|
Uno
Aug 29, 2020 12:26:52 GMT
via mobile
vjaska likes this
Post by TB123 on Aug 29, 2020 12:26:52 GMT
383 spare Enviro 605 has gone for refurbishment. It'll receive the same moquette, route branding inside&out as the 15 plate examples 601-604
|
|
|
Post by kmkcheng on Aug 29, 2020 12:28:17 GMT
There’s a picture of WS46 on FB fully blinded for the 395. Looks like this could be the bus they may use as their extra for the route
|
|
|
Post by LondonNorthern on Aug 29, 2020 13:09:04 GMT
There’s a picture of WS46 on FB fully blinded for the 395. Looks like this could be the bus they may use as their extra for the route Could you link the post?
|
|
|
Post by TB123 on Aug 29, 2020 13:13:05 GMT
There’s a picture of WS46 on FB fully blinded for the 395. Looks like this could be the bus they may use as their extra for the route Could you link the post? With thanks to Callum Connor for letting me post this.
|
|
|
Uno
Aug 30, 2020 23:04:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by uakari on Aug 30, 2020 23:04:04 GMT
Can't see how they could be cheaper than Metroline or Sovereign for the 107 given they'd have to factor in ferry cars for meal reliefs - but the local Barnet routes, 234, 382, 384, would seem a good shout for Uno to potentially bid for in future. I absolutely love the route branding they worked with Best Impressions on for the 383 - it looks absolutely fantastic, and that should be a widespread template for route branding on single deckers imo. Nice internal coves explaining places along the route too, nice touch Extension of the 383 will make the branding out of date 😕 This is why I think route branding is a bad idea, especially in London where changes and extensions are common. It is an unnecessary expense to have to change it every time. Timetables and apps are enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Uno
Sept 1, 2020 3:12:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2020 3:12:18 GMT
It's a little late but does anyone know the scheduled times for the extra 395?
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 7:52:26 GMT
via mobile
Post by LondonNorthern on Sept 5, 2020 7:52:26 GMT
Not to be pedantic but I find the 383 extension a waste of money, particularly when the 382 can just do a double runner round the hospital.
|
|
|
Post by ThinLizzy on Sept 5, 2020 9:53:17 GMT
Not to be pedantic but I find the 383 extension a waste of money, particularly when the 382 can just do a double runner round the hospital. in terms of scheduling, the 382 doing a "double run around the hospital" may mean adding an extra bus to the schedule. Likewise, the 383 extension may be more beneficial for the areas it serves
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 13:12:52 GMT
via mobile
Post by Busboy105 on Sept 5, 2020 13:12:52 GMT
The 383’s being extended?
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 13:14:26 GMT
via mobile
vjaska likes this
Post by TB123 on Sept 5, 2020 13:14:26 GMT
The 383’s being extended? Yes to Finchley Memorial Hospital
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 13:15:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by Busboy105 on Sept 5, 2020 13:15:04 GMT
The 383’s being extended? Yes to Finchley Memorial Hospital Would it still serve Woodside Park?
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 13:18:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by TB123 on Sept 5, 2020 13:18:38 GMT
Yes to Finchley Memorial Hospital Would it still serve Woodside Park? I believe so
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 21:26:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by LondonNorthern on Sept 5, 2020 21:26:15 GMT
Would it still serve Woodside Park? I believe so I think if stand space was better and the route was more reliable the 112 could always be extended to Woodside Park, it can take deckers along Woodside Park Road like on RRP, and then the 383 could be withdrawn between North Finchley High Road & Woodside Park and obviously extended to Finchley Memorial Hospital
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 21:44:13 GMT
via mobile
Post by Busboy105 on Sept 5, 2020 21:44:13 GMT
I think if stand space was better and the route was more reliable the 112 could always be extended to Woodside Park, it can take deckers along Woodside Park Road like on RRP, and then the 383 could be withdrawn between North Finchley High Road & Woodside Park and obviously extended to Finchley Memorial Hospital Aren’t the roads in Woodside Park too narrow for the 112?
|
|
|
Uno
Sept 5, 2020 21:57:33 GMT
via mobile
Post by LondonNorthern on Sept 5, 2020 21:57:33 GMT
I think if stand space was better and the route was more reliable the 112 could always be extended to Woodside Park, it can take deckers along Woodside Park Road like on RRP, and then the 383 could be withdrawn between North Finchley High Road & Woodside Park and obviously extended to Finchley Memorial Hospital Aren’t the roads in Woodside Park too narrow for the 112? I really doubt they are - once again Rail Replacement services do the double run down Woodside Park Road.
|
|