|
Post by LT 20181 on Aug 16, 2023 14:05:44 GMT
Trivia: PV will operate two routes that have the same termini for both ends 83 and 245 Similar at RP and soon WJ with the 223 & H17.
|
|
|
Post by metrolinewest on Aug 16, 2023 22:56:07 GMT
Trivia: PV will operate two routes that have the same termini for both ends 83 and 245 Similar at RP and soon WJ with the 223 & H17. Agree, although this may change if 223 is extended further towards harrow view which is being consulted on
|
|
|
Post by VMH2537 on Aug 21, 2023 13:17:30 GMT
Does anyone know if the 79 will increase on its PVR once extended?
|
|
|
Post by JUNIOR26 on Aug 21, 2023 13:23:44 GMT
Does anyone know if the 79 will increase on its PVR once extended? One extra bus. PVR goes from 11 to 12.
|
|
|
Post by BE37054 (quoll662) on Aug 22, 2023 6:56:29 GMT
Does anyone know if the 79 will increase on its PVR once extended? One extra bus. PVR goes from 11 to 12. Assumedly will be covered by the 1 ADH made spare by the H14 PVR cut.
|
|
|
Post by metrolinewest on Aug 26, 2023 4:58:30 GMT
Saw LF68PYP on 79, don't think it is blinded for stonebridge Park as it was showing Alperton on blinds on beresford avenue. Surely RATP should have blinded the VH allocated to the route at least
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Aug 26, 2023 9:41:07 GMT
Saw LF68PYP on 79, don't think it is blinded for stonebridge Park as it was showing Alperton on blinds on beresford avenue. Surely RATP should have blinded the VH allocated to the route at least I'm not surprised, it's RATP. Metroline would have done far better.
|
|
|
Post by paulo on Aug 26, 2023 10:08:48 GMT
Saw LF68PYP on 79, don't think it is blinded for stonebridge Park as it was showing Alperton on blinds on beresford avenue. Surely RATP should have blinded the VH allocated to the route at least I'm not surprised, it's RATP. Metroline would have done far better. Of course they would have…
|
|
|
Post by northlondon83 on Aug 26, 2023 10:33:01 GMT
I'm not surprised, it's RATP. Metroline would have done far better. Of course they would have… Regardless of what you think, it's still embarrassing for RATP to not display the correct blinds! It's not that difficult.
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Aug 26, 2023 10:49:40 GMT
Of course they would have… Regardless of what you think, it's still embarrassing for RATP to not display the correct blinds! It's not that difficult. This is getting really boring now. The blinds are probably on order! Yes its not ideal but do Metroline buses have updated blinds for the changes? pretty sure its been widely reported here they have had buses running without destinations and numbers on some occasions.
Comments like "It's not that difficult" make you sound like a armchair expert.
|
|
|
Post by paulo on Aug 26, 2023 10:50:05 GMT
Of course they would have… Regardless of what you think, it's still embarrassing for RATP to not display the correct blinds! It's not that difficult. You’re assuming it’s their fault when you don’t know if it is.
|
|
|
Post by cardinal on Aug 26, 2023 13:50:00 GMT
I'm not surprised, it's RATP. Metroline would have done far better. Of course they would have… Of course, we all know that. 😂
|
|
|
Post by metrolinewest on Aug 26, 2023 13:51:08 GMT
I'm not too sure but do BT buses mainly the VH have 18 on their blinds? if so it should allow reprogramming for stonebridge Park to align with 79?
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Aug 26, 2023 13:51:57 GMT
Saw LF68PYP on 79, don't think it is blinded for stonebridge Park as it was showing Alperton on blinds on beresford avenue. Surely RATP should have blinded the VH allocated to the route at least I'm not surprised, it's RATP. Metroline would have done far better. No Metroline would have not done better. I’ve seen countless Metroline with blank or no number and destination blinds.
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Aug 26, 2023 13:53:14 GMT
Of course they would have… Regardless of what you think, it's still embarrassing for RATP to not display the correct blinds! It's not that difficult. How do you know it’s not that hard do you work a bus company?
|
|