|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Jul 12, 2021 10:29:19 GMT
Are you saying the 206 has a spelling mistake as ‘Bent Park’ instead of Brent Park, as Brent Park superstores and Wembley Park are 2 different places. Plus if you saying why the 206 is currently showing Brent Park, it’s because of a certain football match going on. The stand for the 108 is by the Shopping Centre. The route does not pass the station. The 108 very much does pass the station heading towards Lewisham.
|
|
|
Post by M1104 on Jul 12, 2021 10:42:31 GMT
HV17 yesterday on the 333 with the rear showing 19.
|
|
|
Post by cl54 on Jul 12, 2021 11:45:45 GMT
The stand for the 108 is by the Shopping Centre. The route does not pass the station. The 108 very much does pass the station heading towards Lewisham. Accepted but it does continue in service to the shopping centre.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jul 12, 2021 16:08:23 GMT
Are you saying the 206 has a spelling mistake as ‘Bent Park’ instead of Brent Park, as Brent Park superstores and Wembley Park are 2 different places. Plus if you saying why the 206 is currently showing Brent Park, it’s because of a certain football match going on. Sorry about the spelling mistake, I was in a rush. Also, the blinds have been like this since before the Euros started.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jul 12, 2021 16:11:09 GMT
The stand for the 108 is by the Shopping Centre. The route does not pass the station. The 108 alighting point is Lewisham Station (AP), although its starting point is Lewisham Centre (V). In my opinion, the starting point should be Lewisham Station (D).
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jul 12, 2021 17:22:28 GMT
The stand for the 108 is by the Shopping Centre. The route does not pass the station. The 108 alighting point is Lewisham Station (AP), although its starting point is Lewisham Centre (V). In my opinion, the starting point should be Lewisham Station (D). That makes no sense - the reason why Lewisham Centre is the first stop is because it starts there. Having the first stop at Lewisham Station means adding on unnecessary time to get from the stand to the station
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jul 12, 2021 18:32:20 GMT
The 108 alighting point is Lewisham Station (AP), although its starting point is Lewisham Centre (V). In my opinion, the starting point should be Lewisham Station (D). That makes no sense - the reason why Lewisham Centre is the first stop is because it starts there. Having the first stop at Lewisham Station means adding on unnecessary time to get from the stand to the station Either that, or the terminus could be Molesworth Street.
|
|
|
Post by cl54 on Jul 12, 2021 20:45:40 GMT
The stand for the 108 is by the Shopping Centre. The route does not pass the station. The 108 alighting point is Lewisham Station (AP), although its starting point is Lewisham Centre (V). In my opinion, the starting point should be Lewisham Station (D). There is not enough stand space at the station. AP is an alighting point but buses also set down by the shopping centre before moving to the stand. Departing buses on the 108 pick up in the market area which is much more useful. The latest road layout in the station area is terrible. Severe delays are caused to all routes.
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Jul 12, 2021 23:04:59 GMT
The 108 alighting point is Lewisham Station (AP), although its starting point is Lewisham Centre (V). In my opinion, the starting point should be Lewisham Station (D). There is not enough stand space at the station. AP is an alighting point but buses also set down by the shopping centre before moving to the stand. Departing buses on the 108 pick up in the market area which is much more useful. The latest road layout in the station area is terrible. Severe delays are caused to all routes. The 108s set down is actually Lewisham Station and it does not continue to the centre in service, been on that route plenty of times and hear the "This bus terminates here" announcement played at Lewisham Station. You can go on TfL, LVF, even the timetables and see that the last stop is at the station. The schedule also supports this with the last stop being shown as "Lewisham Bus Station, Station Road"
|
|
|
Post by cl54 on Jul 13, 2021 6:57:01 GMT
There is not enough stand space at the station. AP is an alighting point but buses also set down by the shopping centre before moving to the stand. Departing buses on the 108 pick up in the market area which is much more useful. The latest road layout in the station area is terrible. Severe delays are caused to all routes. The 108s set down is actually Lewisham Station and it does not continue to the centre in service, been on that route plenty of times and hear the "This bus terminates here" announcement played at Lewisham Station. You can go on TfL, LVF, even the timetables and see that the last stop is at the station. The schedule also supports this with the last stop being shown as "Lewisham Bus Station, Station Road" I have to accept this but I saw 2 people get off at the shopping centre last Saturday.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2021 8:11:35 GMT
An E7 this morning had the blind 'Charville Lane Estate' on the front, with U7 on the back. Not sure what the side blind was. It was definitely an E7 because it was on Ruislip Road and had passengers.
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Jul 13, 2021 9:14:21 GMT
AE11 on the 298 has Railway Replacement on its side blind
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jul 13, 2021 15:52:24 GMT
The 108 alighting point is Lewisham Station (AP), although its starting point is Lewisham Centre (V). In my opinion, the starting point should be Lewisham Station (D). There is not enough stand space at the station. AP is an alighting point but buses also set down by the shopping centre before moving to the stand. Departing buses on the 108 pick up in the market area which is much more useful. The latest road layout in the station area is terrible. Severe delays are caused to all routes. The 108 should end at Molesworth Street, then, replacing the 180 stand space (the 180 will be diverted to North Greenwich and the 129 to East Dulwich via Lewisham and Brockley).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 9:15:28 GMT
114 to Hayes Bourne Avenue
|
|
|
Post by kmkcheng on Jul 20, 2021 9:57:29 GMT
114 to Hayes Bourne Avenue That would be quite an extension for the 114
|
|