|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on May 4, 2024 3:50:24 GMT
Been using route 49 a lot recently, the service is an absolute mess. Nearly every route 49 bus was terminating early at Battersea Bridge or Battersea, Latchmere Road yesterday. Even right now, there's curtailments galore on the route. There are huge gaps in service. Now, I understand there's some roadworks along the route but route C1 another RATP route from the same garage as route 49 and which goes through similar areas is operated better. All the more reason why route 49 should be reawarded to Transport UK.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on May 4, 2024 3:41:26 GMT
82032 Makes its first appearance on route 86. I have the feeling that the introduction of electric buses is making more progress on route 276 than route 86.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on May 4, 2024 3:09:22 GMT
Other than the major Oxford Street has there been any other areas which has lost a major bus service scene? Im very close to the Euston Road and walking distance to major hotspots, Baker Street, Warren Street, King’s Cross, pretty much the central section of routes 30/205, and the amount of route’s removed from the area is numerous. There are probably more that has slipped my tongue. The 10 has been withdrawn. The 14 was rerouted. The 45 was curtailed. The 59 was rerouted. The 82 has been withdrawn. The 168 has been withdrawn. The 476 was curtailed away. The C2 has been withdrawn. Other changes: 8 curtail, 14/188 reroute, 88 reroute, 134 curtail, While most have been replaced, it really does make me wonder if some of these changes could have been prevented or rehearsed differently. For starters, the 88 running via Mornington Crescent and Warren Street but still extended to PHF and the 134 diverted to Victoria instead with no changes to the 22. I would have kept the 10/73 running their previous routes from Hammersmith and Victoria (10 via Warren Street). I would have kept the 1 and 59 together at Southampton Row, with the 168 gone (as happened merged with the 1 instead). I would have the 68 diverted to Oxford Circus however via Bloomsbury Square and New Oxford Street and British Museum so it still serves the Southern side of Southampton Row. I would have withdrew the 390 as a whole, rerouted the 263 at Archway to King’s Cross via the 390 route and had the 271 still running instead. I also would have kept the 45, but extended to Camden Town via the 214 route instead. The 17 still basically serves Bart’s, just not the front door. I would withdraw the 46 between S’t Pancras International and Bart’s instead. 14 to remain at Warren Street, it served a unique purpose. I cant say I disagree or would have done anything differently with the changes for the 82/476. 45 to Camden Town would be too much IMO, should of remained running to Kings Cross at the very least It seems incredible to believe that from 1978-85 route 45 went from South Kensington to Archway via Brixton.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 28, 2024 16:28:25 GMT
Hopefully Andy Burnham will be promoted at some point so that HS2 North would be back on the cards (or whatever it may be called instead). Unless he is defeated in his bid for re-election for Mayor of Greater Manchester, he will not be available to stand as a candidate for Westminster. He would therefore be unable to be promoted to government even if Labour win (which I think they will).
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 28, 2024 9:44:33 GMT
I think routes 126 & B16 could be merged into a single Bromley - Eltham - Bexleyheath route. The section of route B16 between Eltham & Kidbrooke could be replaced by an extension of route 233.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 27, 2024 21:54:10 GMT
Spurs' Daniel Levy is storing EN18 in the Trophy Room as there is plenty of space until the Club use her at the end of the season According to "Chas 'n' Dave" (you're way too young to remember them) EN18 won't be needed for another seven years... www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9tsTG4k0nEI was hoping for those ENs to stay in service for so many more years that they would be rare Stars Over 45
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 27, 2024 21:44:25 GMT
Pedant alert. That notice commemorates it having operated with Stagecoach 1991-2024. While it has operated from TL throughout that time, and resisted transfer to KB, it has only been Stagecoach in 1994-2006 and 2010-24.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 27, 2024 20:25:55 GMT
I think routes 380 & 469 could be merged into a single Lewisham - Woolwich - Erith route. The 469 section to QEH could be replaced by route 99.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 27, 2024 20:19:26 GMT
