|
Post by southlondon413 on Jun 18, 2024 17:52:25 GMT
S1, S2, S3, S4 share then Sutton Station to Times Square stop. The S2 and S4 don’t share the same stop as the S1 and S3 at Sutton Station in either direction. They do from Grove Road to St Nicholas Centre northbound and from Throwley Way to Sutton Police Station southbound.
|
|
|
Post by greg on Jun 19, 2024 14:17:04 GMT
6, 7 and 8 once upon a time use to share bus stops in Oxford Street as well as the 10 12, 13, 14, 15 in Piccadilly also once upon a time
|
|
|
Post by finchleybuslover on Jun 21, 2024 6:44:52 GMT
the H2 and H3 is Golders Green
|
|
|
Post by PGAT on Jun 24, 2024 13:48:16 GMT
163 and 164 at Wimbledon and Morden
|
|
|
Post by randomy on Jul 8, 2024 11:18:36 GMT
223 and 224 used to be together in Wembley
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Jul 13, 2024 2:15:02 GMT
223 and 224 used to be together in Wembley Uxbridge had routes 222, 223 & 224 before the U routes came in. At least the numbers 223 & 224 have been recycled in broadly the right area of London.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jul 13, 2024 15:54:38 GMT
Eltham is full of these: 160, 161 and 162 (though they don't all stop at the same place), plus even more palindromic routes (132 and 321; 126, 162 and 261).
|
|
|
Post by lundnah on Jul 13, 2024 17:22:42 GMT
Eltham is full of these: 160, 161 and 162 (though they don't all stop at the same place), plus even more palindromic routes (132 and 321; 126, 162 and 261). 132 and 321 are not palindromes. Ditto 126 and 162.
162 and 261 are palindromes
|
|
|
Post by bluepuffy on Jul 13, 2024 17:40:34 GMT
Whilst all three don't meet all together at once, you can get a 196 to Norwood Junction onto onto a 197 and pick up a 198 at East Croydon (If only the 195 was a Croydon route, then we could have had 194-198)
|
|
|
Post by PGAT on Jul 13, 2024 17:52:27 GMT
196 and 197 might be the closest consecutive routes to never meet each other, as they are separated on two sides of the station. Either that or the 2+3 and 249+250 where they share the same road briefly but do not share a bus stop
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Jul 13, 2024 18:26:49 GMT
Eltham is full of these: 160, 161 and 162 (though they don't all stop at the same place), plus even more palindromic routes (132 and 321; 126, 162 and 261). 132 and 321 are not palindromes. Ditto 126 and 162.
162 and 261 are palindromes
Also the 261 doesn’t go to Eltham ! Bromley has the 61, 261, 126, 162
|
|
|
Post by bluepuffy on Jul 13, 2024 21:23:59 GMT
196 and 197 might be the closest consecutive routes to never meet each other, as they are separated on two sides of the station. Either that or the 2+3 and 249+250 where they share the same road briefly but do not share a bus stop Considering the fact that all that separates them is a station, most likely.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Jul 14, 2024 1:14:11 GMT
196 and 197 might be the closest consecutive routes to never meet each other, as they are separated on two sides of the station. Either that or the 2+3 and 249+250 where they share the same road briefly but do not share a bus stop The 249 & 250 share both St Leonard’s Church stops on Streatham High Road The 2 & 3 share several stops between Brixton Station & Morval Road - these are Brixton Station southbound, both St Matthews Estate stops & both Morval Road stops. Years ago, they would also share the Crystal Palace Bus Station stop before the Brixton to Palace journeys were renumbered 432
|
|
|
Post by tbmlondon on Jul 14, 2024 11:10:52 GMT
Eltham is full of these: 160, 161 and 162 (though they don't all stop at the same place), plus even more palindromic routes (132 and 321; 126, 162 and 261). 132/321 and 126/162 are anagrams rather than palindromes.
|
|
|
Post by someone on Jul 14, 2024 16:58:56 GMT
Eltham is full of these: 160, 161 and 162 (though they don't all stop at the same place), plus even more palindromic routes (132 and 321; 126, 162 and 261). 132 and 321 are not palindromes. Ditto 126 and 162.
162 and 261 are palindromes
Sorry, I meant ANAGRAMS.
|
|