|
Post by Busboy105 on Jul 20, 2021 11:38:02 GMT
DEM1339 wasn't showing a side blind for the 382 (seen yesterday)
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Jul 20, 2021 11:50:50 GMT
186 on the R8 yet side on R3 Orpington Station
|
|
|
Post by BK15AZR on Jul 20, 2021 22:55:10 GMT
VWH2339 on the 91, with the rear blind showing "N91".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 8:48:29 GMT
E7 showing Uxbridge on the front and West Ealing Sutherland Avenue on the side Then changed to Hayes on the front (nothing beneath) and West Ealing Broadway on the side
|
|
|
Post by BE37054 (quoll662) on Jul 21, 2021 10:03:35 GMT
E7 showing Uxbridge on the front and West Ealing Sutherland Avenue on the side Then changed to Hayes on the front (nothing beneath) and West Ealing Broadway on the side Was this a GW bus? I wouldn't have thought that the SD's there would have Uxbridge on the blinds. (Of course the DD's would as the 427 operates from there.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 10:12:08 GMT
E7 showing Uxbridge on the front and West Ealing Sutherland Avenue on the side Then changed to Hayes on the front (nothing beneath) and West Ealing Broadway on the side Was this a GW bus? I wouldn't have thought that the SD's there would have Uxbridge on the blinds. (Of course the DD's would as the 427 operates from there.) I'm not sure but the bus number was 8880
|
|
|
Post by BE37054 (quoll662) on Jul 21, 2021 10:16:57 GMT
Was this a GW bus? I wouldn't have thought that the SD's there would have Uxbridge on the blinds. (Of course the DD's would as the 427 operates from there.) I'm not sure but the bus number was 8880 It's a 195 bus at GW.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 10:27:02 GMT
I'm not sure but the bus number was 8880 It's a 195 bus at GW. Interesting. Coincidentally this is page 195!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2021 8:57:46 GMT
h11 with Preston Road station on the front
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Jul 22, 2021 17:46:30 GMT
TE978 on the 125 had the white rectangle instead of Colindale Station on its front blind DE53 on the 298 has its destination blind blank. Noticed this with a couple of Sullivans Buses as of late
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Jul 23, 2021 9:06:59 GMT
DW416 on the 121 has "via Edmonton" on its side blind
|
|
|
Post by dashing0ne on Jul 24, 2021 6:16:02 GMT
DW416 on the 121 has "via Edmonton" on its side blind That is not a banditry or incorrect blind. They used to always write via, which is good imo but they later got rid of it so some older blindsets will show this, in fact imo its good and definetley not banditry or incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by wirewiper on Jul 24, 2021 7:41:37 GMT
DW416 on the 121 has "via Edmonton" on its side blind That is not a banditry or incorrect blind. They used to always write via, which is good imo but they later got rid of it so some older blindsets will show this, in fact imo its good and definetley not banditry or incorrect. "Not banditry or incorrect" - since when did the 121 serve Edmonton?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2021 10:39:38 GMT
91 to Old Kent Road Tesco on the front, but 168 on the back.
|
|
|
Post by Busboy105 on Jul 24, 2021 10:43:45 GMT
DW416 on the 121 has "via Edmonton" on its side blind That is not a banditry or incorrect blind. They used to always write via, which is good imo but they later got rid of it so some older blindsets will show this, in fact imo its good and definetley not banditry or incorrect. I do get what you mean but it is incorrect because the 121 doesn't serve Edmonton and its correct one is "via Enfield".
|
|