|
Post by vjaska on Feb 25, 2015 0:40:34 GMT
I had a feeling that reason would be mentioned. The problem is though that the Portland Road area now has no direct link to the 196 whereas the 130 terminated with the 196 providing the link and extending it via South Norwood Hill would of retained the link. Furthermore, they've allowed the extension to go ahead without having a plan for match days at Selhurst Park which I find very strange. There is still a direct link between the 130 and the 196, buses towards Thornton Heath still serve the Grosvenor Road stop at Norwood Junction Oh, good that they retained that. Thanks for clarifying that.
|
|
|
Post by sid on Feb 25, 2015 11:12:18 GMT
I don't see the logic in that claim at all and the 130 still serving Grosvenor Road is likely to delay it at certain times, it's not an ideal road for buses.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2015 16:55:57 GMT
I agree with you guys on this and also the fact that Park Road is not far from Selhurst Road and Whitehorse Lane so their claim seems a rather bit pointless the only reason why I think they could of done it that way was because it was cheaper.
|
|