Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2020 11:33:24 GMT
Here is the proff of the virus covidiots Herd immunity innit
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Oct 11, 2020 11:38:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by richard on Oct 11, 2020 13:27:30 GMT
This is what's wrong with this country
|
|
|
Post by Pilot on Oct 11, 2020 13:39:58 GMT
I expected nothing less with 10PM curfew, not to mention it affects businesses and these people are on streets instead of inside pubs where at least its a bit more controlled than large crouds in streets.
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Oct 11, 2020 13:57:24 GMT
This is what's wrong with this country Get everything to shut at the same time, what did they think would happen. A staggered approached over the next two hours has to be a better approach. It does not need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out.
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Oct 11, 2020 14:07:26 GMT
This is what's wrong with this country Get everything to shut at the same time, what did they think would happen. A staggered approached over the next two hours has to be a better approach. It does not need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out. I agree though it’s still no excuse to be playing a game of cricket.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2020 14:30:45 GMT
This is what's wrong with this country Get everything to shut at the same time, what did they think would happen. A staggered approached over the next two hours has to be a better approach. It does not need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out. How do you control people who would then move from bar to bar until they were all closed? Either they all close at the same time or none of them do. To be clear I think closing bars, pubs and restaurants does nothing especially when there is clear evidence to suggest that there is little spread from these types of places. Maybe bars and pubs could employ more bouncers to eject people who are not behaving responsibly or staff could add further limits on the amount of alcohol being sold to individuals.
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Oct 11, 2020 14:35:48 GMT
I expected nothing less with 10PM curfew, not to mention it affects businesses and these people are on streets instead of inside pubs where at least its a bit more controlled than large crouds in streets. Close at 11pm and there will be the same scenario one hour later, the only difference will be that people will have consumed more alcohol by then and will be acting even more irresponsibly.
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Oct 11, 2020 14:37:42 GMT
This is what's wrong with this country Get everything to shut at the same time, what did they think would happen. A staggered approached over the next two hours has to be a better approach. It does not need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out. Or how about people use their own common sense and leave at 9 or 9.30 to avoid the mass exodus at 10pm? And as @busenthusiast56 said, people will just move from the pub that closes early to the one still open, doesn't need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out either.
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Oct 11, 2020 14:51:19 GMT
Get everything to shut at the same time, what did they think would happen. A staggered approached over the next two hours has to be a better approach. It does not need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out. How do you control people who would then move from bar to bar until they were all closed? Either they all close at the same time or none of them do. To be clear I think closing bars, pubs and restaurants does nothing especially when there is clear evidence to suggest that there is little spread from these types of places. Maybe bars and pubs could employ more bouncers to eject people who are not behaving responsibly or staff could add further limits on the amount of alcohol being sold to individuals. Did you have this problem before the 10pm curfew? No. The 'Eat Out On Us?' campaign passed off with out event in August, when bars and restaurants were open beyond 10pm. Now Sept/Oct ... issues. Well what else has changed if it is not the stupid 10pm across the board closing time@
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Oct 11, 2020 14:55:11 GMT
I expected nothing less with 10PM curfew, not to mention it affects businesses and these people are on streets instead of inside pubs where at least its a bit more controlled than large crouds in streets. Close at 11pm and there will be the same scenario one hour later, the only difference will be that people will have consumed more alcohol by then and will be acting even more irresponsibly. And what exactly happened in August before the new restrictions where brought in when the government were encouraging you to use the hospitality sector, and were free to pick there own opening hours? Answer not a lot. So this behaviour is a direct result of this hard and fast closing time policy ... End of story. August showed the previous policy worked.
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Oct 11, 2020 14:57:44 GMT
Get everything to shut at the same time, what did they think would happen. A staggered approached over the next two hours has to be a better approach. It does not need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out. Or how about people use their own common sense and leave at 9 or 9.30 to avoid the mass exodus at 10pm? And as @busenthusiast56 said, people will just move from the pub that closes early to the one still open, doesn't need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out either. It does not need a science qualification that if something was not broke in August, and is now in October, something changed to break it. That will be absurd government policy seemingly advised by the mad scientist. Guess what, in August people did what you suggested and staggered their journeys home.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2020 15:00:26 GMT
How do you control people who would then move from bar to bar until they were all closed? Either they all close at the same time or none of them do. To be clear I think closing bars, pubs and restaurants does nothing especially when there is clear evidence to suggest that there is little spread from these types of places. Maybe bars and pubs could employ more bouncers to eject people who are not behaving responsibly or staff could add further limits on the amount of alcohol being sold to individuals. Did you have this problem before the 10pm curfew? No. The 'Eat Out On Us?' campaign passed off with out event in August, when bars and restaurants were open beyond 10pm. Now Sept/Oct ... issues. Well what else has changed if it is not the stupid 10pm across the board closing time@ Staggering closures wouldn’t work either as it would encourage people to go from business to business. Also who would decide in an area who gets to close at 9 and who closes at 11? As I stated above I don’t think closing at 10 does much except encourage more irresponsible behaviour in certain groups but having traveled after midnight on a Saturday night in central London it has very much emptied town when there would normally be thousands milling around so it has in some way done what it was expected to do. It doesn’t mean I agree with it though.
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Oct 11, 2020 15:02:50 GMT
Did you have this problem before the 10pm curfew? No. The 'Eat Out On Us?' campaign passed off with out event in August, when bars and restaurants were open beyond 10pm. Now Sept/Oct ... issues. Well what else has changed if it is not the stupid 10pm across the board closing time@ Staggering closures wouldn’t work either as it would encourage people to go from business to business. Also who would decide in an area who gets to close at 9 and who closes at 11? As I stated above I don’t think closing at 10 does much except encourage more irresponsible behaviour in certain groups but having traveled after midnight on a Saturday night in central London it has very much emptied town when there would normally be thousands milling around so it has in some way done what it was expected to do. It doesn’t mean I agree with it though. Was it a problem in August?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2020 15:03:39 GMT
Get everything to shut at the same time, what did they think would happen. A staggered approached over the next two hours has to be a better approach. It does not need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out. Or how about people use their own common sense and leave at 9 or 9.30 to avoid the mass exodus at 10pm? And as @busenthusiast56 said, people will just move from the pub that closes early to the one still open, doesn't need much of a scientific qualification to work that one out either. Neither does it need much common sense to limit going socialising and before I get moaned out I mean not week in week out night after night. Any way all these people will probably be in for a shock next week when we find out pubs will have further restrictions. Sadly all that will happen is the infection rates will drop but as soon as pubs open again we will be back to square one. I went to Tesco today and social distancing is a thing of the past! I honestly wonder what the shops will be like at Christmas!
|
|