|
Post by ServerKing on Jan 6, 2015 18:36:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by M1104 on Jan 7, 2015 12:31:58 GMT
I always thought diesel engines were supposed to be less polluting than petrol.
|
|
|
Post by smoothcriminal on Jan 7, 2015 14:42:12 GMT
I always thought diesel engines were supposed to be less polluting than petrol. Nope they give off less co2 which pleased the loony man made global warning brigade but they churn out nox and carcogenic (sp) pollutants which are a million times worse for our health.
|
|
|
Post by John tuthill on Jan 7, 2015 15:21:39 GMT
I always thought diesel engines were supposed to be less polluting than petrol. Nope they give off less co2 which pleased the loony man made global warning brigade but they churn out nox and carcogenic (sp) pollutants which are a million times worse for our health. I don't think it's fair to blame the buses only, after all 'oil engines' date back to the pre war ST's. We as motorist have been conned over the years, in that diesel cars were more fuel efficient, that I can vouch for getting 50-60 mpg out of a Vectra, plus the amount of road freight there now is compared to when the majority went by rail, Smithfield having its own underground sidings. We were conned over eggs, now apparently there safe(!!) The so called 'experts' won't be happy 'til we've gone from carbon fuel to electric, in time they'll be decried, then cycles until we're back to walking!! RANT OVER
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 18:53:00 GMT
Global Warming is a real issue and we do need to move to more renewable energy sources, electric vehicles, etc.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jan 7, 2015 22:46:20 GMT
Global Warming is a real issue and we do need to move to more renewable energy sources, electric vehicles, etc. But not at the expense of small businesses which is what the Ultra LEZ would be achieving.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 22:51:36 GMT
Global Warming is a real issue and we do need to move to more renewable energy sources, electric vehicles, etc. But not at the expense of small businesses which is what the Ultra LEZ would be achieving. Not in my opinion, the environment and global warming is a major problem and if small businesses suffer then so be it. Small businesses can not really be more important than our own planet which is already suffering. If global warming continues then millions, even billions will suffer.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jan 7, 2015 22:55:31 GMT
But not at the expense of small businesses which is what the Ultra LEZ would be achieving. Not in my opinion, the environment and global warming is a major problem and if small businesses suffer then so be it. Small businesses can not really be more important than our own planet which is already suffering. If global warming continues then millions, even billions will suffer. Small businesses are the backbone of the economy and should be supported otherwise we could be in grave danger long before climate change gets us all - you do know that scientists are not even sure if we've gone past the irreversible stage yet!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 23:08:49 GMT
Not in my opinion, the environment and global warming is a major problem and if small businesses suffer then so be it. Small businesses can not really be more important than our own planet which is already suffering. If global warming continues then millions, even billions will suffer. Small businesses are the backbone of the economy and should be supported otherwise we could be in grave danger long before climate change gets us all - you do know that scientists are not even sure if we've gone past the irreversible stage yet! I understand that, but at the moment global warming is the immediate issue and not enough is being done, therefore it should be prioritised.
|
|
|
Post by Danny on Jan 7, 2015 23:22:08 GMT
Small businesses are the backbone of the economy and should be supported otherwise we could be in grave danger long before climate change gets us all - you do know that scientists are not even sure if we've gone past the irreversible stage yet! I understand that, but at the moment global warming is the immediate issue and not enough is being done, therefore it should be prioritised. Surely the economy is the more immediate thing, and global warming is more of a long term issue?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 23:26:11 GMT
I understand that, but at the moment global warming is the immediate issue and not enough is being done, therefore it should be prioritised. Surely the economy is the more immediate thing, and global warming is more of a long term issue? Not really, you see that's the problem. People don't realise how serious global warming is. A lot of the recent bad weather in the UK and around the world is at least partly due to global warming.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 23:30:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Jan 8, 2015 0:21:47 GMT
Surely the economy is the more immediate thing, and global warming is more of a long term issue? Not really, you see that's the problem. People don't realise how serious global warming is. A lot of the recent bad weather in the UK and around the world is at least partly due to global warming. I don't think you know how serious the economy is. Don't you think that people will need money in order to fight Global Warming.
|
|
|
Post by twobellstogo on Jan 8, 2015 23:33:29 GMT
Surely the economy is the more immediate thing, and global warming is more of a long term issue? Not really, you see that's the problem. People don't realise how serious global warming is. A lot of the recent bad weather in the UK and around the world is at least partly due to global warming. Temperatures have risen on average over the last few years, yes, and there's a good chance that is global warming in action. But it's far too early to say for sure about other weather phenomena. As for your small business ideas, I am so glad you're not in government. Punitive restrictions on small business (and I am one of those) equals businesses going under. Which means higher unemployment. Which means inability to pay for essentials which means more people unable to keep a roof over their heads. Which means intolerable strain on welfare and more homelessness. I could go on, but the ultimate destination of Safwaanf1 pecuniary policies would be chaos and possible social breakdown. Have another think
|
|
|
Post by ServerKing on Jan 9, 2015 6:07:18 GMT
Nope they give off less co2 which pleased the loony man made global warning brigade but they churn out nox and carcogenic (sp) pollutants which are a million times worse for our health. I don't think it's fair to blame the buses only, after all 'oil engines' date back to the pre war ST's. We as motorist have been conned over the years, in that diesel cars were more fuel efficient, that I can vouch for getting 50-60 mpg out of a Vectra, plus the amount of road freight there now is compared to when the majority went by rail, Smithfield having its own underground sidings. We were conned over eggs, now apparently there safe(!!) The so called 'experts' won't be happy 'til we've gone from carbon fuel to electric, in time they'll be decried, then cycles until we're back to walking!! RANT OVER lol But what if walking excessively damages my ankle ligaments? And if I was overweight (soon to become a disability : and at risk of tripping over on Islington's uneven pavement slabs... what then? I never listen to these 'experts' or 'think tanks' as their views change too rapidly... like West Ham at the top of the league, these silly transport ideas don't last for long Look how we marvelled at the uber efficient bendy bus... until they started catching fire, blocking junctions and becoming a magnet for fare evasion... Joe Public will soon cotton on that the 'conductor' can't force him to tap in with his card, and we're back to the '40-percent-chance-of-getting-caught-hell-i'll-risk-it' scenario... or the next Mayor may just use the next 4 years to undo the work of the current one
|
|