|
|
Post by Volvo on May 3, 2011 14:28:23 GMT
Those goals that were given to chelsea are quite shocking. As for man utd they do f*** around alot when it comes to the end of a season, teams they should be beating they draw or lose to them. I mean thye should have beaten newcastle for starters and for arsenal I don't know what they were doing, all I can say is my team need to do what they did to chelsea in the champ league and beat them again at O.T and then I can say the title may go our way, or even a draw. If chelsea win then its all over for my team.
|
|
|
|
Post by john on May 3, 2011 17:05:28 GMT
I wanted Man Utd to beat us so they could be one step towards gaining the title. I was annoyed we won as it's too little, too late for us to mount a challenge. Of course it's mathematically possible but relisticly, it's pretty much impossible. Also, I feel sorry for Tottenham (shock horror) as they were cheated out of the match against Chelski and they missed out on Champions League qualification. I would prefer to watch them than Man City as they play much better football. Man City would pull off a better match then Tottenham they have more star, experienced players.. I would like to see how far Man City would go in the Champions League next year... I mean it wasn't that much of a game against Real Madrid was it.. More like Men vs Boys... Really?  Did you see Man City in the Europa League this year??? Compared to us in the Champions League??? Really??? Really??? As for the Madrid game, I don't think the mighty Arsenal would have done much better with playing 80 minutes as 10 v 11 (sorry vjaska, I appreciate your comments about us and Chelsea, takes guts to do that, I know ;D) and a ref that seemed hell bent on making it a one way game from the off. The return at WHL was a different outcome, only 1-0 and that was because of a monkey of a goalkeeper between the sticks!! So Man City better.......really? ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2011 0:50:43 GMT
Man City would pull off a better match then Tottenham they have more star, experienced players.. I would like to see how far Man City would go in the Champions League next year... I mean it wasn't that much of a game against Real Madrid was it.. More like Men vs Boys... Really? Did you see Man City in the Europa League this year??? Compared to us in the Champions League??? Really??? Really??? As for the Madrid game, I don't think the mighty Arsenal would have done much better with playing 80 minutes as 10 v 11 (sorry vjaska, I appreciate your comments about us and Chelsea, takes guts to do that, I know ;D) and a ref that seemed hell bent on making it a one way game from the off. The return at WHL was a different outcome, only 1-0 and that was because of a monkey of a goalkeeper between the sticks!! So Man City better.......really? ? Yes, Man City are better. Because there higher in the League at 4th and will finish 4th, thus Tottenham had a chance of staying in the top 5. Though, Tottenham do have a fair good strikers... Robbie Keane I can vouch for he's quite good, don't understand why he went on loan to West Ham, Jermain Defoe, which he also does do well when he is playing for England also scores a few bangers. But in fair do, Tottenham did manage to go as a far to the Quatar-Finals.. Which is quite an achievement. |
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on May 4, 2011 2:04:06 GMT
Really? Did you see Man City in the Europa League this year??? Compared to us in the Champions League??? Really??? Really??? As for the Madrid game, I don't think the mighty Arsenal would have done much better with playing 80 minutes as 10 v 11 (sorry vjaska, I appreciate your comments about us and Chelsea, takes guts to do that, I know ;D) and a ref that seemed hell bent on making it a one way game from the off. The return at WHL was a different outcome, only 1-0 and that was because of a monkey of a goalkeeper between the sticks!! So Man City better.......really? ? Yes, Man City are better. Because there higher in the League at 4th and will finish 4th, thus Tottenham had a chance of staying in the top 5. Though, Tottenham do have a fair good strikers... Robbie Keane I can vouch for he's quite good, don't understand why he went on loan to West Ham, Jermain Defoe, which he also does do well when he is playing for England also scores a few bangers. But in fair do, Tottenham did manage to go as a far to the Quatar-Finals.. Which is quite an achievement. Tottenham are better because they haven't got a sugar daddy to bank roll them to the Champions League last year and then to finish 5th this year. They are one of only two teams that would be able to qualify for the Champions League if UEFA brought in the financial rules today (other team is Arsenal). They play much better football than City who are nearly as bad as Chelski to watch. They have more strength in depth than City, I mean look at their midfield for a start. The problem with Tottenham is the strikers haven't been firing and they've been relying on Van Der Vaart too often. John, fully agree with us not doing much better if we had 10 men, probably would of turned out the same. It's not often I praise Tottenham so lap it up while you can ;D Note to self: only watch Man United and Arsenal in next years Champions League unless I want to have a nap ;D |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2011 15:57:00 GMT
Sorry to bump this up but the football season has started. With Arsenal start to the season.
