|
Post by rugbyref on Jan 25, 2023 16:15:07 GMT
Will Khan bin 5000 responses here as well, if he doesn’t like what they say?
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Jan 25, 2023 16:23:08 GMT
Will Khan bin 5000 responses here as well, if he doesn’t like what they say? Probably
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Jan 25, 2023 17:41:38 GMT
Will Khan bin 5000 responses here as well, if he doesn’t like what they say? No different to what Boris did then. In reality chances are Khan won't read a single one as others are paid to do that.
|
|
|
Post by wirewiper on Jan 25, 2023 17:49:49 GMT
Will Khan bin 5000 responses here as well, if he doesn’t like what they say? No different to what Boris did then. In reality chances are Khan won't read a single one as others are paid to do that. "Please mark your envelope 'For' or 'Against' so we know which ones to open."
|
|
|
Post by southlondon413 on Jan 25, 2023 17:52:50 GMT
Will Khan bin 5000 responses here as well, if he doesn’t like what they say? No different to what Boris did then. In reality chances are Khan won't read a single one as others are paid to do that. Funny because I don’t remember any former mayor deliberately misleading City Hall on the outcome of a consultation or deliberately attempting to alter the results by manipulating them to try and produce a more favourable outcome but y’know…
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Jan 25, 2023 19:34:41 GMT
No different to what Boris did then. In reality chances are Khan won't read a single one as others are paid to do that. Funny because I don’t remember any former mayor deliberately misleading City Hall on the outcome of a consultation or deliberately attempting to alter the results by manipulating them to try and produce a more favourable outcome but y’know… Doesn't matter. If TfL deliberately manipulated a consultation, he is the ultimate boss, so bears ultimate responsibility.
|
|
|
Post by southlondon413 on Jan 25, 2023 19:53:18 GMT
Funny because I don’t remember any former mayor deliberately misleading City Hall on the outcome of a consultation or deliberately attempting to alter the results by manipulating them to try and produce a more favourable outcome but y’know… Doesn't matter. If TfL deliberately manipulated a consultation, he is the ultimate boss, so bears ultimate responsibility. There is clear evidence Khan has manipulated the data from his own office and with his own staffers, there is no evidence to suggest any former mayor has done the same. It doesn’t mean they haven’t of course, but until evidence is produced…
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Jan 25, 2023 19:58:14 GMT
Doesn't matter. If TfL deliberately manipulated a consultation, he is the ultimate boss, so bears ultimate responsibility. There is clear evidence Khan has manipulated the data from his own office and with his own staffers, there is no evidence to suggest any former mayor has done the same. It doesn’t mean they haven’t of course, but until evidence is produced… What consultation and data are we talking about?
|
|
|
Post by southlondon413 on Jan 25, 2023 19:59:30 GMT
There is clear evidence Khan has manipulated the data from his own office and with his own staffers, there is no evidence to suggest any former mayor has done the same. It doesn’t mean they haven’t of course, but until evidence is produced… What consultation and data are we talking about? ULEZ.
|
|
|
Post by capitalomnibus on Jan 26, 2023 11:11:40 GMT
Will Khan bin 5000 responses here as well, if he doesn’t like what they say? it does not matter, it is either his way or no way which ultimately ends up being his way.
|
|
|
Post by capitalomnibus on Jan 26, 2023 11:13:45 GMT
Doesn't matter. If TfL deliberately manipulated a consultation, he is the ultimate boss, so bears ultimate responsibility. There is clear evidence Khan has manipulated the data from his own office and with his own staffers, there is no evidence to suggest any former mayor has done the same. It doesn’t mean they haven’t of course, but until evidence is produced… He would get away with it, politicians almost always do.
|
|
|
Post by southlondon413 on Jan 26, 2023 11:21:30 GMT
There is clear evidence Khan has manipulated the data from his own office and with his own staffers, there is no evidence to suggest any former mayor has done the same. It doesn’t mean they haven’t of course, but until evidence is produced… He would get away with it, politicians almost always do. It’s just a shame there isn’t an impeachment process for the Mayor.
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Jan 26, 2023 16:13:04 GMT
He would get away with it, politicians almost always do. It’s just a shame there isn’t an impeachment process for the Mayor. This is a comparison of how pollution from vehicles has change from 1990, 2003 & 2018 ... 1990 is a base at 100%. Yes, motoring does still pollute, but it has reduced significantly in past 30 years. Were we hearing of people dropping like flies in 1990, why is it such a problem now? Answer, motoring is not the cause of most of the current problems ... but it is easy to bash when they are too frightened to tackle the other causes head on. Oh and our Mayor has recently been spouting the 2003 figures to add a bit of weight to his latest releases, nothing like being 20 years out of date ... 20 years irrelevant. Even in 2003 London was 2516th out of 3226 cities monitored for pollution, better than major cities such as New York & Berlin - worst polluted ranking 1. Lets be honest and say most of those have probably got better since 2018 ... if not, only LTNs can be to blame. The transport industry is tackling its own pollution issue ... politicians by having a motoring policy is just trying to claim credit for the work of the sector ... nothing related to their policies. The current policy is nothing but a FRAUD! They know as the sector moves to zero emissions, these figures will improve, so by bashing the industry, they can then claim their policies resulted in this improvement, when in reality this is not the case ... tackling the other causes is harder and will be even less popular, so rather than tackle difficult issues, they do their best ostrich impression and bury their heads in the sand.
|
|
|
Post by capitalomnibus on Jan 28, 2023 0:09:12 GMT
It’s just a shame there isn’t an impeachment process for the Mayor. This is a comparison of how pollution from vehicles has change from 1990, 2003 & 2018 ... 1990 is a base at 100%. Yes, motoring does still pollute, but it has reduced significantly in past 30 years. Were we hearing of people dropping like flies in 1990, why is it such a problem now? Answer, motoring is not the cause of most of the current problems ... but it is easy to bash when they are too frightened to tackle the other causes head on. Oh and our Mayor has recently been spouting the 2003 figures to add a bit of weight to his latest releases, nothing like being 20 years out of date ... 20 years irrelevant. Even in 2003 London was 2516th out of 3226 cities monitored for pollution, better than major cities such as New York & Berlin - worst polluted ranking 1. Lets be honest and say most of those have probably got better since 2018 ... if not, only LTNs can be to blame. The transport industry is tackling its own pollution issue ... politicians by having a motoring policy is just trying to claim credit for the work of the sector ... nothing related to their policies. The current policy is nothing but a FRAUD! They know as the sector moves to zero emissions, these figures will improve, so by bashing the industry, they can then claim their policies resulted in this improvement, when in reality this is not the case ... tackling the other causes is harder and will be even less popular, so rather than tackle difficult issues, they do their best ostrich impression and bury their heads in the sand. Well said, it is clearly obvious, the motorist is just the easiest target as usual and in the UK there are no real credible motoring organisations that really has the motorist interest or stands up for them. The RAC and AA is a pathetic joke.
|
|
|
Post by dominic on Feb 5, 2023 22:34:58 GMT
I'm gonna predict with the changes of the routes:
Alperton: idrk much about west london bus routes... Brent Cross: well, i'm guessing the night service of 102 extended to Brent Cross, Shopping Centre so it would be the same as the day route. Havering: The merge of 296/396, 396 withdrawn, 296 re-routed via King George Hopsital. Tooting: I'm guessing changes to maybe 333, idk it would be withdrawn or not but let's just see. Wanstead: hmmm, maybe something to do with 66 but not withdrawing it. Wembley: Same As Alperton
|
|