|
Post by 10121ddo on Sept 4, 2019 12:27:52 GMT
I remember first working out the significance of running numbers when as a child it dawned on me the same buses worked in a cycle all day on my old local route the 270 in Hampton. Being OCD I examined the timetables of all the FW routes then and mapped out when the buses left and returned to the garage. The only route I never got to grips with was the cursed 33 as the numbers didn't run in sequence due to half service terminating at Hammersmith. No use if you spotted a certain favourite bus going past and wanted to plan to intercept it somewhere later on. For those aged under 20 , this was what life was like pre LVF !! Sad that still remember FW 132 was last bus out MonFri & 133 on Saturdays. Not 100% related, but I still remember seeing DX 1 - 10 on the 275 pre-2012, and noticing the allocation being the VLW105-116 set. Hadn't the faintest clue that the VLWs were to be replaced by the then very common Trident. But then, when the E400s arrived, my number OCD was more than satisfied as running numbers were T201-212 (then 213 was added), and the fleets were 10113-10123. The crossover of the fleet numbers 113-116 being used by both DX and T seemed very uncanny, given my favourite number growing up was 113.... and that I could continue catching it on my daily schools journeys.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on May 4, 2020 14:48:12 GMT
LK65EBO WSD3 This is getting silly now. Every other thread this is happening Take this as a final warning. Multiple posts are being report and we will issue bans. We're not going to loose valued members of this forum over petty arguments.
|
|