|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Jun 1, 2016 19:03:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by john on Jun 1, 2016 21:29:52 GMT
Already put my reply to them, it wasn't positive either
|
|
|
|
Post by Unorm on Jul 17, 2016 8:56:04 GMT
I was just checking the consultation site and saw this  I guess 647 will be withdrawn?  Not forgetting the amount of bias changes. |
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Jul 17, 2016 12:33:36 GMT
I was just checking the consultation site and saw this I guess 647 will be withdrawn? Not forgetting the amount of bias changes. The other interesting point is the consultation closing 6/7/16 and the change being implemented 20/7/16 (and yes I know that's referring to the end of the school Summer term). All looks a "done deal" regardless of what submissions they receive. |
|
|
|
Post by john on Jul 17, 2016 21:34:04 GMT
I was just checking the consultation site and saw this I guess 647 will be withdrawn? Not forgetting the amount of bias changes. The other interesting point is the consultation closing 6/7/16 and the change being implemented 20/7/16 (and yes I know that's referring to the end of the school Summer term). All looks a "done deal" regardless of what submissions they receive. There are possible reasons as to why this is happening but all will be revealed in due course. Needless to say it's funding is to be used elsewhere rather than just a cut |
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Aug 3, 2016 13:57:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by john on Aug 3, 2016 22:00:55 GMT
Interesting to note how many people were worried about the effect it would have on the 174. Alot of the drivers at RM were thinking similar but also said how the 647 drivers would try and hold back until a 174 had gone through anyway. Tbh we had all resigned ourselves to the route being cut anyway!!
|
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Sept 12, 2016 15:58:01 GMT
Interesting to note how many people were worried about the effect it would have on the 174. Alot of the drivers at RM were thinking similar but also said how the 647 drivers would try and hold back until a 174 had gone through anyway. Tbh we had all resigned ourselves to the route being cut anyway!! And I see on Londonbusroutes.net that the 174 is getting a new timetable with an extra school time bus in the directons that the 647 ran in. I wonder what the point was given the same level of resource is now being used but probably more fuel being consumed if the bus runs the full length of the 174? What a waste of time and effort. |
|
|
|
Post by john on Sept 12, 2016 16:02:48 GMT
Interesting to note how many people were worried about the effect it would have on the 174. Alot of the drivers at RM were thinking similar but also said how the 647 drivers would try and hold back until a 174 had gone through anyway. Tbh we had all resigned ourselves to the route being cut anyway!! And I see on Londonbusroutes.net that the 174 is getting a new timetable with an extra school time bus in the directons that the 647 ran in. I wonder what the point was given the same level of resource is now being used but probably more fuel being consumed if the bus runs the full length of the 174? What a waste of time and effort. The 174 needs it. It's gained an extra duty with a reformatted rota. Some jobs lengthened and others shortened. Basically, it's not just a school bus from what I know. New rota comes in from the 17th and I'm down to do a couple of duties on there next week so can give my own opinion of it soon |
|
Not forgetting the amount of bias changes.
