|
Post by northlondon83 on Sept 27, 2023 15:06:20 GMT
Yes it does, although only temporary. Maybe I should have been clearer. It now uses the Lower Lea Crossing, Leamouth Road and the A13 between Silvertown and Canning Town whilst Silvertown Way is closed This is ridiculous, I think it was self explanatory that diversions weren't included in this. Unfortunately I disagree. It still counts even though it's temporary. No idea why people bother commenting/arguing on such a ridiculous and trivial issue
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Sept 27, 2023 15:15:54 GMT
This is ridiculous, I think it was self explanatory that diversions weren't included in this. Unfortunately I disagree. It still counts even though it's temporary. No idea why people bother commenting/arguing on such a ridiculous and trivial issue Sorry you are joking right? Especially considering how petty your post was in the first place regarding the 330. You seem to have came back here with the sole intention of being as awkward as possible.
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Sept 27, 2023 15:18:28 GMT
Unfortunately I disagree. It still counts even though it's temporary. No idea why people bother commenting/arguing on such a ridiculous and trivial issue Sorry you are joking right? Especially considering how petty your post was in the first place regarding the 330. You seem to have came back here with the sole intention of being as awkward as possible. No I'm not. The 330 still counts even though it's temporary. It is not against the criteria of this thread in my opinion. Regarding your second point I have controversial opinions about stuff however I am free to express them. I don't believe that it is awkward at all
|
|
|
Post by B9TL205 on Sept 27, 2023 16:03:38 GMT
Sorry you are joking right? Especially considering how petty your post was in the first place regarding the 330. You seem to have came back here with the sole intention of being as awkward as possible. No I'm not. The 330 still counts even though it's temporary. It is not against the criteria of this thread in my opinion. Regarding your second point I have controversial opinions about stuff however I am free to express them. I don't believe that it is awkward at all I really don't think that was the point of the thread.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Sept 27, 2023 16:51:11 GMT
No I'm not. The 330 still counts even though it's temporary. It is not against the criteria of this thread in my opinion. Regarding your second point I have controversial opinions about stuff however I am free to express them. I don't believe that it is awkward at all I really don't think that was the point of the thread. Exactly there are probably countless routes on diversion into other boroughs. I bet he won't come back to this thread in November to remove those posts when the route is back to normal.
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Sept 27, 2023 20:13:34 GMT
I really don't think that was the point of the thread. Exactly there are probably countless routes on diversion into other boroughs. I bet he won't come back to this thread in November to remove those posts when the route is back to normal.
Why on earth would I need to remove the posts? By then I wouldn't be bothered about something I posted two months ago and it's a very trivial thing to get worked up about.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Sept 27, 2023 21:23:20 GMT
Exactly there are probably countless routes on diversion into other boroughs. I bet he won't come back to this thread in November to remove those posts when the route is back to normal.
Why on earth would I need to remove the posts? By then I wouldn't be bothered about something I posted two months ago and it's a very trivial thing to get worked up about. My final reply on this! You call this trivial when you made the initial post about the 330 which was extremely trivial and totally out of context for what the thread idea is about. You know very well you was trying to be smart and as I said in my reply other there is probably loads of other examples of routes on diversion like the 330. As for removing the post well yes it probably would need to be removed as it would factually be incorrect when the route is no longer on diversion.
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Sept 28, 2023 0:50:45 GMT
Someone tell me where did it say permanent routes only?
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Sept 28, 2023 7:01:00 GMT
Someone tell me where did it say permanent routes only? Would have thought that would be common sense.
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Sept 28, 2023 7:03:12 GMT
Someone tell me where did it say permanent routes only? Would have thought that would be common sense. It is not in my opinion
|
|
|
Post by lundnah on Sept 28, 2023 7:26:39 GMT
London also has three single-borough rail routes... - Stratford International to Beckton - West Ealing to Greenford - Romford to Upminster
...and one single borough tram route - West Croydon to New Addington
|
|
|
Post by DT 11 on Sept 28, 2023 8:03:31 GMT
Would have thought that would be common sense. It is not in my opinion Routes on diversion is not permanent, you love to try to bend the rules. Although the thread does not specifically mention it. Mentioning routes on diversion is spam on this thread, there is a thread for “Buses on diversion” because it is temporary and the route will go back to normal. Clearly you are just upping post count… as you in general find something to complain about. I look forward to when the next tenders come out with 1 or 2 routes released retained … you will complain again about it, so pathetic
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Sept 28, 2023 10:52:42 GMT
Routes on diversion is not permanent, you love to try to bend the rules. Although the thread does not specifically mention it. Mentioning routes on diversion is spam on this thread, there is a thread for “Buses on diversion” because it is temporary and the route will go back to normal. Clearly you are just upping post count… as you in general find something to complain about. I look forward to when the next tenders come out with 1 or 2 routes released retained … you will complain again about it, so pathetic You do love to point score don't you. Rather than post that ridiculous reply you could have posted something less harsh. It is not spam and you literally said that the thread doesn't mention diverted routes. Not sure why so many people are getting worked up about a silly issue
|
|
|
Post by DT 11 on Sept 28, 2023 11:52:57 GMT
Routes on diversion is not permanent, you love to try to bend the rules. Although the thread does not specifically mention it. Mentioning routes on diversion is spam on this thread, there is a thread for “Buses on diversion” because it is temporary and the route will go back to normal. Clearly you are just upping post count… as you in general find something to complain about. I look forward to when the next tenders come out with 1 or 2 routes released retained … you will complain again about it, so pathetic You do love to point score don't you. Rather than post that ridiculous reply you could have posted something less harsh. It is not spam and you literally said that the thread doesn't mention diverted routes. Not sure why so many people are getting worked up about a silly issue Well overall what else is there to say… Less harsh? Common sense applies… Think before you post. You are arguing with East London members who know the area very well boomerang, back and forth. There is a specific thread for buses on diversion which has over 170 pages of discussion. It is most certainly spam because you as usual have created an argument and when you are told by well established members, you do not want to hear it before posting stuff in threads read some of the posts first to get an idea what the thread is about… Something like this happened a few years ago “Strange Turns & Odd Observations” thread was renamed, “Turns & Observations”. Cannot remember the reason why but it made sense. Overall it does not take a genius to workout what this thread is for the thread has 9 pages of posts in relation to the subject with 1 person attempting to create their own agenda… it may as well become a Disney Alice in Wonderland thread if Diversions are now to be part of it…
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Sept 28, 2023 12:59:39 GMT
Back on topic guys
The 129 will, over the course of a few years, go from being a single-borough, shortest route length DD route - to a 3-borough, cross-river linking route, one of the few routes using a tunnel, eastern most reaching cross river route. What a change
This leaves the 335 as the only route staying within Greenwich. Funnily operated by a garage not even in London
|
|