|
Post by Buses678 on Sept 2, 2023 21:22:09 GMT
š omg they are getting worse someone has posted a picture on Facebook of a knocked down camera after they sown it in half. The irony nowadays, aint suprised
|
|
|
Post by SILENCED on Sept 2, 2023 21:28:40 GMT
It is to show their frustration Normally I wouldnāt condone this sort of behaviour but when the mayor refuses to listen, goes for sham consultations and ignores all views / votes opposed to his, dismisses anyone opposing him as a right wing racist nut (and his supporters on this forum also tar people accordingly!) what choice does one have At least itās more justified than those morons at JSO for which millions of pounds of taxpayers money is being spent for police to stand meekly gawking The worst one is suppressing evidence that shows how ineffective ULEZs are. If it was a national government minister doing this there would be crys for him resign. The report that said the previous ULEZ had produce negligible reduction in ait pollution, 3%, and something that would have naturally reduced by other measures, ie newer cars. But it was quickly suppressed and the authors at Imperial, made to rebute it and offer revised paper showing far greater reductions. He pays Imperial a lot of money for their sham reports, so of course they are going to change it. They want to continue to receive your tax pounds, and lots of them, Ā£800k in two years. Then wonder why there no money for anything in the UK. Public bodies are so wasteful. I look at Croydon, and when the average council is well over Ā£1000pa, and 150,000 homes in the borough, that is if my calculations are correct more than Ā£150m. Then add central grants and all the other sources of income, how incompetent were councillors that made us bankrupt. Where does it all go? I know they now have to pay Ā£47m a year in interest, but how did we get there? Years, probably decades of incompetence
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Sept 2, 2023 21:45:14 GMT
Normally I wouldnāt condone this sort of behaviour but when the mayor refuses to listen, goes for sham consultations and ignores all views / votes opposed to his, dismisses anyone opposing him as a right wing racist nut (and his supporters on this forum also tar people accordingly!) what choice does one have At least itās more justified than those morons at JSO for which millions of pounds of taxpayers money is being spent for police to stand meekly gawking I look at Croydon, and when the average council is well over Ā£1000pa, and 150,000 homes in the borough, that is if my calculations are correct more than Ā£150m. Then add central grants and all the other sources of income, how incompetent were councillors that made us bankrupt. Where does it all go? I know they now have to pay Ā£47m a year in interest, but how did we get there? Years, probably decades of incompetence 'Brick by Brick' apparently is where a lot of it went, they made Lambeth look like geniuses in comparison and believe me, they really ain't!
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Sept 2, 2023 21:45:50 GMT
Normally I wouldnāt condone this sort of behaviour but when the mayor refuses to listen, goes for sham consultations and ignores all views / votes opposed to his, dismisses anyone opposing him as a right wing racist nut (and his supporters on this forum also tar people accordingly!) what choice does one have At least itās more justified than those morons at JSO for which millions of pounds of taxpayers money is being spent for police to stand meekly gawking The worst one is suppressing evidence that shows how ineffective ULEZs are. If it was a national government minister doing this there would be crys for him resign. The report that said the previous ULEZ had produce negligible reduction in ait pollution, 3%, and something that would have naturally reduced by other measures, ie newer cars. But it was quickly suppressed and the authors at Imperial, made to rebute it and offer revised paper showing far greater reductions. He pays Imperial a lot of money for their sham reports, so of course they are going to change it. They want to continue to receive your tax pounds, and lots of them, Ā£800k in two years. Then wonder why there no money for anything in the UK. Public bodies are so wasteful. I look at Croydon, and when the average council is well over Ā£1000pa, and 150,000 homes in the borough, that is if my calculations are correct more than Ā£150m. Then add central grants and all the other sources of income, how incompetent were councillors that made us bankrupt. Where does it all go? I know they now have to pay Ā£47m a year in interest, but how did we get there? Years, probably decades of incompetenceĀ Indeed On a separate note I am quite surprised about how few people know that the Blackwall tunnel will also get tolled from next year. I asked a bunch of acquaintances in Greenwich (Borough). Of the 10 people I asked, none of them know of this although most were aware of the Silvertown tunnel being tolled
|
|
|
Post by MKAY315 on Sept 3, 2023 13:06:21 GMT
The worst one is suppressing evidence that shows how ineffective ULEZs are. If it was a national government minister doing this there would be crys for him resign. The report that said the previous ULEZ had produce negligible reduction in ait pollution, 3%, and something that would have naturally reduced by other measures, ie newer cars. But it was quickly suppressed and the authors at Imperial, made to rebute it and offer revised paper showing far greater reductions. He pays Imperial a lot of money for their sham reports, so of course they are going to change it. They want to continue to receive your tax pounds, and lots of them, Ā£800k in two years. Then wonder why there no money for anything in the UK. Public bodies are so wasteful. I look at Croydon, and when the average council is well over Ā£1000pa, and 150,000 homes in the borough, that is if my calculations are correct more than Ā£150m. Then add central grants and all the other sources of income, how incompetent were councillors that made us bankrupt. Where does it all go? I know they now have to pay Ā£47m a year in interest, but how did we get there? Years, probably decades of incompetenceĀ Indeed On a separate note I am quite surprised about how few people know that the Blackwall tunnel will also get tolled from next year. I asked a bunch of acquaintances in Greenwich (Borough). Of the 10 people I asked, none of them know of this although most were aware of the Silvertown tunnel being tolled This is something that myself and other people on here have highlighted time and time again. We as a transport enthusiast community are well clued up about this and when we warn people they don't believe us until it happens in live time and then have the cheek to ask why didn't people tell them. ERM HELLO!!!!! It's been said but unfortunately people don't pay attention.
