|
Post by someone on Jun 25, 2021 17:09:59 GMT
IDEA: Route P4 will be withdrawn between Lewisham and Dulwich, being diverted to end in a loop around Dulwich via Gallery Road. Lewisham to Brockley section: replaced by new route 369 operating to Bromley North. Brockley to Horniman Museum section: replaced by diversion of Route 122 via Honor Oak Park.
|
|
|
Post by twobellstogo on Jun 25, 2021 17:18:08 GMT
IDEA: Route P4 will be withdrawn between Lewisham and Dulwich, being diverted to end in a loop around Dulwich via Gallery Road. Lewisham to Brockley section: replaced by new route 369 operating to Bromley North. Brockley to Horniman Museum section: replaced by diversion of Route 122 via Honor Oak Park. How much do you know about the P4? Chopping off the eastern end of the P4 would be as popular as opening a cake box and finding a dog poo inside instead.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jun 25, 2021 17:34:13 GMT
Route 369 (basically, a revised Route 342): a single-deck route allocated at Bromley (TB) running between Lewisham Station and Bromley North, via Ladywell, Forest Hill, Sydenham, Penge and Beckenham.
Lewisham Station to Bromley North: LEWISHAM STATION (C) Lewisham Centre (X) Morley Road (Y) Wearside Road (HD) Ladywell Station (HC) Ladywell Road/Phoebeth Road (HZ) Gordonbrock School/Brockley Cemetery (T) Huxbear Street (U) Ladywell Road/Crofton Park Road (V) Brockley Jack (N) MacLean Road (HP) Brockley Rise (HD) Devonshire Road/Honor Oak Park Station (new stop, A)
Devonshire Road/Boveney Road (new stop, B) Tyson Road (new stop, C) Devonshire Road/Ewelme Road (new stop, D) Woodcombe Crescent (new stop, E) Forest Hill Station/Devonshire Road (F) Forest Hill Pools (no letter) Dartmouth Road/Thorpewood Avenue (M) Sydenham School (P) Sydenham/The Woodman (R) Peak Hill (Z) Sydenham Station/Kirkdale (F) Studland Road (U) Penge East Station (V) Alexandra Road (new stop, W) Kent House Fields (new stop, X) Lennard Road/Kent House Road (new stop, no letter) Harris Girls' Academy Bromley (new stop, no letter) Kings Hall Road (new stop, no letter) Bridge Road (new stop, F) Sellindge Close (new stop, G) (unfinished)
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jun 25, 2021 17:34:58 GMT
IDEA: Route P4 will be withdrawn between Lewisham and Dulwich, being diverted to end in a loop around Dulwich via Gallery Road. Lewisham to Brockley section: replaced by new route 369 operating to Bromley North. Brockley to Horniman Museum section: replaced by diversion of Route 122 via Honor Oak Park. How much do you know about the P4? Chopping off the eastern end of the P4 would be as popular as opening a cake box and finding a dog poo inside instead. Okay, perhaps it could just go to Catford Bridge instead of Lewisham.
|
|
|
Post by twobellstogo on Jun 25, 2021 18:29:13 GMT
How much do you know about the P4? Chopping off the eastern end of the P4 would be as popular as opening a cake box and finding a dog poo inside instead. Okay, perhaps it could just go to Catford Bridge instead of Lewisham. Lewisham is much the better traffic objective. I wouldn’t reroute the P4.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jun 26, 2021 8:45:55 GMT
Okay, perhaps it could just go to Catford Bridge instead of Lewisham. Lewisham is much the better traffic objective. I wouldn’t reroute the P4. The reason I'm suggesting Catford Bridge is to cover for my idea of diverting the 320 to terminate at Lewisham.
|
|
|
Post by LondonNorthern on Jun 26, 2021 9:48:40 GMT
Lewisham is much the better traffic objective. I wouldn’t reroute the P4. The reason I'm suggesting Catford Bridge is to cover for my idea of diverting the 320 to terminate at Lewisham. Whilst I agree with another Bromley - Lewisham route (which could very well be the 320 or the extension of the 199 for costs reasons to Ringers Road and the 320 hacked back to Bromley) the P4 should not need to be split in half or diverted to somewhere where it isn't needed being Catford.
Whilst I appreciate the P4 is not the most direct route from Brixton to Lewisham, it is the only direct link without needing to catch a 345 then a 136/436.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jun 26, 2021 10:13:25 GMT
Lewisham is much the better traffic objective. I wouldn’t reroute the P4. The reason I'm suggesting Catford Bridge is to cover for my idea of diverting the 320 to terminate at Lewisham. I understand that this is the fantasy thread where the wacky stuff goes but how does diverting the P4 cover for the 320 - the 320 approaches Catford from the south and the P4 would approach from the west. It would be great if a Brixton to Catford route popped up at some stage but not at the expense of messing around with the P4.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jun 26, 2021 12:59:52 GMT
The reason I'm suggesting Catford Bridge is to cover for my idea of diverting the 320 to terminate at Lewisham. I understand that this is the fantasy thread where the wacky stuff goes but how does diverting the P4 cover for the 320 - the 320 approaches Catford from the south and the P4 would approach from the west. It would be great if a Brixton to Catford route popped up at some stage but not at the expense of messing around with the P4. Because then, Thomas' Lane would only be served by the 160.
|
|
|
Post by LondonNorthern on Jun 26, 2021 13:11:31 GMT
I understand that this is the fantasy thread where the wacky stuff goes but how does diverting the P4 cover for the 320 - the 320 approaches Catford from the south and the P4 would approach from the west. It would be great if a Brixton to Catford route popped up at some stage but not at the expense of messing around with the P4. Because then, Thomas' Lane would only be served by the 160. Thomas Lane doesn't have to be served at all, it's only there for the stand. Plus, the 336 also serves Thomas Lane as well
|
|
|
Post by elcesteem16 on Jun 26, 2021 17:23:56 GMT
You do know Thomas Lane is the stand area right for the 160/320/336??? The stop is adequately served by routes that start there.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jun 26, 2021 18:03:45 GMT
I understand that this is the fantasy thread where the wacky stuff goes but how does diverting the P4 cover for the 320 - the 320 approaches Catford from the south and the P4 would approach from the west. It would be great if a Brixton to Catford route popped up at some stage but not at the expense of messing around with the P4. Because then, Thomas' Lane would only be served by the 160. I don’t think you understand - the 320 comes from the south & the P4 would come from the west so how can it cover it.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jun 26, 2021 21:27:41 GMT
You do know Thomas Lane is the stand area right for the 160/320/336??? The stop is adequately served by routes that start there. The stand is called Catford Bridge Station. The first stop on routes 160, 320 and 336 going from Catford Bridge is Thomas' Lane (Q).
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jun 26, 2021 21:32:36 GMT
Route 160: to be cut back to Chislehurst Gordon Arms and to be rerouted via Middle Park Avenue and Court Road. Route 269 already serves the section to Sidcup.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jun 26, 2021 22:14:07 GMT
You do know Thomas Lane is the stand area right for the 160/320/336??? The stop is adequately served by routes that start there. The stand is called Catford Bridge Station. The first stop on routes 160, 320 and 336 going from Catford Bridge is Thomas' Lane (Q). The stand is called Thomas Lane which is located just north of the first bus stop also called Thomas Lane - the alighting point is called Catford Bridge Station.
|
|