Already have sold two key already left the team. Fabregas to Barcelona and Narsi to Man City.
|
|
|
|
Post by smiler52 on Aug 28, 2011 17:03:09 GMT
oh my god Arsenal u lost 8-2 to manutd i dont like both teams but i like Arsenal better than manu
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2011 17:48:54 GMT
Oh dear Arsenal. Oh dear. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by ServerKing on Aug 28, 2011 20:14:31 GMT
Yes, Man City are better. Because there higher in the League at 4th and will finish 4th, thus Tottenham had a chance of staying in the top 5. Though, Tottenham do have a fair good strikers... Robbie Keane I can vouch for he's quite good, don't understand why he went on loan to West Ham, Jermain Defoe, which he also does do well when he is playing for England also scores a few bangers. But in fair do, Tottenham did manage to go as a far to the Quatar-Finals.. Which is quite an achievement. Tottenham are better because they haven't got a sugar daddy to bank roll them to the Champions League last year and then to finish 5th this year. They are one of only two teams that would be able to qualify for the Champions League if UEFA brought in the financial rules today (other team is Arsenal). They play much better football than City who are nearly as bad as Chelski to watch. They have more strength in depth than City, I mean look at their midfield for a start. The problem with Tottenham is the strikers haven't been firing and they've been relying on Van Der Vaart too often. John, fully agree with us not doing much better if we had 10 men, probably would of turned out the same. It's not often I praise Tottenham so lap it up while you can ;D Note to self: only watch Man United and Arsenal in next years Champions League unless I want to have a nap ;D Not happy Spurs lost 5-1 to Man City today.... I guess we'll see how Parker and Adebayor do in the next game... I do wish Spurs will give up with this Stratford thing... it's getting tiring, unless it's a ruse to extract more money out of Haringey Council... even Boris wants to throw £80m at them to stay...  But 8-2..... oh dear ;D |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2011 20:19:34 GMT
Tottenham are better because they haven't got a sugar daddy to bank roll them to the Champions League last year and then to finish 5th this year. They are one of only two teams that would be able to qualify for the Champions League if UEFA brought in the financial rules today (other team is Arsenal). They play much better football than City who are nearly as bad as Chelski to watch. They have more strength in depth than City, I mean look at their midfield for a start. The problem with Tottenham is the strikers haven't been firing and they've been relying on Van Der Vaart too often. John, fully agree with us not doing much better if we had 10 men, probably would of turned out the same. It's not often I praise Tottenham so lap it up while you can ;D Note to self: only watch Man United and Arsenal in next years Champions League unless I want to have a nap ;D Not happy Spurs lost 5-1 to Man City today.... I guess we'll see how Parker and Adebayor do in the next game... I do wish Spurs will give up with this Stratford thing... it's getting tiring, unless it's a ruse to extract more money out of Haringey Council... even Boris wants to throw £80m at them to stay... But 8-2..... oh dear ;D Thank God it wasn't double digits. |
|
|
|
Post by Volvo on Aug 28, 2011 21:12:02 GMT
oh my god Arsenal u lost 8-2 to manutd i dont like both teams but i like Arsenal better than manu What can I say my team are just superior to arsenal, arsenal are just crap and I blame arsene tight spender. The team hasnt won a decent trophy for 6 years and each season arsenal just seem to get worse and worse. I am just glad I am not a arsenal fan, especially as season ticket holder. |
|
|
|
Post by VPL630 on Aug 28, 2011 21:55:44 GMT
I 8-2 be an Aresnal Supporter at the moment *CoverFace*
|
|
|
|
Post by Volvo on Aug 28, 2011 22:17:23 GMT
LOOOOOL everyone is going around saying I would 8-2 be and arsenal fan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Volvo on Aug 28, 2011 22:50:18 GMT
Its only natural that arsenal are s*** because s*** comes out your arse/anal. so thats what you get from a team called arse/anal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2011 23:23:00 GMT
Its only natural that arsenal are s*** because s*** comes out your arse/anal. so thats what you get from a team called arse/anal. If only there was a dislike button for this, I'd dislike it..  |
|
|
|
Post by Steve80 on Aug 29, 2011 0:11:06 GMT
Its only natural that arsenal are s*** because s*** comes out your arse/anal. so thats what you get from a team called arse/anal. If only there was a dislike button for this, I'd dislike it.. Me too! If arsenal were .... then they would be at the bottom of the league  At the end of the day, man u are the champions and theres no shame in losing to them. 8-2, 9-1 or even 10-0, the result is the same, you get 3 points for winning and none for losing. Just remember, arsenal have lost two of their most influential players in nasri and fabregas. With clichy also gone and three of our defenders also missing today (as well as others), the last thing you would want is to have your youngsters playing against the champions especially as these youngsters have hardly played many games for us. Then we talk about Francis Coquelin whos immediately brought into the team against opponents of high standard despite only being brought back to arsenal only a day ago. We could go on about the type of players we need. But, the only thing bothering me right now is Johan Djourou. Everytime arsenal concede a goal he seems to be there most of the time. Maybe the other players are not helping him out but it seems when ever he has a chance to deal with the situation he doesn't do it  |
|
Did you see Man City in the Europa League this year??? Compared to us in the Champions League??? Really??? Really???
