|
|
Post by DT 11 on Mar 25, 2013 23:35:13 GMT
Is fullwell really that big that is can house 250 vehicles? Also Holloway 230? more like 210. TL can hold 200? upton park 205? With TL I thought it was 140, but they have a large yard. |
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Mar 25, 2013 23:38:08 GMT
Is BN's total of 140 in the document including the Tramshed as well as it's part of BN.
|
|
|
|
Post by DT 11 on Mar 25, 2013 23:43:30 GMT
Abellios Fulwell is not on that list.
|
|
|
|
Post by londonbusboy on Mar 26, 2013 3:03:22 GMT
How accurate is that list?
|
|
|
|
Post by VPL630 on Mar 26, 2013 19:05:51 GMT
UX
DX
SI
SW
MB
AV
|
|
|
|
Post by Tangy on Mar 26, 2013 20:25:51 GMT
The capacities for Fulwell, Edgware and Mandela Way are as a whole, as one complete building, rather than the "split" that they are now.
BN does include the tramshed outstation.
MB figures may have been before the recent building work there to expand the depot, to which I will amend on the webpage to be more realistic.
These depot capacity figures have been sourced from bits and pieces of information, though are largely accurate and does include the actual physical capacity (i.e. cram em in to the door).
|
|
|
|
Post by londonbusboy on Mar 27, 2013 3:07:38 GMT
The capacities for Fulwell, Edgware and Mandela Way are as a whole, as one complete building, rather than the "split" that they are now. BN does include the tramshed outstation. MB figures may have been before the recent building work there to expand the depot, to which I will amend on the webpage to be more realistic. These depot capacity figures have been sourced from bits and pieces of information, though are largely accurate and does include the actual physical capacity (i.e. cram em in to the door). Ok i will have to try and find out what the max capacity of TB is, as im guessing they would park buses on Lower Gravel Road and in the rear car park if needed |
|
|
|
Post by romfordbuses on Mar 27, 2013 6:26:07 GMT
NS (Romford) is full iirc, Buses get parked outside when I pass late at night.
|
|
|
|
Post by Connor on Mar 31, 2013 19:12:35 GMT
Is fullwell really that big that is can house 250 vehicles? Also Holloway 230? more like 210. TL can hold 200? upton park 205? Do bear in mind TL lost a lot of routes over the years, the 54, 75, 160, 181, 202, 284 all used to live there alongside most of the current routes, and at its peak it had a PVR of something like 140-150 When did Stagecoach lose the 160? |
|
|
|
Post by Connor on Mar 31, 2013 19:24:04 GMT
When did Stagecoach lose the 160? Around 2006, not that long after the 181 and 284 were lost. Cheers.  |
|
|
|
Post by DT 11 on Mar 31, 2013 19:26:20 GMT
Is fullwell really that big that is can house 250 vehicles? Also Holloway 230? more like 210. TL can hold 200? upton park 205? Do bear in mind TL lost a lot of routes over the years, the 54, 75, 160, 181, 202, 284 all used to live there alongside most of the current routes, and at its peak it had a PVR of something like 140-150 Those losses were compensated by the 178 & 380. If Stagecoach gain the 54 & 75 back this year I won't be surprised. I'm hoping it does tbh, because I don't want TB to close, whenever Stagecoach Selkent loose something TL are always compensated with something as they have lost a huge amount of work in the past.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2013 19:45:07 GMT
The 178 and 380 only partially make up for the losses
|
|
|
|
Post by DT 11 on Mar 31, 2013 20:59:05 GMT
Those losses were compensated by the 178 & 380. If Stagecoach gain the 54 & 75 back this year I won't be surprised. I'm hoping it does tbh, because I don't want TB to close, whenever Stagecoach Selkent loose something TL are always compensated with something as they have lost a huge amount of work in the past. The 178, 273, 354, 356 did not particularly cover the losses at all really - they total 27 PVR. The loss of the 54, 75, 160, 181, 202, 284 represents 75 PVR. (approx) Stagecoach shouldn't really have a reason to close TB, anyway. Londonbusboy commented one time that if the 51 & 96 are lost then TB work would be housed at PD and TL. This would result in job losses. Tbh I don't want to see that happening.. |
|
|
|
Post by IanF on Mar 31, 2013 21:32:36 GMT
The 178, 273, 354, 356 did not particularly cover the losses at all really - they total 27 PVR. The loss of the 54, 75, 160, 181, 202, 284 represents 75 PVR. (approx) Stagecoach shouldn't really have a reason to close TB, anyway. Londonbusboy commented one time that if the 51 & 96 are lost then TB work would be housed at PD and TL. This would result in job losses. Tbh I don't want to see that happening.. As the resident Stagecoach manager said he would not propose that happening as it would make the company have issues in the long term. I much prefer that opinion as hes the boss. |
|
|
|
Post by DT 11 on Mar 31, 2013 22:29:21 GMT
Londonbusboy commented one time that if the 51 & 96 are lost then TB work would be housed at PD and TL. This would result in job losses. Tbh I don't want to see that happening.. As the resident Stagecoach manager said he would not propose that happening as it would make the company have issues in the long term. I much prefer that opinion as hes the boss. It certainly would cause issues! |
|