Was the introduction of the 254 a part of why the 279 was fully cut from Holloway, or were the 2 events unrelated? I would by no means want to have the corridor between Seven Sisters and Manor House with the solo 259, which is why I suggested extending the 149, which could save some money whilst also providing a bit more capacity North of Edmonton Green (whilst I know money isn't too much of an issue on TfL's end now, it could help move the budget to more useful bus routes than the 349). Any of the 149 / 259 / 279 could take a slight frequency increase, if things were to get too busy, and if reliability is a concern, the 149 could be cut to Liverpool Street, which whilst it would require a change to continue to London Bridge for most journeys, most links are not broken through the 388 to London Bridge Bus Station and the 35 and 47 just outside it. On another point, the 279 would benefit a lot from an extension to Finsbury Park as greg had said, with the Manor House terminus not allowing easy interchange to other buses such as the 29, due to the approximately 200 metre walk to the nearest 29 bus stop, and the large U-turn required to turn the 279 around, with Manor House also not providing nearly enough onward connections as Finsbury Park. Though I have a question that I'm unsure of how others would react to - would the A10 corridor benefit from a parallel bus route along Watermead Way, once the Meridian Water development has been completed - say, from Edmonton Green, up the North Circular, through part of the Meridian Water development, down Watermead Way, through Tottenham Hale and onward to Seven Sisters and beyond? I think it might work if appropriate bus priority measures are installed along Watermead Way (especially Southbound), and could benefit from being a much higher-speed bus service through faster roads (avoiding a lot of 20mph speed limits). No the 254 was unrelated and took place in May 2003. In effect the 253 was already operated as two overlapping sections (Euston-Hackney and Holloway-Aldgate) and the introduction of the 254 merely formalised that arrangement. I'm not convinced extending the 279 to Finsbury Park would be worthwhile. Finsbury Park is congested and such an extension would be time-consuming, and when journeys operated to Holloway they were generally under-used beyond Manor House. The 259 provides an alternative for most journeys. It just would have been nicer had the Aldgate route kept the traditional number 253, with the newer route to Euston given the number 254.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 20, 2024 20:47:10 GMT
As I live in Stockport I am about to list some sample routes in the Manchester Bee Network thread ...and as you're a Stockport local, how's the shiny new 'Stockport Interchange' working out? (I haven't been to Stockport for many years but understood it resembled a bomb-site with all the work going on...) Some of the choices of which routes use which stops is quite clever allowing for onward connections. A downside is that you have to cross a road to use routes that do not terminate at Stockport, most notably route 199. Route 192 doesn't even use the bus station, but then with sometimes 3 buses waiting to depart it probably wouldn't work out. Also, the cafe is yet to open in the bus station.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 20, 2024 5:33:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 20, 2024 5:28:16 GMT
Rather irresponsible, to say the least.
I used SPCT on route E4 (Brighouse - Barkisland) in March. A couple of passengers knew the driver and chatted a bit. He went on to take some interest in where I was exploring, but we didn't talk about buses as such.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 20, 2024 5:22:01 GMT
So vjaska many routes being taken over by Metroline include the following:- This list is not necessarily complete. All routes I have listed serve central Manchester unless otherwise stated. Hyde Road (currently Stagecoach) 15, 42/42a/42b/42c, 201-206, 250, 255 Sharston (currently Stagecoach) 43, 50, 101, 102. Route 43 seems likely to retain current BYDs. Ashton (currently Stagecoach) 216, 219, 230/231 and other local routes including routes 7/330 to Stockport. Wythenshawe (currently Arriva) 263 and local routes mainly around Altrincham & Sale.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 20, 2024 5:13:56 GMT
When routes 228 & 316 gain Volvo BZLs, will the DELs just reconvert route 190 or will any move to any other route?
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 20, 2024 5:13:05 GMT
Luckily I go to Manchester very often so will definitely go on the prowl for these buses can barely believe they’re 10 years old tbh, they certainly don’t look it Does seem a bit far in advance to be preparing the buses, but nothing like a bit of forward planning. I wonder if they’ll keep the same fleet numbers!!!! As your quite knowledgeable about Manchester, is there any indication what routes these are going on and are these routes mainly town work or cross country? As I live in Stockport I am about to list some sample routes in the Manchester Bee Network thread
|
|