|
|
Post by londonbusbro on Apr 25, 2024 13:05:31 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas
N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park
N343: should be 24 hour
N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136
N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour
N21: should be 24 hour
N279: should be 24 hour
N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham
159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route
|
|
|
|
Post by rift on Apr 25, 2024 13:37:56 GMT
The N89 doesn’t even follow all three routes you mentioned for significant periods of time, the longest parallelI being the 36 and N136 from Camberwell Green to New Cross Gate.
I really wonder whether all three of these route threads you have opened is serious or just a wind up.
|
|
|
|
Post by george on Apr 25, 2024 13:41:23 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park N343: should be 24 hour N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136 N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour N21: should be 24 hour N279: should be 24 hour N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham 159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route And your reasons for this are? |
|
|
|
Post by southlondon413 on Apr 25, 2024 13:45:09 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park N343: should be 24 hour N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136 N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour N21: should be 24 hour N279: should be 24 hour N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham 159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route Um the N89 is incredibly useful between Trafalgar Square and Blackfriars as it is the only route to connect to the overnight Thameslink trains from there. So not useless at all. |
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Apr 25, 2024 13:48:36 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park N343: should be 24 hour N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136 N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour N21: should be 24 hour N279: should be 24 hour N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham 159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route And your reasons for this are? Probably no reason other than even more threads with the same couple of people ripping the bus network to bits with no real reason. I know we all like different aspects of buses but I must say I find the whole route ideas tiresome. It’s not like any of the ideas are likely to happen. |
|
|
|
Post by londonbuses on Apr 25, 2024 13:53:43 GMT
And your reasons for this are? Probably no reason other than even more threads with the same couple of people ripping the bus network to bits with no real reason. I know we all like different aspects of buses but I must say I find the whole route ideas tiresome. It’s not like any of the ideas are likely to happen. I'm not agreeing with the OP's ideas at all, but there's nothing wrong with people having their own ideas about the bus network and asking for opinions. I am sure you have some ideas about some route changes too, just like the rest of us, so there's no need to put others down for posting ideas, however good or bad they are. What's the point in a forum about buses if people aren't allowed to discuss bus routes? |
|
|
|
Post by vjaska on Apr 25, 2024 14:04:13 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park N343: should be 24 hour N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136 N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour N21: should be 24 hour N279: should be 24 hour N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham 159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route There is no need for a N59 or a N415 at all. You can't have the 159 as a 24 hour service if your then running it over the N109 as then you seem to be suggesting the 159 should be Oxford Circus to Croydon 24 hours which is completely unworkable. The N250 is not 24 hours anymore because the day route was cut back to West Croydon. Can you please stop using the word useless when it has no bearing on bus routes at all - look up the definition of useless. |
|
|
|
Post by george on Apr 25, 2024 14:35:49 GMT
Probably no reason other than even more threads with the same couple of people ripping the bus network to bits with no real reason. I know we all like different aspects of buses but I must say I find the whole route ideas tiresome. It’s not like any of the ideas are likely to happen. I'm not agreeing with the OP's ideas at all, but there's nothing wrong with people having their own ideas about the bus network and asking for opinions. I am sure you have some ideas about some route changes too, just like the rest of us, so there's no need to put others down for posting ideas, however good or bad they are. What's the point in a forum about buses if people aren't allowed to discuss bus routes? I don't disagree but reasons why would be nice as well. Then people can sort of discuss the proposals more. |
|
|
|
Post by george on Apr 25, 2024 14:36:06 GMT
Probably no reason other than even more threads with the same couple of people ripping the bus network to bits with no real reason. I know we all like different aspects of buses but I must say I find the whole route ideas tiresome. It’s not like any of the ideas are likely to happen. I'm not agreeing with the OP's ideas at all, but there's nothing wrong with people having their own ideas about the bus network and asking for opinions. I am sure you have some ideas about some route changes too, just like the rest of us, so there's no need to put others down for posting ideas, however good or bad they are. What's the point in a forum about buses if people aren't allowed to discuss bus routes? I don't disagree but reasons why would be nice as well. Then people can sort of discuss the proposals more. |
|
|
|
Post by WH241 on Apr 25, 2024 14:52:57 GMT
Probably no reason other than even more threads with the same couple of people ripping the bus network to bits with no real reason. I know we all like different aspects of buses but I must say I find the whole route ideas tiresome. It’s not like any of the ideas are likely to happen. I'm not agreeing with the OP's ideas at all, but there's nothing wrong with people having their own ideas about the bus network and asking for opinions. I am sure you have some ideas about some route changes too, just like the rest of us, so there's no need to put others down for posting ideas, however good or bad they are. What's the point in a forum about buses if people aren't allowed to discuss bus routes? Haha I do have to laugh when others post similar to what I said but you come after me with the reply like this. It’s hypocritical you accuse me of putting people down when you are doing the same. I am the easy target to reply to as I am outside the forum clique 😉 Never said about discussing actual real routes but just how many threads are needed about fantasy or route changes ideas? The answer is two and they already exist. One for fantasy and one for general suggestions. |
|
|
|
Post by COBO on Apr 25, 2024 15:02:54 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park N343: should be 24 hour N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136 N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour N21: should be 24 hour N279: should be 24 hour N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham 159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route What’s wrong with the ideas / fantasy thread? |
|
|
|
Post by londonbusbro on Apr 25, 2024 15:20:54 GMT
you guys want reason here is some.
I understand why the N250 is like how it is so i do take that back
reason why i said what i said about routes like N21, N89, N279, N343 is cause the routes already good enough they dont have to go to central at night
the reason i said about the N415 was because streatham and tulse hill have no link in the night
also the N59 would just be a nice idea
and the 159 my point is it literally does the same route as the N109 just slightly shorter
|
|
|
|
Post by londonbusbro on Apr 25, 2024 15:23:23 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park N343: should be 24 hour N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136 N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour N21: should be 24 hour N279: should be 24 hour N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham 159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route What’s wrong with the ideas / fantasy thread? true but i want a thread specified to night routes |
|
|
|
Post by londonbusbro on Apr 25, 2024 15:24:09 GMT
This page is about night routes that should be 24 hour and new night routes and poo like that heres some of my ideas N59: doing the old route all the way up to king's cross also finishing at clapham park N343: should be 24 hour N89: withdrawn between trafalgar square and lewisham since the route is useless and its just mimcing routes like the N53 and the 36 and the N136 N250: wouldn't change much but could be 24 hour N21: should be 24 hour N279: should be 24 hour N415: extension from tulse hill to Streatham 159 24 hour service: copys the N109 so should be axed or it could be called the N159 and go to marble arch like the old route There is no need for a N59 or a N415 at all. You can't have the 159 as a 24 hour service if your then running it over the N109 as then you seem to be suggesting the 159 should be Oxford Circus to Croydon 24 hours which is completely unworkable. The N250 is not 24 hours anymore because the day route was cut back to West Croydon. Can you please stop using the word useless when it has no bearing on bus routes at all - look up the definition of useless. I know what useless means lol i just overuse it sometimes which i do apolgize for |
|
|
|
Post by Trafalgax on Apr 25, 2024 15:35:21 GMT
|
|
