|
|
Post by wirewiper on May 31, 2024 17:29:15 GMT
Do you know if the 469 will increase in PVR when it is extended to Kidbrooke on the 15th June. Unless I have missed something, route 469 is not being extended to Kidbrooke on 15th June. |
|
|
|
Post by cl54 on May 31, 2024 20:51:45 GMT
Do you know if the 469 will increase in PVR when it is extended to Kidbrooke on the 15th June. There is no proposal for the route to be extended and even then finding a terminus would be difficult. |
|
|
|
Post by mb171 on May 31, 2024 21:01:58 GMT
Do you know if the 469 will increase in PVR when it is extended to Kidbrooke on the 15th June. come again? 469 to Kidbrooke? I doubt there's space to accommodate another route in Kidbrooke let alone 3 routes at the station. 469 is already a snakey route and to be honest Kidbrooke already has sufficient routes running through the area, I don't think the area needs anymore routes. |
|
|
|
Post by london23 on May 31, 2024 21:13:06 GMT
Do you know if SEN47 will ever return to service as it had a bad accident last September.
|
|
|
|
Post by DT 11 on May 31, 2024 21:28:10 GMT
Do you know if the 469 will increase in PVR when it is extended to Kidbrooke on the 15th June. come again? 469 to Kidbrooke? I doubt there's space to accommodate another route in Kidbrooke let alone 3 routes at the station. 469 is already a snakey route and to be honest Kidbrooke already has sufficient routes running through the area, I don't think the area needs anymore routes. Kidbrooke Station has no terminus anymore. 335 & B16 stand on Moorehead Way definitely no space for anything else. If another route was to go via Kidbrooke then could easily be accommodated as it would not be stopping there. As for 469 to Kidbrooke who dreamt that up? |
|
|
|
Post by london23 on Jun 1, 2024 9:42:43 GMT
I found it on the London bus Wikipedia page it said changes that 469 would be extended to Kidbrooke from the 15th June but when you said I realised it must be mistake as it isn't anywhere else.
|
|
|
|
Post by DE20106 on Jun 1, 2024 10:04:01 GMT
I found it on the London bus Wikipedia page it said changes that 469 would be extended to Kidbrooke from the 15th June but when you said I realised it must be mistake as it isn't anywhere else. Yeah Wikipedia and wiki fandoms etc are notoriously - shall we say - ‘ropey’ sources of information  🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Jun 1, 2024 10:34:55 GMT
I found it on the London bus Wikipedia page it said changes that 469 would be extended to Kidbrooke from the 15th June but when you said I realised it must be mistake as it isn't anywhere else. Yeah Wikipedia and wiki fandoms etc are notoriously - shall we say - ‘ropey’ sources of information 🤣 In all fairness I'd not lump Wikipedia in with the various Wikia fandoms around. Wikipedia has some extremely militant policing going on to ensure sources are cited. |
|
|
|
Post by PGAT on Jun 1, 2024 10:57:03 GMT
Wikipedia removes some pieces of information for not being cited and leaves some blatantly wrong things. A while back I tried to edit the SL5 page as someone had wrote it couldn't use double deckers because of a low bridge, and they cited 3 sources that did not mention that at all. Needless to say there were quite a few undos but I eventually got the information corrected. The fandom is much better in that regard as its written by enthusiasts who know what they're on about
|
|
|
|
Post by YY13VKP on Jun 1, 2024 11:23:05 GMT
Does anyone know if SEe243 has moved permanently to A or is it going to return to Croydon at some point? I saw it in Sutton on Thursday night on the S2 - a bit strange it's still at A despite the S2's buses all being in service now.
|
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jun 1, 2024 11:53:32 GMT
Wikipedia removes some pieces of information for not being cited and leaves some blatantly wrong things. A while back I tried to edit the SL5 page as someone had wrote it couldn't use double deckers because of a low bridge, and they cited 3 sources that did not mention that at all. Needless to say there were quite a few undos but I eventually got the information corrected. The fandom is much better in that regard as its written by enthusiasts who know what they're on about Whilst I’d agree with you regarding Wikipedia, I can’t agree that the fandom is much better - there are numerous examples on here where someone has mentioned something on a fandom and been completely false or wrong which is why the minute fandom is mentioned on here, most will dismiss it |
|
|
|
Post by PGAT on Jun 1, 2024 12:23:02 GMT
Does anyone know if SEe243 has moved permanently to A or is it going to return to Croydon at some point? I saw it in Sutton on Thursday night on the S2 - a bit strange it's still at A despite the S2's buses all being in service now. I think it’s permanent presumably the S2 needs that extra spare much more since it cannot sub any other vehicle from A. Also now that the 439’s batch has arrived at C SEe243 probably isnt needed |
|
|
|
Post by PGAT on Jun 1, 2024 12:24:29 GMT
Wikipedia removes some pieces of information for not being cited and leaves some blatantly wrong things. A while back I tried to edit the SL5 page as someone had wrote it couldn't use double deckers because of a low bridge, and they cited 3 sources that did not mention that at all. Needless to say there were quite a few undos but I eventually got the information corrected. The fandom is much better in that regard as its written by enthusiasts who know what they're on about Whilst I’d agree with you regarding Wikipedia, I can’t agree that the fandom is much better - there are numerous examples on here where someone has mentioned something on a fandom and been completely false or wrong which is why the minute fandom is mentioned on here, most will dismiss it That is also true but it is more comprehensive than wikipedia - most routes do not justify their own page on wikipedia |
|
|
|
Post by DE20106 on Jun 1, 2024 13:16:08 GMT
EH244 is VOR after what looks like a fight with a tree, which it very much lost
|
|
|
|
Post by southlondon413 on Jun 1, 2024 13:32:02 GMT
EH244 is VOR after what looks like a fight with a tree, which it very much lost It hit the roof of a low bridge in Victoria. |
|
🤣
