|
Post by rif153 on Aug 26, 2019 10:13:34 GMT
Are the 2 VHs originally ordered for the 681 still arriving? They arrived months ago, and they're allocated to the 65 alongside the VHS initially intended for the 406 Actually that's not true. VH45310-7 were ordered against the 406's contract but diverted to FW for the 65. The two VHs ordered against the 681's contract are yet to enter service, or AFAIK arrive.
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 26, 2019 10:13:48 GMT
There are the current VHs originally ordered for route 406 (now 65) at FW but only from VH45310-17. The other 2 are still nowhere to be seen. (VH45318/9)
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 26, 2019 10:16:46 GMT
Does HH have any space for future wins such as 117, 235, H28 and more. I would like to see them get more routes after the losses of 482, E10 and now 285.
Is the 635 cross-linked with H91 and allocated with VHs?
|
|
|
Post by george on Aug 26, 2019 10:21:16 GMT
Does HH have any space for future wins such as 117, 235, H28 and more. I would like to see them get more routes after the losses of 482, E10 and now 285. Is the 635 cross-linked with H91 and allocated with VHs? I hope if RATP won any of those routes AV would also be considered as well.
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Aug 26, 2019 10:21:43 GMT
When Imber was on last year it took 24 days for LT1000 to enter service again. This year it's not returned since it being at Imber. Wonder why it takes so long for this bus to re-enter service after the event. I have a theory that LT1000 has issues with ibus. It didn't appear on the 23A on LVF, on Imberbus, and it hasn't been logged into ibus since 25th July. If LT1000 were really so troublesome, would RATP really have taken it down to Imber? I think not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2019 10:22:28 GMT
Does HH have any space for future wins such as 117, 235, H28 and more. I would like to see them get more routes after the losses of 482, E10 and now 285. Is the 635 cross-linked with H91 and allocated with VHs? I think if RATP were to win the 117, 235 and H28, I would see them operate from AV instead as AV have plenty of spare due to their route losses, HH could win the 90 in the future as its new contract will be in 2022/2024
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Aug 26, 2019 10:22:51 GMT
When Imber was on last year it took 24 days for LT1000 to enter service again. This year it's not returned since it being at Imber. Wonder why it takes so long for this bus to re-enter service after the event. I have a theory that LT1000 has issues with ibus. It didn't appear on the 23A on LVF, on Imberbus, and it hasn't been logged into ibus since 25th July. If LT1000 were really so troublesome, would RATP really have taken it down to Imber? I think not. I'm pretty sure it did end up at Imber this year.
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Aug 26, 2019 10:23:10 GMT
Does HH have any space for future wins such as 117, 235, H28 and more. I would like to see them get more routes after the losses of 482, E10 and now 285. Is the 635 cross-linked with H91 and allocated with VHs? I hope if RATP won any of those routes AV would also be considered as well. A route I'd love to see AV scoop up is the E8.
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Aug 26, 2019 10:24:39 GMT
I have a theory that LT1000 has issues with ibus. It didn't appear on the 23A on LVF, on Imberbus, and it hasn't been logged into ibus since 25th July. If LT1000 were really so troublesome, would RATP really have taken it down to Imber? I think not. I'm pretty sure it did end up at Imber this year. I'm not disputing it was at Imber, I saw it there. The point I'm trying to make is that if LT1000 were so troublesome, then you would've thought RATP would've taken a different LT to Imber. LT1000 didn't appear on LVF as a 23A either hence why I think it has trouble logging into ibus.
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Aug 26, 2019 10:26:18 GMT
Does HH have any space for future wins such as 117, 235, H28 and more. I would like to see them get more routes after the losses of 482, E10 and now 285. Is the 635 cross-linked with H91 and allocated with VHs? IIRC, the 635 crosslink with the H91 is no more. I believe the 635 now uses the remaining SPs at HH.
|
|
|
Post by LK65EBO on Aug 26, 2019 10:27:41 GMT
The 235, 117 and H28 could also be put into FW as there could be space after the 267 and 391 left/ leaves.
Shepherds Bush could possibly take the 237
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Aug 26, 2019 10:29:53 GMT
The 235, 117 and H28 could also be won by FW as there could be space after the 267 and 391 left/ leaves. Shepherds Bush could possibly take the 237 RATP are spoilt for choice for where to run the 237 from (should they bid for it) HH, AV, V, and S are all contenders. We could even see a split allocation as a clever way of reducing operating costs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2019 10:32:08 GMT
The 235, 117 and H28 could also be won by FW as there could be space after the 267 and 391 left/ leaves. Shepherds Bush could possibly take the 237 I've never imagined a Metroline route pass through 3 RATP garages, as the 237 passes through S, V and AV, but if RATP were to win the 237, it would most likely operate from AV as it would be easier for drivers as AH is just down the road from AV with V and S being a bit further away from the current 237 drivers
|
|
|
Post by george on Aug 26, 2019 10:33:14 GMT
The 235, 117 and H28 could also be won by FW as there could be space after the 267 and 391 left/ leaves. Shepherds Bush could possibly take the 237 RATP are spoilt for choice for where to run the 237 from (should they bid for it) HH, AV, V, and S are all contenders. We could even see a split allocation as a clever way of reducing operating costs. Indeed can't be that many routes that pass as many bus garages than the 237.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2019 10:33:48 GMT
I hope if RATP won any of those routes AV would also be considered as well. A route I'd love to see AV scoop up is the E8. I wouldn't lie, I see the E2 and E8 being awarded to the same operator as those 2 routes are inseparable
|
|