT include renumbering.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Oct 1, 2022 11:00:21 GMT
Means nothing, TfL could use the 11 number instead as they did in one document. All this nonsense I've been hearing of renumbering since the Central London bus changes were out. It really doesn't matter about the route number it's the 'link' that's the most important thing not route numbers, TFL couldn't care less and I don't see passengers being too bothered on route numbers and when the consultation report comes out, I believe most will go ahead but some amendments will be made which will NOT include renumbering. Honestly dreading the day the outcome is published as there will be outrage here no matter what the results are.
|
|
|
Post by BE37054 (quoll662) on Oct 1, 2022 11:27:53 GMT
Means nothing, TfL could use the 11 number instead as they did in one document. All this nonsense I've been hearing of renumbering since the Central London bus changes were out. It really doesn't matter about the route number it's the 'link' that's the most important thing not route numbers, TFL couldn't care less and I don't see passengers being too bothered on route numbers and when the consultation report comes out, I believe most will go ahead but some amendments will be made which will NOT include renumbering. I agree with that - I hope the 14 and 74 numbers aren't retained in favour of 414/430 - but am just simply stating that the 507 could be withdrawn with 11 rerouted to Waterloo i.e. use number 11 instead of number 507.
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Oct 1, 2022 11:49:46 GMT
All this nonsense I've been hearing of renumbering since the Central London bus changes were out. It really doesn't matter about the route number it's the 'link' that's the most important thing not route numbers, TFL couldn't care less and I don't see passengers being too bothered on route numbers and when the consultation report comes out, I believe most will go ahead but some amendments will be made which will NOT include renumbering. I agree with that - I hope the 14 and 74 numbers aren't retained in favour of 414/430 - but am just simply stating that the 507 could be withdrawn with 11 rerouted to Waterloo i.e. use number 11 instead of number 507. Technically the 14/74 wouldn't be re numberings but more route restructurings to include parts of the 414 and 430.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Oct 1, 2022 12:03:58 GMT
All this nonsense I've been hearing of renumbering since the Central London bus changes were out. It really doesn't matter about the route number it's the 'link' that's the most important thing not route numbers, TFL couldn't care less and I don't see passengers being too bothered on route numbers and when the consultation report comes out, I believe most will go ahead but some amendments will be made which will NOT include renumbering. I agree with that - I hope the 14 and 74 numbers aren't retained in favour of 414/430 - but am just simply stating that the 507 could be withdrawn with 11 rerouted to Waterloo i.e. use number 11 instead of number 507. But the reason this came up in discussion was about the buses being used. No matter which number it seems likely the existing buses from the 507 would be used.
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Oct 2, 2022 2:57:44 GMT
Will something have to move out of NP in order to fit the 91 in or will N91 provide enough space?
|
|
|
Post by richard on Oct 2, 2022 4:05:05 GMT
Will something have to move out of NP in order to fit the 91 in or will N91 provide enough space? Isn't the 214 or 153 now at RA?
|
|
|
Post by JUNIOR26 on Oct 2, 2022 4:10:22 GMT
Will something have to move out of NP in order to fit the 91 in or will N91 provide enough space? Isn't the 214 or 153 now at RA? Yep, 153 is at RA with 214 still at NP.
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Oct 2, 2022 4:43:10 GMT
Will something have to move out of NP in order to fit the 91 in or will N91 provide enough space? Isn't the 214 or 153 now at RA? Wasn’t that to create space for the W15.
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Oct 2, 2022 4:43:25 GMT
Will something have to move out of NP in order to fit the 91 in or will N91 provide enough space? Isn't the 214 or 153 now at RA? Wasn’t that to create space for the W15.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2022 5:12:42 GMT
Isn't the 214 or 153 now at RA? Wasn’t that to create space for the W15. The 153 is - 214 still at NP
|
|
|
Post by abellion on Oct 2, 2022 8:46:59 GMT
Is it true that EH181 and 278 are both at AL?
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Oct 2, 2022 10:54:44 GMT
Are SEe61-64 actually allocated to the 444 at NP or are they just spares? Perhaps two of those could form the 359's new allocation when it converts to electrics.
|
|
|
Post by MoEnviro on Oct 2, 2022 11:02:11 GMT
Are SEe61-64 actually allocated to the 444 at NP or are they just spares? Perhaps two of those could form the 359's new allocation when it converts to electrics. The buses for the 359 will be formed from the Route 184
|
|