|
|
Post by mb171 on Apr 2, 2020 13:16:07 GMT
53 and 159 at Lambeth North
|
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Apr 2, 2020 13:28:52 GMT
The 7 and 70 run parallel between East Acton and St Charles' Square
|
|
|
|
Post by wirewiper on Apr 2, 2020 15:08:48 GMT
The 8 passes directly over the 40 at Holborn Viaduct, and meets the 56 nearby at St Paul's/Newgate Street and the 168 at Holborn Station.
Think someone has already mentioned it, but the 9, whilst it doesn't meet the 18 it does meet the 27 and 36.
|
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Apr 2, 2020 15:21:55 GMT
The 8 passes directly over the 40 at Holborn Viaduct, and meets the 56 nearby at St Paul's/Newgate Street and the 168 at Holborn Station. Think someone has already mentioned it, but the 9, whilst it doesn't meet the 18 it does meet the 27 and 36. The 8 also meets the 344 and 488, passes within shouting distance of the 24, stands pretty close to the 176 and used to meet the 48..... |
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Apr 2, 2020 15:30:09 GMT
The 4 and 56 run parallel between St Pauls and Angel The 4 meets the 8 (st Paul’s), 40 (just about at Blackfriars!), 56, 76 (st Paul’s), 100 (st Paul’s), 236 (Finsbury park) and 476 (angel) |
|
|
|
Post by busaholic on Apr 2, 2020 15:36:27 GMT
The 8 passes directly over the 40 at Holborn Viaduct, and meets the 56 nearby at St Paul's/Newgate Street and the 168 at Holborn Station. Think someone has already mentioned it, but the 9, whilst it doesn't meet the 18 it does meet the 27 and 36. I missed this before, but the old 9 would, in the course of a journey from Hammersmith to Ludgate Circus have passed the 18 (at L.D.), 27,36,45,63 and 72, so only 54 missing. An N9 would add 81 to that list too! |
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Apr 2, 2020 16:01:20 GMT
The 8 passes directly over the 40 at Holborn Viaduct, and meets the 56 nearby at St Paul's/Newgate Street and the 168 at Holborn Station. Think someone has already mentioned it, but the 9, whilst it doesn't meet the 18 it does meet the 27 and 36. The 9 also meets the 72 at Hammersmith |
|
|
|
Post by John tuthill on Apr 2, 2020 16:04:37 GMT
The 8 passes directly over the 40 at Holborn Viaduct, and meets the 56 nearby at St Paul's/Newgate Street and the 168 at Holborn Station. Think someone has already mentioned it, but the 9, whilst it doesn't meet the 18 it does meet the 27 and 36. I missed this before, but the old 9 would, in the course of a journey from Hammersmith to Ludgate Circus have passed the 18 (at L.D.), 27,36,45,63 and 72, so only 54 missing. An N9 would add 81 to that list too! L.D.? |
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Apr 2, 2020 16:25:15 GMT
This thread is addictive!
The 13 meets the 52, 221, 260, 390 and 507
The 23 meets the 46, 391 and 414
|
|
|
|
Post by greg on Apr 2, 2020 19:29:23 GMT
18 and 36 between Paddington and Harrow Road
|
|
|
|
Post by DE20106 on Apr 2, 2020 20:20:18 GMT
Interestingly enough I noticed a few months ago that the 115 and 330 share quite a large parallel section, and thought ‘oh that’s interesting a route number that is twice the other’ (ie 330 is double 115) and have never batted an eyelid to it until now when I went to post about it....
From someone who got an A* in their maths A-level ..... 🤦🏻♂️
|
|
|
|
Post by DE20106 on Apr 2, 2020 20:21:34 GMT
How has no one mentioned the similarities of the 16 and 32 yet!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Apr 2, 2020 21:08:51 GMT
How has no one mentioned the similarities of the 16 and 32 yet!! It's quite funny as both routes have led to a spin off 316 and 332, although those aren't multiples so better leave that one there  |
|
|
|
Post by DE20106 on Apr 2, 2020 21:22:24 GMT
How has no one mentioned the similarities of the 16 and 32 yet!! It's quite funny as both routes have led to a spin off 316 and 332, although those aren't multiples so better leave that one there Although being very pedantic while the 316 is a spin off of the 16, the 332 isn’t a spin off of the 32  those two routes actually stemmed from the 16 alone  the 332 confusingly comes from the 316 which obviously stemmed from the 16 lol, weird how it came about about. Not entirely sure why the 316 was introduced just for the Cricklewood to Neasden section to be replaced by yet another route just ten years later but there you go lol |
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Apr 2, 2020 22:08:48 GMT
This thread, the different side of the Road but same destination thread and the double passing thread makes you realise how much the bus network has changed within the last 16 years.
|
|
those two routes actually stemmed from the 16 alone 
the 332 confusingly comes from the 316 which obviously stemmed from the 16 lol, weird how it came about about.