|
Post by lundnah on Dec 17, 2019 9:01:15 GMT
All the helpful information about the multiple new bus routes in west London has been removed, along with links to maps and details of associated changes.
Ten days on, passengers are expected to fend for themselves.
The only changes listed on the page now are frequency changes and additional buses for one-off engineering works.
Frequency increase: 92, 394, E6, W19
Frequency decrease: 280, W16
More buses on Boxing Day: 155
More buses on Dec 29th/30th: 25, 238
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2019 10:12:54 GMT
All the helpful information about the multiple new bus routes in west London has been removed, along with links to maps and details of associated changes.
Ten days on, passengers are expected to fend for themselves.
The only changes listed on the page now are frequency changes and additional buses for one-off engineering works.
Frequency increase: 92, 394, E6, W19
Frequency decrease: 280, W16
More buses on Boxing Day: 155
More buses on Dec 29th/30th: 25, 238
It already has been mentioned on here
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Dec 17, 2019 10:47:02 GMT
All the helpful information about the multiple new bus routes in west London has been removed, along with links to maps and details of associated changes. Ten days on, passengers are expected to fend for themselves. The only changes listed on the page now are frequency changes and additional buses for one-off engineering works.
Frequency increase: 92, 394, E6, W19
Frequency decrease: 280, W16 More buses on Boxing Day: 155
More buses on Dec 29th/30th: 25, 238
It already has been mentioned on here That's not the point lundnah is making - when your a transport provider, maps, timetables, especially for new routes, at the very least should be made available in multiple formats for passengers to get hold off and TfL have failed on both instances. If your not an enthusiast like us on this forum, you would subsequently struggle to get the information you seek which puts people off from using that mode of transport
|
|
|
Post by southlondonbus on Dec 17, 2019 11:19:52 GMT
Even a handful of leaflets in Hammersmith bus station for the 218/266/306/391 and N266 changes would have been useful.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2019 11:21:30 GMT
It already has been mentioned on here That's not the point lundnah is making - when your a transport provider, maps, timetables, especially for new routes, at the very least should be made available in multiple formats for passengers to get hold off and TfL have failed on both instances. If your not an enthusiast like us on this forum, you would subsequently struggle to get the information you seek which puts people off from using that mode of transport Oh sorry my bad, I got it mixed up
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2019 21:04:31 GMT
All the helpful information about the multiple new bus routes in west London has been removed, along with links to maps and details of associated changes.
Ten days on, passengers are expected to fend for themselves.
The only changes listed on the page now are frequency changes and additional buses for one-off engineering works.
Frequency increase: 92, 394, E6, W19
Frequency decrease: 280, W16
More buses on Boxing Day: 155
More buses on Dec 29th/30th: 25, 238
Wow removed so fast? And yet I still find posters detailing the 303/305 changes in Edgware at every stop...more than a year on... goodness me!
|
|
|
Post by rif153 on Dec 17, 2019 23:31:16 GMT
Even a handful of leaflets in Hammersmith bus station for the 218/266/306/391 and N266 changes would have been useful. I agree, very poor of TfL not to produce leaflets for the Hammersmith area changes, when they did for the changes in Hayes, Harrow, Ruislip etc.
|
|
|
Post by WSD3 on Dec 25, 2019 17:50:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by galwhv69 on Dec 25, 2019 23:20:59 GMT
They are putting in so little effort into this. It is a temporary change not a perm change and webpage has multiple formatting errors and even includes "Test". Like, come on TfL! Also, thanks for sharing
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2019 14:44:01 GMT
Regarding the 112 proposed extension to North Finchley, if the changes to the 112/611 go ahead as proposed, I can potentially see these changes happening in July because according to the Bishop Douglass website, the school term ends on the 17th July which is a Friday, so these changes could possibly happen on the 18th July? and also TFL wouldn't want to withdraw the 611 during the midway point of the school year. In my opinion, as I driven the 112 a couple times especially during peak hours, I don't see there being many concerns on the 112 other than the reliability and traffic hotspots it goes through, which could be the downfall to these changes not happening
|
|
|
Post by londonboy71 on Dec 30, 2019 19:14:44 GMT
No 120 or E7 this New Years Eve night. Anyone know why?
|
|
|
Post by abellion on Dec 30, 2019 20:12:43 GMT
No 120 or E7 this New Years Eve night. Anyone know why? Perhaps a problem with drivers or just cuts to save money
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2019 20:47:22 GMT
No 120 or E7 this New Years Eve night. Anyone know why? Perhaps a problem with drivers or just cuts to save money There seems no logic anymore in what runs. RATP have pulled the plug totally, after having run the 216 and enhanced frequencies on other existing night routes like the 111 and 281. As a result, there is a gaping void in SW London of extra night services.Over in SE London the 96 used to run, and the 269. I would be interested to know what the discussions are around this between TfL and the operators. In RATP I get the impression they will not do anything over and above.
|
|
|
Post by snowman on Dec 30, 2019 21:26:26 GMT
Perhaps a problem with drivers or just cuts to save money There seems no logic anymore in what runs. RATP have pulled the plug totally, after having run the 216 and enhanced frequencies on other existing night routes like the 111 and 281. As a result, there is a gaping void in SW London of extra night services.Over in SE London the 96 used to run, and the 269. I would be interested to know what the discussions are around this between TfL and the operators. In RATP I get the impression they will not do anything over and above. Looks like cost cutting, a few routes get a 20 minute instead of 30 minutes service, many are curtailed tfl.gov.uk/modes/buses/permanent-bus-changes#on-this-page-1I suppose being a Tuesday night / Wednesday morning, not a lot of enthusiasm for running extra buses unless they are paid loads. I guess RATP came up with a price, TFL decided didn’t want extra buses at that price so no extras for RATP Maybe it is because New Years Day has a Sunday service (which tends to be very light until about 10am), so wasn’t worth having difficult rota, where staff may struggle to get home.
|
|
|
Post by localet44 on Dec 30, 2019 22:21:01 GMT
Are there any plans to return the 126 to Bromley South instead of terminating in the High Street? New bus stop markings have been placed on the road at the old terminal in Simpson's Road [under the Vue Cinema]
|
|