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Sept 3, 2023 14:03:15 GMT
The worst one is suppressing evidence that shows how ineffective ULEZs are. If it was a national government minister doing this there would be crys for him resign. The report that said the previous ULEZ had produce negligible reduction in ait pollution, 3%, and something that would have naturally reduced by other measures, ie newer cars. But it was quickly suppressed and the authors at Imperial, made to rebute it and offer revised paper showing far greater reductions. He pays Imperial a lot of money for their sham reports, so of course they are going to change it. They want to continue to receive your tax pounds, and lots of them, Ā£800k in two years. Then wonder why there no money for anything in the UK. Public bodies are so wasteful. I look at Croydon, and when the average council is well over Ā£1000pa, and 150,000 homes in the borough, that is if my calculations are correct more than Ā£150m. Then add central grants and all the other sources of income, how incompetent were councillors that made us bankrupt. Where does it all go? I know they now have to pay Ā£47m a year in interest, but how did we get there? Years, probably decades of incompetenceĀ Indeed On a separate note I am quite surprised about how few people know that the Blackwall tunnel will also get tolled from next year. I asked a bunch of acquaintances in Greenwich (Borough). Of the 10 people I asked, none of them know of this although most were aware of the Silvertown tunnel being tolled It seems quite a lot of people don't know and no doubt there will be uproar about it when the masses find out, in fact I probably wouldn't know myself if I hadn't read it on here.
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on Sept 3, 2023 14:41:38 GMT
Conservatives out in force today in Romford campaigning for Susan Hall. They are handing out leaflets saying they will scrap ULEZ from day one if she becomes Mayor.
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Sept 3, 2023 15:47:41 GMT
Conservatives out in force today in Romford campaigning for Susan Hall. They are handing out leaflets saying they will scrap ULEZ from day one if she becomes Mayor. The small matter of innocent until proven guilty?
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on Sept 3, 2023 15:48:15 GMT
The small matter of innocent until proven guilty? And we all know what you'd be saying if it was Sadiq.
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Sept 3, 2023 15:49:45 GMT
The small matter of innocent until proven guilty? And we all know what you'd be saying if it was Sadiq. I'd be saying innocent until proven guilty whoever it was.
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Sept 3, 2023 17:31:25 GMT
Conservatives out in force today in Romford campaigning for Susan Hall. They are handing out leaflets saying they will scrap ULEZ from day one if she becomes Mayor. It comes as no surprise. The Tories were best mates with Jimmy Savile in the 80s. Thatcher especially
|
|
|
Post by Eastlondoner62 on Sept 3, 2023 18:13:37 GMT
The small matter of innocent until proven guilty? Really? You weren't taking the moral high ground previously. It wasn't a parking ticket offence though since he pretty much misled the Commons over that. Starmer was found not guilty whether you like it or not. No Keir Starmer was not found not guilty!
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on Sept 3, 2023 18:14:17 GMT
The small matter of innocent until proven guilty? Really? You weren't taking the moral high ground previously. No Keir Starmer was not found not guilty! Mic drop.
|
|
|
Post by greenboy on Sept 3, 2023 18:15:45 GMT
The small matter of innocent until proven guilty? Really? You weren't taking the moral high ground previously. No Keir Starmer was not found not guilty! What? Innocent until proven guilty applies to everyone.
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on Sept 3, 2023 18:17:06 GMT
Really? You weren't taking the moral high ground previously. What? Innocent until proven guilty applies to everyone. Except Keir Starmer was cleared, yet you claim he wasn't found not guilty. Standard issue Tory hypocrisy.
|
|